Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ksl Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$403k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Animals$2.0MArts & Culture$666kEducation$255kPhilanthropy$176kRecreation & Sports$65kHuman Services$64kYouth Development$34kHealth$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $169k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$10,876
Median grant
1
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART$100,000
YOUTH ORCHESTRAS OF SAN ANTONIO$100,000
SAN ANTONIO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM$43,175
THE CHARITY BALL ASSOCIATION$38,800
REMEMBER THE ALAMO FOUNDATION$26,500
RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO INCORPORATED$24,200
UNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO & BEXAR COUNTY$15,000
SAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC$10,876
GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHWEST TEXAS$10,000
SPURS GIVE$9,120
SAN ANTONIO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC$8,750
MCNAY ART MUSEUM$7,500
SAN ANTONIO LIVESTOCK EXPOSITION INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $83k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO: $10k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO INCORPORATED: $25k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO INCORPORATED: $24k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO INCORPORATED: $15k → 16%SPURS GIVE: $9k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.8M · 13 repeat orgs$522k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +1% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
12

Total granted

$2.8M
$352k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
0%

Still filing today

92%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $169k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationPublic BenefitHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART
    3× · 2023–2025 · $350k · revenue +27%
  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM
    3× · 2023–2025 · $103k · revenue +28%
  • RC
    Respite Care of San Antonio Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $64k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • MH
    MARIN HORIZON SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2024 · $250k · revenue +4%
  • TS
    THE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEMgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue +42%
  • HF
    Haven for Hope of Bexar County
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Satx

The mission of greater:satx is to lead the developemnt and diversification of san antonio regional economy through the recruitment and expansion of qualify employers and job producing investments.

2
Tennis Officials of San Antonio Association
Recreation & Sports
3
University of Texas At San Antonio Alumni Association

To engage our alumni in activities that will advance utsa as a top-tier institution. our focus is to deliver value-added services and events where our alumni can connect with each other, with current students and/or with the university. we…

4
San Antonio Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
5
San Antonio Medical Foundation

The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.

Health
6
San Antonio Report

Publishing a local online news source. We believe a well informed and connected community is essential to making San Antonio a better place to live, work and play.

Arts & Culture
7
San Antonio Area Foundation

To serve as your most trusted and impactful philanthropic partner.

Philanthropy
8
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
9
Symphony Society of San Antonio

The san antonio symphony's mission is to delight, engage, and inspire the entire community through excellent performance, education, and outreach

10
Arboretum San Antonio

Arboretum San Antonio (ASA), a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization founded in 2021, is building a world-class arboretum on the former Republic Golf Course in the heart of San Antonios historic Southside. The first in San Antonio and the…

Environment
11
San Antonio Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Inc

The mission of the san antonio hispanic chamber of commerce is to advocate in building a better san antonio through the growth and prosperity of hispanic, small minority, women-owned businesses, and hispanic professional and trade…

12
San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts

The mission of the San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts shall be to establish and maintain a museum in order to house and exhibit a permanent collection of art as well as to provide space for traveling exhibitions, for the purpose of the…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth Orchestras of San Antonio and the most unlike its peers is The Studio Museum in Harlem. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPerforming Arts & Music Edu…Industry Trade AssociationsYouth Sports ProgramsHealthcare Philanthropy & S…Youth Education and Support…Military & Veterans SupportBexar County Community Serv…Community Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%7%<5yr17%0%5–10yr18%14%10–20yr15%21%20–35yr10%29%35–55yr15%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr17%0%5–10yr18%3%10–20yr15%18%20–35yr10%13%35–55yr15%66%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
15%
1,088/7,169

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
11/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $2,010,875 · AnimalsSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETYSAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART — $350,000 · Arts & CultureSAN ANTONIO MUSEUM …SAN ANTONIO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $103,175 · Arts & CultureSAN ANTONIO CHILDRE…Remember the Alamo Foundation — $58,000 · Arts & CultureRemember the Alamo …THE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM — $40,000 · Arts & CultureTHE STUDIO MUSEUM I…+2 more — $15,000 · Arts & CultureMARIN HORIZON SCHOOL INC — $250,000 · Education+1 more — $5,000 · EducationCHARITY BALL LEGACY FOUNDATION INC — $116,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY — $55,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CHARITY BALL ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO INC — $38,800 · PhilanthropyYOUTH ORCHESTRAS OF SAN ANTONIO — $100,000 · OtherCHRISTUS SANTA ROSA-SAN MARCOS FOUNDATION — $20,000 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHWEST TEXAS INC — $10,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO LIVESTOCK EXPOSITION INC — $23,750 · OtherHaven for Hope of Bexar County — $14,620 · OtherNEW DAY ADVENTURES IN RECOVERY — $10,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC — $8,750 · Other+7 more — $20,500 · OtherRespite Care of San Antonio Inc — $64,200 · Human ServicesGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO — $10,000 · Human ServicesSPURS GIVE — $9,120 · Human ServicesSOUND OFF — $20,000 · Public BenefitCongressional Medal of Honor Society of the United States of America — $8,750 · Public Benefit
Animals$2,010,875Arts & Culture$566,175Education$255,000Philanthropy$210,300Other$207,620Human Services$83,320Public Benefit$28,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $2,010,875 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetSAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART — $350,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetMARIN HORIZON SCHOOL INC — $250,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCHARITY BALL LEGACY FOUNDATION INC — $116,500 over 2y, 45% of budgetSAN ANTONIO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $103,175 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetYOUTH ORCHESTRAS OF SAN ANTONIO — $100,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetRespite Care of San Antonio Inc — $64,200 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetRemember the Alamo Foundation — $58,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY — $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO LIVESTOCK EXPOSITION INC — $23,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUND OFF — $20,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCHRISTUS SANTA ROSA-SAN MARCOS FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetHaven for Hope of Bexar County — $14,620 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEW DAY ADVENTURES IN RECOVERY — $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHWEST TEXAS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMCNAY ART MUSEUM — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPURS GIVE — $9,120 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC — $8,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCongressional Medal of Honor Society of the United States of America — $8,750 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ALAMO AREA COUNCIL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBALLET SAN ANTONIO — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChild Legacy International Inc — $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOS COMPADRES DE SAN ANTONIO — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992TX32.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · John R & Greli N Less Charitable Trust #FE324 · Mays Family Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Charitable Foundation Frost F0359600 · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Betty Stieren Kelso Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation · McCombs Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ksl Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph