Skip to content
Jsrm Foundation-Ixis 4 at a glance

· Private foundation

Jsrm Foundation-Ixis 4

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$381k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Social Science$753kHealth$307kInternational$198kArts & Culture$95kEducation$70kHuman Services$42kScience & Tech$37kFood & Nutrition$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $111k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$8.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GLADSTONE INSTITUTES$250,000
THE BOSTON SYNAGOGUE$20,000
REVIVED SOLDIERS UKRAINE$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
GIVE DIRECTLY$10,500
RIP MEDICAL DEBT$10,000
HACKLEY SCHOOL$10,000
PRION ALLIANCE$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$10,000
FEEDING AMERICA$5,000
NEW CHORAL SOCIETY OF CENTRL WESTCHESTER$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
HOFF BARTHELSON MUSIC SCHOOL$5,000
HARVARD-RADCLIFFE CLUB OF WESTCHESTER$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $20k → 13%LEARNING ALLY INC: $100 → 11%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $20k → 13%LEARNING ALLY INC: $100 → 11%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $10k → 13%RIP MEDICAL DEBT: $10k → 13%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $100 → 14%GIVE DIRECTLY: $20k → 17%GIVE DIRECTLY: $10k → 17%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
AR
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 61 repeat orgs$141k to everyone else

61 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 50 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

61
17

Total granted

$1.4M
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+37%

Still filing today

72%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureInternationalEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    PRION ALLIANCE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +127%
  • MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $60k · revenue +46%
  • HM
    HOFF-BARTHELSON MUSIC SCHOOL
    8× · 2018–2025 · $45k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • UH
    UKRAINE HOUSE DC FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue +34%
  • RI
    RADCLIFFE INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • CS
    COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
7
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
10
Council On Foreign Relations Inc

The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…

International
11
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
12
Researchamerica

2025 was a turbulent year for the medical and health research community, but our commitment to advocating for science never wavered. from pushing back against funding threats to elevating researchers' voices and equipping advocates, we…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is New Choral Society of Central Westchester. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
58/58
Grantees still filing
45/58
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GLADSTONE INSTITUTES: $750,000 · OtherGLADSTONE INSTITUTESCALVARY HOSPITAL STORRS SOCIETY: $100,000 · OtherCALVARY HOSPITAL STORRS SOCIETY+37 more: $122,371 · Other+37 morePRION ALLIANCE INC: $70,000 · HealthPRION ALLI…HACKLEY SCHOOL: $22,500 · HealthHACKLEY SC…PULMONARY FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $15,000 · HealthPULMONARY …THE ASSOCIATION FOR FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION: $10,000 · HealthTHE ASSOCI…Scleroderma Research Foundation: $10,000 · HealthScleroderm…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $10,000 · HealthPLANNED PA…GLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthGLAUCOMA R…+6 more: $1,200 · HealthRevived Soldiers Ukraine: $100,000 · InternationalRevived S…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $33,000 · InternationalMEDECINS …+6 more: $4,600 · InternationalUKRAINE HOUSE DC FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · Arts & CultureUKRAINE H…HOFF-BARTHELSON MUSIC SCHOOL: $45,050 · Arts & CultureHOFF-BART…New Choral Society of Central Westchester: $25,000 · Arts & CultureNew Chora…+7 more: $3,950 · Arts & CultureMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $40,500 · Human Services+2 more: $400 · Human ServicesSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC: $22,400 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $21,753 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORG: $6,508 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Education+4 more: $900 · EducationFeeding America: $30,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$972,371Health$148,700International$137,600Arts & Culture$134,000Human Services$100,900Education$64,061Food & Nutrition$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRevived Soldiers Ukraine: $100,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetPRION ALLIANCE INC: $70,000 over 7y, 5.2% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUKRAINE HOUSE DC FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOFF-BARTHELSON MUSIC SCHOOL: $45,050 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $40,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $33,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNew Choral Society of Central Westchester: $25,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetHACKLEY SCHOOL: $22,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC: $22,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $21,753 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPULMONARY FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATION FOR FRONTOTEMPORAL DEGENERATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetScleroderma Research Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $6,508 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC: $4,321 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Metropolitan Opera Guild Inc: $2,650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHORTON'S KIDS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALING THE CHILDREN NEW JERSEY INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWNET: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNUNATAKS LTD D/B/A GREENBURGH NATURE CENTER: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBHARATIYA VIDYA BHAVAN USA INC: $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Pierpont Morgan Library: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundJpmorgan Chase Founda…The Pfizer Foundation…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The Bank of America C…Morgan Stanley Global…Charities Aid Foundat…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Paypal Charitable Giv…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…
Jewish Communal FundNY14.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jsrm Foundation-Ixis 4 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jsrm Foundation-Ixis 4. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Learning Ally Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jsrm Foundation-Ixis 4?

Find your warmest path to Jsrm Foundation-Ixis 4 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jsrm Foundation-Ixis 4’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home