Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Core Community Organized Relief Effort

We are a crisis response organization that brings immediate aid and recovery to underserved communities across the globe.

$12M
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$408k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Health$4.9MInternational$672kArts & Culture$605kEnvironment$275kHuman Services$214kEmployment$172kYouth Development$83kHousing & Shelter$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $478,785 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $12,119,329 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $11,640,544 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $408k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HERALD CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER$407,999
WAYUU TAYA FOUNDATION INC$50,000
WEST VALLEY COUNSELING CENTER$20,786
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $257k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NORTHWEST NEW MEXICO FIRST BORN: $10k → 32%HAITIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SANT LA INC: $23k → 15%CHRIS 180 INC: $72k → 14%HARAMBEE HOUSE: $21k → 16%CHRIS 180 INC: $72k → 14%CHRIS180: $38k → 14%MEND HEALTH: $5k → 14%SERVICE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIFE: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MI
NY
CA
MD
AZ
NM
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $12M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions, $11M to organizations and $213k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Ukraine$8.0M · 69% · 43 grants · 10 people

Stated purpose: EMERGENCY RESPONSE, WASH, SMALL AND MEDIUM REPAIRS, RESTORATION, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, URBAN RENEWAL, EDUCATION · SUPPORT TO REFUGEE AND SUPPORT TO OPERATIONS IN UKRAINE

Haiti$2.8M · 24% · 35 grants

Stated purpose: REFORESTATION, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, URBAN RENEWAL

Romania$361k · 3% · 8 grants

Stated purpose: SUPPORT TO REFUGEE AND SUPPORT TO OPERATIONS IN UKRAINE

Poland$229k · 2% · 8 grants · 2 people

Stated purpose: SUPPORT TO REFUGEE AND SUPPORT TO OPERATIONS IN UKRAINE

Sudan$183k · 2% · 2 grants · 1 person

Stated purpose: EMERGENCY RESPONSE · SUPPORT TO REFUGEE AND SUPPORT TO OPERATIONS IN UKRAINE

Brazil$15k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: EMERGENCY RESPONSE

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 10 repeat orgs$4.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +79% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
17

Total granted

$2.3M
$4.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+29%

Still filing today

100%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureReligionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NP
    NATIONAL PERFORMANCE NETWORK INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $561k · revenue +66% · 28% of their budget
  • HC
    HERALD CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER
    3× · 2021–2024 · $483k · revenue +58%
  • WT
    WAYUU TAYA FOUNDATIONINC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $353k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3.0M · revenue +42%
  • WS
    WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $547k
  • RC
    ROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $491k · revenue +172%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Healthy Ninos Honduras Inc

Healthy Ninos Honduras works for the health and wholeness of Honduran people, focusing on nutrition, wellness, hygiene, and education.

Food & Nutrition
2
North County Health Project Inc

TrueCare's mission is to improve the health status of our diverse communities by providing quality health care that is comprehensive, affordable and culturally sensitive. In 2024, TrueCare provided 367,941 visits, serving 68,023 patients.

3
El Centro Del Barrio Inc

CentroMed is a network of integrated primary care clinics providing accessible services of superior quality.

Human Services
4
California Black Health Network

The Organization advocates for health equity by leading and facilitating convenings in all regions of California for the purpose of providing policy analysis, research and training that promotes best practices, which supports the creation…

5
Interior Community Health Center

Our mission is to provide universal access to excellent primary health care for patients of all ages, stages of life, and backgrounds.

Health
6
Light From Light Inc

Light from light partners with local leaders to provide healthcare and nutrition for the most vulnerable communities in haiti. our vision is that no child ever dies from malnutrition. our three program focus areas are: 1) nutrition…

International
7
Universal Community Health Center

The organization provides quality and accessible health care to underserved communties and a pateint centered model of care to empower communities towards wellness.

Health
8
Center for African American Health

The Center works to address health disparities in the underserved African American community by offering culturally competent behavioral and physical health education and outreach that empowers community members to overcome the root causes…

Community Improvement
9
All Inclusive Community Health Cent

The organization provides health care and other related services to medically underserved populations in Los Angeles County.

Health
10
Southeast Community Health Systems

The mission of Southeast Community Health Systems is to provide quality, affordable healthcare to all patients in underserved areas and to improve the health and wellness of the communities we serve.

11
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

12
United Medical Centers

UNITED MEDICAL CENTERS IS A TJC ACCREDITED COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER WHOSE MISSION IS TO ASSURE THE AVAILABILITY AND ACCESSIBILITY OF BASIC PRIMARY AND PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE SERVICES TO ALL RESIDENTS OF THE SERVICE AREA. AT UNITED MEDICAL…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Herald Christian Health Center and the most unlike its peers is Global Adolescent Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Immigrant Worker SupportCommunity Arts CentersChristian Missionary Organi…Youth Development CentersDevelopmental Disabilities …Affordable Housing Construc…Community FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%8%<5yr14%17%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%8%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%4%35–55yr16%58%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,536

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $3,000,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY+1 more — $6,000 · EducationROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $490,520 · HealthROOTS COMMUNITY HEALT…HERALD CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER — $483,131 · HealthHERALD CHRISTIAN HEAL…WHITMAN-WALKER HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $231,686 · HealthWHITMAN-WALKER HEALTH…504HEALTHNET INC — $91,184 · Health504HEALTHNET INC+2 more — $46,650 · HealthWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY — $546,774 · OtherWAYNE STATE UNIVERSIT…HAITI TAKES ROOT — $275,000 · OtherHAITI TAKES ROOTWORLD CONCERN DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION — $204,620 · OtherWORLD CONCERN DEVELOP…CHINATOWN SERVICE CENTER — $56,080 · OtherGlobal Adolescent Project Inc — $55,000 · OtherSUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT RESPONSE ORGANIZATION INC — $50,000 · OtherWAYUU TAYA FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · OtherABARA INC — $45,200 · Other+3 more — $28,807 · OtherNATIONAL PERFORMANCE NETWORK INC — $561,339 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL …NATIVE RENEWABLES INC — $44,000 · Arts & CultureNATIVE RE…WAYUU TAYA FOUNDATIONINC — $352,500 · InternationalCHRIS 180 INC — $182,832 · Human ServicesHAITIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SANT LA INC — $22,500 · Human ServicesHarambee House Inc — $21,198 · Human ServicesService Center for Independent Life — $15,000 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST NEW MEXICO FIRST BORN PROGRAM — $10,000 · Human Services+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesEAST LOS ANGELES BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB — $83,236 · Youth Development
Education$3,006,000Health$1,343,171Other$1,311,481Arts & Culture$605,339International$352,500Human Services$256,530Youth Development$83,236

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $3,000,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PERFORMANCE NETWORK INC — $561,339 over 2y, 28% of budgetROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $490,520 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetHERALD CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER — $483,131 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetWAYUU TAYA FOUNDATIONINC — $352,500 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetWHITMAN-WALKER HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $231,686 over 2y, 23% of budgetWORLD CONCERN DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION — $204,620 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetCHRIS 180 INC — $182,832 over 3y, 0.2% of budget504HEALTHNET INC — $91,184 over 2y, 18% of budgetEAST LOS ANGELES BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB — $83,236 over 2y, 22% of budgetCHINATOWN SERVICE CENTER — $56,080 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetABARA INC — $45,200 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetNATIVE RENEWABLES INC — $44,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR BLACK WOMEN'S WELLNESS CBWW INC — $25,864 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHAITIAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER SANT LA INC — $22,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHarambee House Inc — $21,198 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetWest Valley Counseling Center A Non-Profit Organization — $20,786 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetService Center for Independent Life — $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST NEW MEXICO FIRST BORN PROGRAM — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLos Angeles Metropolitan Churches — $8,807 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetPONCE MEDICAL SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Direct ReliefCA14× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Direct Relief · California Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Core Community Organized Relief Effort funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph