Skip to content
Jose Antonio Grifols Lucas Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Jose Antonio Grifols Lucas Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$553k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$540kHuman Services$346kHealth$286kHousing & Shelter$209kEducation$143kEmployment$50kReligion$45kPhilanthropy$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k21 grants · $443k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $110k
$24,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$33k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
National Organization for Rare Disorders Inc$110,000
Tabitha's Way$25,000
Wintergarden Women's Shelter Inc$25,000
Books Between Kids$25,000
Families First of Palm Beach County$25,000
Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Augusta$25,000
Second Harvest Food Bank of NW PA$25,000
Chatham Outreach Alliance Inc DBA CORA Food$25,000
Mirror Ministries$25,000
Project 150$25,000
Kearny Jubilee Center$24,000
Garner Mid Day Rotary Foundation Inc$22,500
Adventure Children's Museum$20,000
The Gathering Place$20,000
Second Harvest Food Bank$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $243k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Kearny Jubilee Center: $24k → 13%Bags of Love Inc: $25k → 15%Simple Method in Loving Everyone: $20k → 15%Merge Memphis Inc: $19k → 17%COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $25k → 14%Mirror Ministries: $25k → 11%DOWNTOWN HAMPTON CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $25k → 14%School Fuel: $15k → 10%The Ordinary People Society: $15k → 17%Project 150: $25k → 13%FLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
MA
OR
NV
SD
IN
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
TN
NC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$690k · 9 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
34

Total granted

$690k
$720k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+21%

Still filing today

78%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $383k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationReligionPublic BenefitHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Feeding America
    3× · 2021–2023 · $71k · revenue +23%
  • CM
    COLLEGE MENTORS FOR KIDS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $55k · revenue +18%
  • BC
    BREAST CANCER SUPPORT SERVICES OF BERKS COUNTY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $50k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SHADE TREE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -17%
  • TG
    THE GATHERING PLACE A REFUGE FOR REBUILDING LIVES
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue -2%
  • FAYETTEVILLE URBAN MINISTRY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
2
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
3
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
4
Food Bank of Eastern Michigan

The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…

Food & Nutrition
5
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
6
America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc

To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.

Food & Nutrition
7
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
8
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

—
9
Regional Food Bank of Oklahoma Inc

The mission of the regional food bank of oklahoma is to lead a network that provides nutritious food and pathways to self-sufficiency for people facing hunger. our vision is an oklahoma where no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
10
Galveston County Food Bank

Create and maintain a food procurement and distribution network that provides nurishing food by maximizing relationships with major food distributors and producers. galveston county food bank effectively distributes nutritious food to…

Human Services
11
Food Finders Food Bank Inc

To distribute surplus food and nonfood products.

Food & Nutrition
12
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Utah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Merge Memphis. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/50
Grantees still filing
30/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR RARE DISORDERS INC: $222,000 · OtherNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR RARE DISORDERS INCHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $90,000 · OtherHUNGER TASK FORCE INCTHE SHADE TREE INC: $50,000 · OtherRainbow Village DBA Promise Community Homes: $50,000 · OtherFamilies First of Palm Beach County: $42,500 · Other+28 more: $546,944 · Other+28 moreCOMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesCOMPREHENSIVE CO…DOWNTOWN HAMPTON CHILD CARE COUNCIL INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN HAMPTON…TABITHA'S WAY: $25,000 · Human ServicesTABITHA'S WAYFLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesFLORENCE FULLER …PROJECT 150: $25,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT 150Mirror Ministries: $25,000 · Human ServicesMirror Ministrie…BAGS OF LOVE: $25,000 · Human ServicesBAGS OF LOVEKEARNEY JUBILEE CENTER: $24,000 · Human ServicesKEARNEY JUBILEE …Simple Methods in Loving Everyone: $20,000 · Human ServicesSimple Methods i…MERGE MEMPHIS: $19,293 · Human ServicesMERGE MEMPHISTHE ORDINARY PEOPLE SOCIETY TOPS: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE ORDINARY PEO…SCHOOL FUEL DBA SCHOOL FUEL SAN MARCOS: $15,000 · Human ServicesSCHOOL FUEL DBA …Feeding America: $70,706 · Food & NutritionFeeding AmericaEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER: $70,000 · Food & NutritionEL PASOANS FIGHT…SECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI: $40,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST F…WIREGRASS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionWIREGRASS AREA F…SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NW PA INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST F…THREE SQUARE: $25,000 · Food & NutritionTHREE SQUARE+1 more: $1,467 · Food & NutritionCOLLEGE MENTORS FOR KIDS INC: $55,000 · EducationBOOKS BETWEEN KIDS INC: $25,000 · EducationGARNER MID-DAY ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $22,500 · EducationFREE 2 TEACH FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $20,000 · EducationTHE GATHERING PLACE A REFUGE FOR REBUILDING LIVES: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterFREDERICK RESCUE MISSION INC: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterBREAST CANCER SUPPORT SERVICES OF BERKS COUNTY: $50,000 · HealthATHENS LAND TRUST INC: $24,000 · EnvironmentKEEP INDIANAPOLIS BEAUTIFUL INC: $20,000 · Environment
Other$1,001,444Human Services$268,293Food & Nutrition$257,173Education$142,500Housing & Shelter$55,000Health$50,000Environment$44,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR RARE DISORDERS INC: $222,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $90,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $70,706 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER: $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE MENTORS FOR KIDS INC: $55,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetTHE SHADE TREE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetBREAST CANCER SUPPORT SERVICES OF BERKS COUNTY: $50,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOODBANK OF SOUTHERN WI: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GATHERING PLACE A REFUGE FOR REBUILDING LIVES: $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFAYETTEVILLE URBAN MINISTRY INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER AUGUSTA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWIREGRASS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetFREDERICK RESCUE MISSION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOOD BANK OF RIO GRANDE VALLEY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOWNTOWN HAMPTON CHILD CARE COUNCIL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTABITHA'S WAY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOOKS BETWEEN KIDS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWINTERGARDEN WOMEN'S SHELTER: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NW PA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLORENCE FULLER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECT 150: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHREE SQUARE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMirror Ministries: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSER-JOBS FOR PROGRESS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER FLINT: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBAGS OF LOVE: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCLEAR PATH FOR VETERANS NEW ENGLAND INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetATHENS LAND TRUST INC: $24,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetKEARNEY JUBILEE CENTER: $24,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetGARNER MID-DAY ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $22,500 over 1y, 19% of budgetADVENTURE CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $20,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetKEEP INDIANAPOLIS BEAUTIFUL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFREE 2 TEACH FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetIMPERIAL VALLEY FOOD BANK: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF VERMILLION: $20,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetPROJECT SAFE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMERGE MEMPHIS: $19,293 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetKIDS IN THE MIDDLE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE ORDINARY PEOPLE SOCIETY TOPS: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY TUSCALOOSA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWAYMAKERS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSCHOOL FUEL DBA SCHOOL FUEL SAN MARCOS: $15,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND OF THE PALM BEACHES INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetChristians Reaching Out To Society Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC: $2,395 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Holdings F…The Gap FoundationCharities Aid Foundat…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…America's CharitiesPublix Super Markets …International Paper C…Aetna Foundation IncThe Blackbaud Giving …Columbus FoundationThe Richard M Schulze…Equitable Foundation …
Enterprise Holdings FoundationMO23.3× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Gap Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · America's Charities · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · International Paper Company Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Columbus Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Equitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jose Antonio Grifols Lucas Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jose Antonio Grifols Lucas Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 62%
  • Clear Path for Veterans New England Inc: 62% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Jose Antonio Grifols Lucas Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Jose Antonio Grifols Lucas Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jose Antonio Grifols Lucas’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home