Skip to content
Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center Inc

Johns hopkins bayview medical center's department of medicine is committed to the practice of primary and specialty medical care, the teaching of medical students, residents, fellows, allied health professionals, and physicians, research and development in basic science, clinical care, health services delivery, and medical education,…

$2.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$11MEducation$2.0MCommunity Improvement$1.2MArts & Culture$74kYouth Development$38kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.3M
$771,137
Median grant
1
States reached
$492M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BALTIMORE MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC$1,572,165
BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM BALTIMORE$771,137
SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$100,000
CREATIVE ALLIANCE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%DUNDALK RENAISSANCE CORPORATION: $65k → 11%KENT COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL: $10k → 12%JOHNS HOPKINS HEALTH SYSTEM: $4.6M → 19%DUNDALK RENAISSANCE CORPORATION: $40k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS HEALTH SYSTEM: $2.2M → 19%DUNDALK RENAISSANCE CORPORATION: $40k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $2.0M → 19%DUNDALK RENAISSANCE CORPORATION: $40k → 11%SISTERS TOGETHER AND REACHING INC: $10k → 19%DUNDALK RENAISSANCE CORPORATION: $40k → 11%SISTERS TOGETHER AND REACHING INC: $5k → 19%DUNDALK RENAISSANCE CORPORATION: $36k → 11%BALTIMORE CORPS: $5k → 19%DUNDALK RENAISSANCE CORPORATION: $35k → 11%BALTIMORE MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC: $1.6M → 19%COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BALTIMORE COUNTY FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 11%SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $200k → 19%COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BALTIMORE COUNTY FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 11%SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $100k → 19%BALTIMORE COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $5k → 11%SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $100k → 19%CHESAPEAKE GATEWAY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $8k → 11%SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $100k → 19%CHESAPEAKE GATEWAY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $8k → 11%SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $100k → 19%CHESAPEAKE GATEWAY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $8k → 11%SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $100k → 19%CHESAPEAKE GATEWAY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $8k → 11%SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $95k → 19%SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $85k → 19%MERIT PROGRAM: $33k → 19%CREATIVE ALLIANCE: $16k → 19%CREATIVE ALLIANCE: $15k → 19%CREATIVE ALLIANCE: $13k → 19%CREATIVE ALLIANCE: $10k → 19%CREATIVE ALLIANCE: $10k → 19%BUDDIES INC: $5k → 19%FRIENDS OF JOESEPH LEE PARK: $5k → 19%BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM BALTIMORE: $771k → 19%BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM BALTIMORE: $729k → 19%BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM BALTIMORE: $623k → 19%BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM BALTIMORE: $350k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 8 repeat orgs$3.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

$11M
$2.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+26%

Still filing today

75%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    JOHNS HOPKINS HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $6.8M · revenue +65%
  • BH
    BEHAVORIAL HEALTH SYSTEMS BALTIMORE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +36%
  • SC
    SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $880k · revenue +266%

Funded once

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $2.0M · revenue +26%
  • ME
    MEDICAL EDUCATION RESOURCES INITIATIVE FOR TEENS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $33k · revenue -79%
  • KC
    KENT CULTURAL ALLIANCE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +95%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Baltimore Corps Inc

To cultivate career advancement opportunities for local talent, facilitate talent acquisition for local employers, increase access to capital for local entrepreneurs' social ventures, and foster cross-sector collaboration to address city…

Employment
2
Howard County Chamber of Commerce

To represent the business community of howard county, maryland

—
3
Greater Baybrook Alliance Inc

Greater Baybrook Alliance GBA is a non-profit community development organization whose mission is to act as a catalyst and conduit for equitable development and reinvestment in the Brooklyn, Brooklyn Park, Curtis Bay neighborhoods and…

Community Improvement
4
Greater Baltimore Committee Inc

Greater Baltimore Committee, Inc. is a not-for-profit, civic-interest corporation comprised of business and professional organizations located within the Greater Baltimore Area. Its purpose is to provide a strong, unified and effective…

—
5
Baltimore Area Health Education Center

To eliminate health disparities by educating and strengthening the health care workforce. bahec provides interdisciplinary education programs that bridge academic, healthcare, and community settings to transform the health of underserved…

Health
6
Metropolitan Baltimore Council of Afl-Cio Unions

The council was organized for the purpose of providing its members with adequate representation in various union related matters.

—
7
Economic Alliance of Greater Baltimore Foundation
—
8
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians Inc

Johns hopkins community physicians, inc (jhcp), a valued member of johns hopkins medicine, is a network of medical practices strategically positioned throughout communities in maryland and dc. we strive to meet the needs of each community…

—
9
Baltimore Development Corporation

The baltimore development corporation (bdc) is a non-profit organization that serves as the economic development agency for the city of baltimore. bdc's mission is to grow the city's economy in an inclusive, equitable manner by retaining,…

Community Improvement
10
Maryland Center On Economic Policy Inc

The maryland center on economic policy advances innovative policy ideas to foster broad prosperity and help our state be the standard-bearer for responsible public policy.

Social Science
11
Southbridge Medical Advisory Council Inc

Provider of primary health care to residents of wilmington and new castle county, delaware.

—
12
Blue Water Baltimore

To restore the quality of baltimore's rivers, streams and harbor to foster a healthy environment, a strong economy, and thriving communities.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baltimore Medical System Inc; the most unlike its peers is Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOHNS HOPKINS HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION: $6,761,000 · HealthJOHNS HOPKINS HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATIONBEHAVORIAL HEALTH SYSTEMS BALTIMORE: $2,473,456 · HealthBEHAVORIAL HEALTH SYSTEMS BALTIMOREJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $2,000,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UN…+1 more: $10,750 · EducationBALTIMORE MEDICAL SYSTEM INC: $1,572,165 · OtherBALTIMORE MEDIC…DUNDALK RENAISSANCE CORPORATION: $295,000 · OtherDUNDALK RENAISS…+6 more: $70,325 · OtherSOUTHEAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $880,000 · PhilanthropyCREATIVE ALLIANCE INC: $63,750 · Arts & CultureMEDICAL EDUCATION RESOURCES INITIATIVE FOR TEENS INC: $33,000 · Youth DevelopmentBUDDIES INC ELAINE WELKIE: $5,090 · Youth Development
Health$9,234,456Education$2,010,750Other$1,937,490Philanthropy$880,000Arts & Culture$63,750Youth Development$38,090

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOHNS HOPKINS HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION: $6,761,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBEHAVORIAL HEALTH SYSTEMS BALTIMORE: $2,473,456 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $2,000,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $880,000 over 8y, 5.2% of budgetDUNDALK RENAISSANCE CORPORATION: $295,000 over 7y, 6.5% of budgetCREATIVE ALLIANCE INC: $63,750 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetMEDICAL EDUCATION RESOURCES INITIATIVE FOR TEENS INC: $33,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetESSEX-MIDDLE RIVER WHITE MARSH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $30,300 over 4y, 6.8% of budgetSISTERS TOGETHER AND REACHING INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BALTIMORE COUNTY FOUNDATION INC: $10,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKENT CULTURAL ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetBUDDIES INC ELAINE WELKIE: $5,090 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetBALTIMORE COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $5,025 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSTRONG CITY BALTIMORE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The United Way of Cen…The Harry and Jeanett…Baltimore Community F…Johns Hopkins Univers…Family League of Balt…Baltimore Civic Fund …Associated Jewish Cha…T Rowe Price Program …National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The United Way of Central Maryland IncMD19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · Johns Hopkins University · Family League of Baltimore City Inc · Baltimore Civic Fund Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Southeast Community Development Corporation Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Kent Cultural Alliance Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Essex-Middle River White Marsh Chamber of Commerce: 14% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Baltimore Medical System Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Behavorial Health Systems Baltimore: 1% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home