· Public charity
Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center Inc
Johns hopkins bayview medical center's department of medicine is committed to the practice of primary and specialty medical care, the teaching of medical students, residents, fellows, allied health professionals, and physicians, research and development in basic science, clinical care, health services delivery, and medical education,…
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
- $250k+2 grants · $2.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BALTIMORE MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC | $1,572,165 |
| BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM BALTIMORE | $771,137 |
| SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | $100,000 |
| CREATIVE ALLIANCE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JHJOHNS HOPKINS HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION2× · 2020–2021 · $6.8M · revenue +65%
- BHBEHAVORIAL HEALTH SYSTEMS BALTIMORE4× · 2022–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +36%
- SCSOUTHEAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC8× · 2017–2025 · $880k · revenue +266%
Funded once
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $2.0M · revenue +26%- MEMEDICAL EDUCATION RESOURCES INITIATIVE FOR TEENS INCone grant, 2017 · $33k · revenue -79%
- KCKENT CULTURAL ALLIANCE INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +95%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To cultivate career advancement opportunities for local talent, facilitate talent acquisition for local employers, increase access to capital for local entrepreneurs' social ventures, and foster cross-sector collaboration to address city…
To represent the business community of howard county, maryland
Greater Baltimore Committee, Inc. is a not-for-profit, civic-interest corporation comprised of business and professional organizations located within the Greater Baltimore Area. Its purpose is to provide a strong, unified and effective…
Greater Baybrook Alliance GBA is a non-profit community development organization whose mission is to act as a catalyst and conduit for equitable development and reinvestment in the Brooklyn, Brooklyn Park, Curtis Bay neighborhoods and…
To eliminate health disparities by educating and strengthening the health care workforce. bahec provides interdisciplinary education programs that bridge academic, healthcare, and community settings to transform the health of underserved…
The council was organized for the purpose of providing its members with adequate representation in various union related matters.
Johns hopkins community physicians, inc (jhcp), a valued member of johns hopkins medicine, is a network of medical practices strategically positioned throughout communities in maryland and dc. we strive to meet the needs of each community…
The baltimore development corporation (bdc) is a non-profit organization that serves as the economic development agency for the city of baltimore. bdc's mission is to grow the city's economy in an inclusive, equitable manner by retaining,…
The maryland center on economic policy advances innovative policy ideas to foster broad prosperity and help our state be the standard-bearer for responsible public policy.
Provider of primary health care to residents of wilmington and new castle county, delaware.
To restore the quality of baltimore's rivers, streams and harbor to foster a healthy environment, a strong economy, and thriving communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baltimore Medical System Inc and the most unlike its peers is Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BEHAVORIAL HEALTH SYSTEMS BALTIMORE ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE MEDICAL SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC ↗
- Who funds DUNDALK RENAISSANCE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CREATIVE ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL EDUCATION RESOURCES INITIATIVE FOR TEENS INC ↗
- Who funds ESSEX-MIDDLE RIVER WHITE MARSH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds SISTERS TOGETHER AND REACHING INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BALTIMORE COUNTY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KENT CULTURAL ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds BUDDIES INC ELAINE WELKIE ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds STRONG CITY BALTIMORE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · Johns Hopkins University · Family League of Baltimore City Inc · Baltimore Civic Fund Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Southeast Community Development Corporation Inc — 35% of income from government
- Kent Cultural Alliance Inc — 27% of income from government
- Essex-Middle River White Marsh Chamber of Commerce — 14% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Baltimore Medical System Inc — 8% of income from government
- Behavorial Health Systems Baltimore — 1% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.