Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

John P and Anne Welsh McNulty Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
198
Grants FY2024still arriving
25
States reached
$949k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Education$5.1MSocial Science$3.8MPhilanthropy$3.0MInternational$2.3MHealth$1.1MEnvironment$961kArts & Culture$848kPublic Benefit$540kOther$0
02FY2024 · 198 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k48 grants · $205k
  • $10k–50k124 grants · $2.6M
  • $50k–250k23 grants · $2.2M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
$19,450
Median grant
25
States reached
$42M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASPEN INSTITUTE$948,906
HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION$374,981
NAPLES CHILDREN & EDUCATION FOUNDATION$269,000
HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION$221,777
HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION$221,618
NEO PHILANTHROPY$199,970
THOUSAND CURRENTS$199,815
NCH HEATHCARE$100,000
CHILD MIND INSTITUTE$100,000
NAPLES CHILDREN & EDUCATION FOUNDATION$100,000
ASPEN INSTITUTE$99,781
ST JOSEPHS UNIVERSITY$84,540
THE FRIENDSHIP BENCH INC$75,000
RESILIENCE FORCE$75,000
OMPRAKASH FOUNDATION$75,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $527k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WAKAMI FOUNDATION: $25k → 5%REPOWER FUND: $15k → 11%BLACK OUTSIDE INC: $15k → 16%HISPANIC ALLIANCE: $35k → 10%WHITE MEN FOR RACIAL JUSTICE: $15k → 18%REALIZE IMPACT: $15k → 10%GLOBAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND ASSISTANCE (GERA): $5k → 12%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES: $25k → 19%WAKAMI FOUNDATION: $20k → 5%REPOWER FUND: $10k → 11%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $75k → 23%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES: $25k → 19%WAKAMI FOUNDATION: $10k → 5%REPOWER FUND: $8k → 11%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $75k → 23%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES: $25k → 19%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $10k → 23%BAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES: $25k → 10%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $5k → 23%CHIPS: $2k → 20%COMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE: $2k → 20%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $50k → 10%SHELTER FOR ABUSED WOMEN & CHILDREN: $10k → 10%GLASSWING INTERNATIONAL USA: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
TN
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$17M · 90 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

90 repeat relationships — 69 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 65 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

90
75

Total granted

$17M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+2%

Still filing today

81%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +159%
  • TH
    THE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +24%
  • NC
    NAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +277%

Funded once

  • HF
    HEARTLAND FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $150k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $125k
  • AM
    ASPEN MUSIC FESTIVAL AND SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $62k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
2
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
3
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
4
Co-Impact Philanthropic Funds Inc

Philanthropic collaborative focused on improving lives through just & inclusive systems change.

Philanthropy
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
7
Partnersglobal

Partnersglobal (partners) works through a global network to support local leaders and create partnerships that transform conflict, strengthen democratic institutions, and achieve sustainable development.

International
8
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
9
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
10
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
11
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
12
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Latinos for Education Inc and the most unlike its peers is Paramahamsa Charitable Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsYouth Development ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Youth Development CentersLocal Food System Organizat…Community Arts CentersDomestic Violence ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Policy Research and AdvocacyCommunity College Foundatio…Independent K-12 SchoolsImmigrant Worker SupportFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Environmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%15%5–10yr19%27%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%31%10–20yr16%7%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%30%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/166
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,399

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

160 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 160 of the 241 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
159/160
Grantees still filing
83/160
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $3,762,682 · Social ScienceTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE I…THE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $1,786,690 · EducationTHE HUNTER COLLEGE F…SAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY — $760,262 · EducationSAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVE…+28 more — $1,150,100 · Education+28 moreUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA WHARTON — $1,120,857 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA WHARTONCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC — $459,814 · OtherCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INCBRAVEN INC — $300,959 · Other+125 more — $5,114,598 · Other+125 moreNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC — $1,522,277 · PhilanthropyNAPLES CHI…OMPRAKASH INC — $150,000 · PhilanthropyOMPRAKASH …TIDES FOUNDATION — $80,450 · PhilanthropySOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS — $75,000 · Philanthropy+4 more — $110,000 · Philanthropy+4 moreTHOUSAND CURRENTS — $599,725 · InternationalTHOUSAND …ASHESI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $355,717 · InternationalASHESI UN…AMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME — $152,525 · InternationalAMERICAN …FRIENDS OF BULUNGULA INC — $109,806 · InternationalFRIENDS O…Corner of Love Ministries — $85,000 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INC — $70,000 · InternationalGLOBAL COMMUNITIES — $65,000 · International+11 more — $165,000 · International+11 moreNEO Philanthropy Inc — $801,540 · Public BenefitB LAB COMPANY — $150,910 · Public BenefitPICO California — $50,000 · Public Benefit+1 more — $10,000 · Public BenefitSolutions Project Inc — $253,133 · EnvironmentRARE — $219,837 · EnvironmentMOTHERS OUT FRONT INC — $160,000 · EnvironmentWINDWARD FUND — $150,000 · EnvironmentGLOBAL WARMING MITIGATION PROJECT — $75,000 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUND — $70,000 · EnvironmentNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $40,000 · Environment+4 more — $38,250 · Environment
Social Science$3,762,682Education$3,697,052Other$6,996,228Philanthropy$1,937,727International$1,602,773Public Benefit$1,012,450Environment$1,006,220

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $3,762,682 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $1,786,690 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC — $1,522,277 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc — $801,540 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY — $760,262 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHOUSAND CURRENTS — $599,725 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC — $459,814 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetASHESI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $355,717 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetBRAVEN INC — $300,959 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSolutions Project Inc — $253,133 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetRARE — $219,837 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES — $215,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC — $208,921 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEYELLIANCE INC — $190,417 over 4y, 7.9% of budgetMOTHERS OUT FRONT INC — $160,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP BENCH INC — $160,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME — $152,525 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetB LAB COMPANY — $150,910 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWINDWARD FUND — $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOMPRAKASH INC — $150,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetEDESIA INC — $149,713 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ORGANIZING — $145,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC — $140,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC — $130,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetALLIANCE FOR THE COLLABORATION WITH THE HISPANIC COMMUNITY — $120,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF BULUNGULA INC — $109,806 over 4y, 42% of budgetBARD COLLEGE — $105,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH RESOLVES AMERICA — $100,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetAVASARA FOUNDATION FKA THE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION OF INDIA — $90,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetSURGE INSTITUTE — $90,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCorner of Love Ministries — $85,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $80,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetECHOING GREEN INC — $80,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS — $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetRESILIENCE FORCE — $75,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGLOBAL WARMING MITIGATION PROJECT — $75,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetLATINOS FOR EDUCATION INC — $75,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetBROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY — $75,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEAL TRAFFICKING INC — $70,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC — $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL COMMUNITIES — $65,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHESTNUT HILL COLLEGE — $65,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE ENTERPRISE CORPORATION — $60,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWAKAMI FOUNDATION — $55,000 over 3y, 12% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THOUSAND CURRENTS ↗
  • Who funds CHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds ASHESI UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Solutions Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds RARE ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC ↗
  • Who funds EYELLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds MOTHERS OUT FRONT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP BENCH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY IN ROME ↗
  • Who funds B LAB COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds WINDWARD FUND ↗
  • Who funds OMPRAKASH INC ↗
  • Who funds EDESIA INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ORGANIZING ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR THE COLLABORATION WITH THE HISPANIC COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BULUNGULA INC ↗
  • Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds HIGH RESOLVES AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds AVASARA FOUNDATION FKA THE LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION OF INDIA ↗
  • Who funds SURGE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Corner of Love Ministries ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…The Ford FoundationThe Skoll FoundationAmalgamated Charitabl…The Aspen Institute I…WK Kellogg FoundationSkoll FundThe William & Flora H…The Rockefeller Found…Tides FoundationImpactassetsincThe David and Lucile …
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA32.7× affinity37 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Ford Foundation · The Skoll Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Aspen Institute Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Skoll Fund · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · The Rockefeller Foundation · Tides Foundation · Impactassetsinc · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization John P and Anne Welsh McNulty Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Global Communities — 44% of income from government
  • Center for Urban Families Inc — 36% of income from government
  • College for Social Innovation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • Centre for Wildlife Studies Inc — 20% of income from government
  • Eastie Farm Inc — 13% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc — 3% of income from government
  • The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc — 2% of income from government
  • All Our Kin Inc — 1% of income from government
  • New World Symphony Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Gulfshore Playhouse Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Friends of Rookery Bay Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Saint Peter's University — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
32report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 241 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines