Skip to content

· Private foundation

John J and Ann E Mariotti Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$223kEducation$29kInternational$24kHealth$13kHuman Services$10kRecreation & Sports$8kFood & Nutrition$2kCommunity Improvement$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$2,600
Median grant
5
States reached
$811k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAXVILLE CHRISTIAN CHURCH$16,000
SAVE INC$4,000
FOX VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACTION$3,500
WAYSIDE CROSS MINISTRIES$3,500
GLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK$3,000
MOODY RADIO$3,000
RETT SYNDROME FOUNDATION$2,600
HARVEST CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$2,000
HARVEST BIBLE CHAPEL$2,000
ONE LINE CHURCH$2,000
WORLD RELIEF$1,600
HIGHPOINT CHURCH$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
BEATS-INCORG$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FOX VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACTION: $10k → 8%FOX VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACTION: $4k → 8%FOX VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACTION: $2k → 8%FOX VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACTION: $2k → 8%FOX VALLEY CHRISTIAN ACTION: $2k → 8%Fox Valley Christian Action: $200 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
NV
IN
OH
CA
CO
MO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
SC
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$229k · 14 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
35

Total granted

$229k
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+39%

Still filing today

29%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalReligionEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    Riverwoods Christian Center dba Fox Valley Christian Action
    6× · 2018–2024 · $19k · revenue +141%
  • MA
    Missionary Athletes International and Charlotte Eagles Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $8k · revenue +22%
  • HB
    HOPE BUILDERS MINISTRIES
    4× · 2018–2021 · $4k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • HC
    Highland Christian Academy
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • NH
    NEW HOPE CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • HA
    HCA Academy
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
2
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion
3
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
4
Message to All Nations Man

To reach out with the message of the gospel of jesus to the last, least, and the lost

Human Services
5
Amazing Facts International

To proclaim to the world the everlasting gospel of revelation 14:6-12 and to encourage revival in the remnant church by leading people to embrace salvation by faith in jesus, to establish them in the church, and to disciple all believers…

Religion
6
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

—
7
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
8
Euromedia Missions
—
9
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
10
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
11
Mission Partners for Christ Aka Community Health Initiatives
Community Improvement
12
Faith Speaks World Outreach

World outreach

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Riverwoods Christian Center dba Fox Valley Christian Action; the most unlike its peers is The Foundry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIBERTY IN LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $57,700 · OtherLIBERTY IN LIFE MINISTRIES INCMAXVILLE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $47,000 · OtherMAXVILLE CHRISTIAN CHURCHHIGHPOINT CHURCH: $17,500 · OtherHIGHPOINT CHURCHHARVEST CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $17,000 · OtherHARVEST CHRISTIAN ACADEMYWAYSIDE CROSS MINISTRIES: $16,500 · OtherWAYSIDE CROSS MINISTRIESHighland Christian Academy: $10,000 · OtherNEW HOPE CHURCH: $10,000 · Other+36 more: $92,267 · Other+36 moreS A V E INC: $17,000 · InternationalHOPE BUILDERS MINISTRIES: $3,750 · InternationalWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $1,600 · InternationalRiverwoods Christian Center dba Fox Valley Christian Action: $19,200 · Human ServicesGLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC: $3,000 · EducationThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $3,000 · EducationThe Foundry Inc: $2,000 · EducationSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,000 · ReligionThe Christian Broadcasting Network Inc: $1,000 · ReligionFayette Pregnancy Resource Center Inc: $2,000 · HealthCrossroads Kids Club: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$267,967International$22,350Human Services$19,200Education$8,000Religion$3,000Health$2,000Youth Development$1,000Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRiverwoods Christian Center dba Fox Valley Christian Action: $19,200 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetS A V E INC: $17,000 over 7y, 8.8% of budgetMissionary Athletes International and Charlotte Eagles Inc: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE BUILDERS MINISTRIES: $3,750 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFayette Pregnancy Resource Center Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Foundry Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCrossroads Kids Club: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Christian Broadcasting Network Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Riverwoods Christian Center dba Fox Valley Christian Action ↗
  • Who funds S A V E INC ↗
  • Who funds Missionary Athletes International and Charlotte Eagles Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOPE BUILDERS MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Fayette Pregnancy Resource Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds The Foundry Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tyndale House MinistriesIL15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tyndale House Ministries · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Northern Illinois Food Bank · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John J and Ann E Mariotti Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John J and Ann E Mariotti Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 67%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: 67% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to John J and Ann E Mariotti Foundation?

Find your warmest path to John J and Ann E Mariotti Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John J and Ann E Mariotti’s filings →

More from the funding graph