Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Wauna Harman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$1.0M
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

67% of John and Wauna Harman Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Yakima Valley Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 8 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year John and Wauna Harman Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $2M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’17
9
’18
11
’19
12
’20
11
’21
12
’22
10
’23
9
’24
8
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$3.7MPhilanthropy$2.7MCommunity Improvement$2.0MHuman Services$206kEnvironment$150kCivil Rights$125kPublic Safety & Disaster$85kArts & Culture$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $117k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $278k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.3M
$25,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REIMAGINE INC$1,000,000
CENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS$250,000
PAUSE$100,000
COALITION TO TRANSFORM ADVANCED CARE (C-TAC)$77,500
WELLNESS HOUSE$50,000
PROJECT GUARDIANSHIP$50,000
END WELL FOUNDATION$40,000
DUKE DIVINITY SCHOOL$25,000
HOSPICE FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$25,000
SOUTHEAST WASHINGTON OFFICE OF AGING AND LONG TERM CARE$16,660
CENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS$10,000
COALITION TO TRANSFORM ADVANCED CARE (C-TAC)$5,000
HARMAN CENTER$2,500
SOUTH CAROLINA NURSES FOUNDATION$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,940
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $332k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 30% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMONWEAL: $88k → 8%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING: $6k → 9%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING: $8k → 7%MONTGOMERY HOSPICE: $95k → 8%COASTAL HOSPICE: $51k → 13%COMMONWEAL: $10k → 8%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING: $3k → 7%MONTGOMERY HOSPICE: $17k → 8%COASTAL HOSPICE: $50k → 13%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING: $3k → 7%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING: $950 → 7%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING: $900 → 7%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING: $900 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
PA
CA
MO
VA
MD
KS
NC
SC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 32% of John and Wauna Harman Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

John and Wauna Harman Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.8M · 24 repeat orgs$679k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
7

Total granted

$5.8M
$485k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+6%

Still filing today

67%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationPublic Safety & DisasterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HOSPICE FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $242k · revenue +51%
  • Public Health Institute
    3× · 2019–2022 · $145k · revenue +114%
  • PS
    PEACEKEEPER SOCIETY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $125k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • YP
    YAKAMA POWER
    one grant, 2023 · $150k
  • RM
    REEL MEDICINE MEDIA
    one grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +6%
  • PS
    PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY MILTON S H
    one grant, 2017 · $90k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Caldwell Hospice and Palliative Care Inc Dba Amorem

Provide end of life care through the hospice philosophy

Human Services
2
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
3
Hospice & Palliative Care Charlotte Region

Our mission is to relieve suffering and improve the quality and dignity of life through compassionate hospice care at the end of life, palliative care for those with advanced illness, and through community education.

Human Services
4
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
5
Kaiser Foundation for the Advancement of Integrated Health Care

Kaiser foundation for the advancement of integrated health care is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) advocacy organization to engage in proactive advocacy to promote understanding of the benefits of integrated care and coverage, and support of the…

Health
6
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
7
Skagit Hospice Foundation

To fund the program and services of hospice of the nothwest to ensure dignified and compassionate care is available to anyone coping with a life-limiting diagnosis.one size doesn't always fit all, especially when it comes to quality of…

Health
8
National Coalition On Health Care

The mission of the national coalition on health care (nchc) is to support research and analysis, develop and promote policy solutions, build consensus, and engage the public in order to ensure that america has a high quality health system…

Health
9
Global Partners in Care

The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.

International
10
National Coalition for Hospice and Palliative Care Inc

The national coalition for hospice and palliative care works to improve the care of people with serious or life-limiting illnesses by convening the field, advocating for equitable policies and improved health outcomes, establishing best…

Health
11
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
12
Kfhpw Holdings

Supporting kaiser permanente organizations which provide high-quality, affordable health care services to improve the health of our members and the communities we serve.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Reel Medicine Media. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
19/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REIMAGINE INC: $2,575,000 · OtherREIMAGINE INCCENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS INC: $671,839 · OtherCENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS INCWellness House: $575,845 · OtherWellness HouseHOSPICE FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $241,563 · OtherDUKE UNIVERSITY DIVINITY SCHOOL: $225,000 · OtherSOUTHEAST WASHINGTON OFFICE OF AGING AND LONG TERM CARE ADVISORY: $188,771 · Other+13 more: $758,684 · Other+13 moreYAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,440,000 · PhilanthropyYAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATI…PLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC: $125,000 · Philanthropy+3 more: $17,150 · PhilanthropyPublic Health Institute: $145,000 · HealthCoalition To Transform Advanced Car: $125,000 · HealthEND WELL FOUNDATION: $90,000 · HealthTHE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $77,047 · HealthHEART TONES INC: $47,000 · Health+1 more: $1,100 · HealthMONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC: $111,500 · Human ServicesCOASTAL HOSPICE: $100,885 · Human ServicesCOMMONWEAL: $97,920 · Human ServicesGRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC: $22,050 · Human ServicesREEL MEDICINE MEDIA: $150,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationMOCKINGBIRD INCUBATOR: $10,000 · EducationPEACEKEEPER SOCIETY: $125,000 · Youth DevelopmentFJC: $85,000 · Crime & LegalCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $85,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$5,236,702Philanthropy$2,582,150Health$485,147Human Services$332,355Education$210,000Youth Development$125,000Crime & Legal$85,000Public Safety & Disaster$85,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,440,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS INC: $671,839 over 7y, 23% of budgetWellness House: $575,845 over 9y, 28% of budgetHOSPICE FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $241,563 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetREEL MEDICINE MEDIA: $150,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetPublic Health Institute: $145,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPEACEKEEPER SOCIETY: $125,000 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCoalition To Transform Advanced Car: $125,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetMONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC: $111,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOASTAL HOSPICE: $100,885 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMONWEAL: $97,920 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetEND WELL FOUNDATION: $90,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetCENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC: $85,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $77,047 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPROJECT GUARDIANSHIP INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE GLEANINGS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC: $22,050 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTHROPY INC: $11,900 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMOCKINGBIRD INCUBATOR: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNorthern California Grantmakers: $4,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA NURSES FOUNDATI: $2,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR COMPASSIONATE CARE OF CALIFORNIA: $1,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEAK GRANTMAKING INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR PRACTICAL BIOETHICS INC ↗
  • Who funds Wellness House ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds REEL MEDICINE MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds Public Health Institute ↗
  • Who funds PEACEKEEPER SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Coalition To Transform Advanced Car ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL HOSPICE ↗
  • Who funds COMMONWEAL ↗
  • Who funds END WELL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FJC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT GUARDIANSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GLEANINGS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HEART TONES INC ↗
  • Who funds GRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
  • Who funds MOCKINGBIRD INCUBATOR ↗
  • Who funds Northern California Grantmakers ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH CAROLINA NURSES FOUNDATI ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR COMPASSIONATE CARE OF CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds PEAK GRANTMAKING INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The y C Hohelen and Michael Chiang FoundationNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The y C Hohelen and Michael Chiang Foundation · Stupski Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Wauna Harman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Wauna Harman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to John and Wauna Harman Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to John and Wauna Harman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on John and Wauna Harman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph