Skip to content

California · Private foundation

John and Wauna Harman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
16
Grants FY2024
14
Organizations funded FY2023
21%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

67% of John and Wauna Harman Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Yakima Valley Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 8 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year John and Wauna Harman Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $2M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’17
9
’18
11
’19
12
’20
11
’21
12
’22
10
’23
9
’24
8
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2024
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$1,000,000
Organizations funded a year
9 to 16
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
7
Total assets, FY2024
$3.3M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 21% of the organizations John and Wauna Harman Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 39% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $310k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving14$1.7M36%
FY202314$788k21%
FY202216$816k19%
FY202114$596k21%
FY202014$461k29%
FY201914$338k21%
FY201811$285k45%
FY20179$367kn/a
95% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$3.7MPhilanthropy$2.7MCommunity Improvement$2.0MHuman Services$206kEnvironment$150kCivil Rights$125kPublic Safety & Disaster$85kArts & Culture$50kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
PA
CA
MO
VA
MD
KS
NC
SC
DC
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Center for Practical Bioethics Inc$671,839723%
Wellness House$575,845928%
Hospice Foundation of America Inc$241,56353%
Southeast Washington Office of Aging and Long Term Care Advisory$188,7718n/a
Yakama Power$150,0001n/a
Reel Medicine Media$150,000122%
Public Health Institute$145,00030%
Peacekeeper Society$125,00039%
Coalition To Transform Advanced Car$125,00046%
Montgomery Hospice Inc$111,50020%
Show all 26 grantees
All grantees of John and Wauna Harman Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Center for Practical Bioethics Inc$671,839723%
Wellness House$575,845928%
Hospice Foundation of America Inc$241,56353%
Southeast Washington Office of Aging and Long Term Care Advisory$188,7718n/a
Yakama Power$150,0001n/a
Reel Medicine Media$150,000122%
Public Health Institute$145,00030%
Peacekeeper Society$125,00039%
Coalition To Transform Advanced Car$125,00046%
Montgomery Hospice Inc$111,50020%
Coastal Hospice$100,88520%
Commonweal$97,92021%
End Well Foundation$90,00046%
Center for Disaster Philanthropy Inc$85,00030%
The Memorial Foundation$77,04721%
Project Guardianship Inc$50,00011%
The Gleanings Foundation$50,000149%
Duke University$50,00020%
Heart Tones Inc$47,0001n/a
Grantmakers in Aging Inc$22,05070%
National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc$11,90070%
Mockingbird Incubator$10,00011%
Northern California Grantmakers$4,50060%
South Carolina Nurses Foundati$2,50013%
Coalition for Compassionate Care of California$1,10040%
Peak Grantmaking Inc$75010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 11 recipients with no EIN on record ($3.3M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

John and Wauna Harman Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 2 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 23 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCenter for Practical Bioethics Inc: $671,839 over 7y, 23% of budgetWellness House: $575,845 over 9y, 28% of budgetHospice Foundation of America Inc: $241,563 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetReel Medicine Media: $150,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetPublic Health Institute: $145,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPeacekeeper Society: $125,000 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetCoalition To Transform Advanced Car: $125,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetMontgomery Hospice Inc: $111,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCoastal Hospice: $100,885 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCommonweal: $97,920 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetEnd Well Foundation: $90,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetCenter for Disaster Philanthropy Inc: $85,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetThe Memorial Foundation: $77,047 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetProject Guardianship Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetThe Gleanings Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetDuke University: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGrantmakers in Aging Inc: $22,050 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetNational Center for Family Philanthropy Inc: $11,900 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMockingbird Incubator: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNorthern California Grantmakers: $4,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSouth Carolina Nurses Foundati: $2,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCoalition for Compassionate Care of California: $1,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPeak Grantmaking Inc: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 23.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The y C Hohelen and Michael Chiang FoundationNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The y C Hohelen and Michael Chiang Foundation · Stupski Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare John and Wauna Harman Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to John and Wauna Harman Foundation?

Find your warmest path to John and Wauna Harman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About John and Wauna Harman Foundation

How much does John and Wauna Harman Foundation give?
John and Wauna Harman Foundation reported 16 grants totaling $1,657,100 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 16 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does John and Wauna Harman Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (41%), Philanthropy (29%), Community Improvement (22%).
Who are John and Wauna Harman Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Center for Practical Bioethics Inc ($672k), Wellness House ($576k), Hospice Foundation of America Inc ($242k).
Does John and Wauna Harman Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 21% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does John and Wauna Harman Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as John and Wauna Harman Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The y C Hohelen and Michael Chiang Foundation, Stupski Foundation, Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc.
Where is John and Wauna Harman Foundation based?
John and Wauna Harman Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John and Wauna Harman’s filings →

More from the funding graph