Skip to content

Illinois · Private foundation

John and Gwen Smart Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.1M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
19
Grants FY2025
13
Organizations funded FY2024
23%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$100,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$800,000
Organizations funded a year
13 to 19
FY2019 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
5
Total assets, FY2025
$39M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 23% of the organizations John and Gwen Smart Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 11% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving16$3.0M19%
FY202413$1.9M23%
FY202313$2.0M8%
FY202215$2.2M7%
FY202116$1.8M6%
FY202019$2.0M32%
FY201919$2.2Mn/a
95% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$6.5MHealth$3.2MEnvironment$2.7MHuman Services$2.1MFood & Nutrition$971kArts & Culture$685kAnimals$680kRecreation & Sports$470kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 26 grantees
All grantees of John and Gwen Smart Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Usher III Initiative Inc$2,585,000646%
New York Women's Foundation Inc$2,570,00074%
California Rangeland Trust$971,00052%
Santa Barbara Botanic Garden$900,00053%
The Rogosin Institute Inc$820,00050%
Creativity Explored Inc$756,00074%
The Santa Barbara Bird Sanctuary$750,000742%
Cornell University$530,89560%
American Nurses Foundation Inc$460,00023%
Women in Need Inc$454,10570%
Kqed Inc$425,00070%
Three Jewels Outreach Center Inc$322,0007n/a
Cg Jung Institute of San Francisco$250,00026%
Coastal Ranches Conservancy$190,000257%
The San Francisco Bay Trail Project$160,0001n/a
Save The Bay$150,00015%
Echoing Green Inc$140,00031%
Day One of New York Inc$130,00071%
Cultural Activism International Project Inc$125,0002n/a
Pacific Currents Inc$100,000194%
Egoscue Foundation$100,0001n/a
Lighthawk$100,00016%
The Nature Conservancy of California$100,0001n/a
Burlingame Library Foundation$100,000125%
High Plateau Humane Society$30,000110%
Middle Way School$20,00011%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($1.8M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

John and Gwen Smart Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 5 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 21 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUsher III Initiative Inc: $2,585,000 over 6y, 46% of budgetNew York Women's Foundation Inc: $2,570,000 over 7y, 4.0% of budgetCalifornia Rangeland Trust: $971,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetSanta Barbara Botanic Garden: $900,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetThe Rogosin Institute Inc: $820,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCreativity Explored Inc: $756,000 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetThe Santa Barbara Bird Sanctuary: $750,000 over 7y, 42% of budgetCornell University: $530,895 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Nurses Foundation Inc: $460,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetWomen in Need Inc: $454,105 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetKqed Inc: $425,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCg Jung Institute of San Francisco: $250,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetCoastal Ranches Conservancy: $190,000 over 2y, 57% of budgetSave The Bay: $150,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetEchoing Green Inc: $140,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetDay One of New York Inc: $130,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetPacific Currents Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 94% of budgetLighthawk: $100,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetBurlingame Library Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetHigh Plateau Humane Society: $30,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetMiddle Way School: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 21.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare John and Gwen Smart Foundation with peer funders

About John and Gwen Smart Foundation

How much does John and Gwen Smart Foundation give?
John and Gwen Smart Foundation reported 19 grants totaling $4,055,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 13 and 19 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2024.
What does John and Gwen Smart Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (34%), Health (17%), Environment (14%).
Who are John and Gwen Smart Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2025: Usher III Initiative Inc ($2.6M), New York Women's Foundation Inc ($2.6M), California Rangeland Trust ($971k).
Does John and Gwen Smart Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 23% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does John and Gwen Smart Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as John and Gwen Smart Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The San Francisco Foundation, American Endowment Foundation, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc.
Where is John and Gwen Smart Foundation based?
John and Gwen Smart Foundation is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John and Gwen Smart’s filings →

More from the funding graph