Skip to content

· Private foundation

John and Engrid Meng Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
81
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$335k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$2.8MHealth$2.4MHuman Services$1.5MEducation$947kPhilanthropy$770kYouth Development$666kReligion$521kInternational$334kOther$0
02FY2024 · 81 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k42 grants · $76k
  • $10k–50k24 grants · $449k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+1 grant · $335k
$6,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREEN BAY$335,000
NEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC$200,000
GREATER GREEN BAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$200,000
CEREBRAL PALSY INC$169,500
BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION$155,000
CONNECTIONS FOR MENTAL WELLNESS$100,000
NEIGHBORWORKS GREEN BAY$100,000
FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC$100,000
HOWE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER$70,000
FIRST UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$68,200
GREATER GREEN BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$66,000
MAP INTERNATIONAL$61,500
OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC$60,000
UNITY HOSPICE$50,345
GREEN BAY NEIGHBORHOODS$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $969k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CAMP KESEM: $1k → 9%THE POLLINATION PROJECT: $1k → 10%CAMP KESEM: $1k → 9%GOLDEN HOUSE: $10k → 10%FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $100k → 11%FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $83k → 11%FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $75k → 11%FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $27k → 11%FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $21k → 11%FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $5k → 11%OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $61k → 10%OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $60k → 10%OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $50k → 10%OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $50k → 10%OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $45k → 10%OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $35k → 10%OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $31k → 10%JOURNEY TO ADULT SUCCESS: $6k → 10%OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING INC: $5k → 10%UNITY HOSPICE: $171k → 10%UNITY HOSPICE: $50k → 10%UNITY HOSPICE: $24k → 10%UNITY HOSPICE: $12k → 10%UNITY HOSPICE: $9k → 10%UNITY HOSPICE: $7k → 10%UNITY HOSPICE: $4k → 10%UNITY HOSPICE: $2k → 10%GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $21k → 10%GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $500 → 10%GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $500 → 10%GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $500 → 10%GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $500 → 10%GREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $500 → 10%FOSTER THE VILLAGE: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
IA
IN
PA
CA
UT
MO
KY
VA
MD
NC
DC
OK
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10.0M · 102 repeat orgs$204k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

102 repeat relationships: 65 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

102
40

Total granted

$10.0M
$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+33%

Still filing today

59%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $121k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GG
    GREATER GREEN BAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +78%
  • CP
    CEREBRAL PALSY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +43%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $605k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • MT
    MEYER THEATRE CORPORATION
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +5%
  • F
    FOUNDATIONS
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE WILDLIFE SANCTUARY
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
3
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
4
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
7
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
8
Goldey-Beacom College

Empowering learners to achieve excellence by linking knowledge to practice.

Education
9
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
10
Wisconsin Bankers Association

We actively advocate, educate and support our members to help them positively impact the wisconsin communities they serve.

—
11
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
12
Goodwill Industries of North Central Wisconsin Inc

Eliminating barriers to employment by providing pathways for those who are underserved, underrepresented and disadvantaged who have a goal of building skills that lead to sustained employment and improved financial stability.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Heritage Hill Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

89 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 89 of the 159 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
88/89
Grantees still filing
66/89
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREATER GREEN BAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1,403,100 · OtherGREATER GREEN BAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITYTHE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $323,426 · OtherTHE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INCCONNECTIONS FOR MENTAL WELLNESS: $250,000 · OtherBELLIN COLLEGE INC: $232,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $226,668 · OtherMAP International Inc: $301,700 · OtherMAP International IncCURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC: $212,100 · Other+104 more: $2,239,714 · Other+104 moreNEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC: $515,600 · Housing & ShelterNEW COMMUNITY…NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF GREEN BAY INC: $469,702 · Housing & ShelterNEIGHBORHOOD …ECUMENICAL PARTNERSHIP FOR HOUSING INC: $272,100 · Housing & ShelterECUMENICAL PA…ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC: $55,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $3,000 · Housing & ShelterCEREBRAL PALSY INC: $1,179,500 · HealthCEREBRAL PAL…+4 more: $22,800 · HealthOPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVINGINC: $336,000 · Human ServicesOPTIONS FOR …FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $310,726 · Human ServicesFISH OF SANI…UNITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: $279,000 · Human ServicesUNITY LIMITE…ENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION & CARE INC: $111,000 · Human ServicesENCOMPASS EA…GOLDEN HOUSE INC: $96,000 · Human ServicesGOLDEN HOUSE…+7 more: $37,000 · Human ServicesGREATER GREEN BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $617,200 · PhilanthropyBROWN COUNTY UNITED WAY: $80,000 · PhilanthropyROTARY FOUNDATION OF GREEN BAY INC: $62,167 · Philanthropy+3 more: $27,600 · PhilanthropyBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC: $605,260 · Youth Development+2 more: $1,050 · Youth DevelopmentUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY FOUNDATION INC: $260,000 · EducationNORTHEAST WISCONSIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $94,600 · EducationOklahoma State University Foundation: $50,000 · EducationASPIRO INC: $30,600 · EducationNICHOLS COLLEGE: $18,000 · Education+12 more: $51,011 · Education
Other$5,188,708Housing & Shelter$1,315,402Health$1,202,300Human Services$1,169,726Philanthropy$786,967Youth Development$606,310Education$504,211

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER GREEN BAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $1,403,100 over 7y, 16% of budgetCEREBRAL PALSY INC: $1,179,500 over 8y, 6.2% of budgetGREATER GREEN BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $617,200 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC: $605,260 over 6y, 6.5% of budgetNEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC: $515,600 over 8y, 6.2% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF GREEN BAY INC: $469,702 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetOPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVINGINC: $336,000 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetTHE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $323,426 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetFISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $310,726 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetMAP International Inc: $301,700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: $279,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetECUMENICAL PARTNERSHIP FOR HOUSING INC: $272,100 over 8y, 11% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY FOUNDATION INC: $260,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetBELLIN COLLEGE INC: $232,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC: $212,100 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetHOWE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $165,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetGREEN BAY NEIGHBORHOODS: $150,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION & CARE INC: $111,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGOLDEN HOUSE INC: $96,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHEAST WISCONSIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $94,600 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetPAUL'S PANTRY INC: $86,100 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetBROWN COUNTY UNITED WAY: $80,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetROTARY FOUNDATION OF GREEN BAY INC: $62,167 over 7y, 9.2% of budgetST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC: $55,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGREEN BAY BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $51,102 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATIONS HEALTH & WHOLENESS INC: $33,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetDE PERE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $32,100 over 6y, 13% of budgetASPIRO INC: $30,600 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCASA OF BROWN COUNTY INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetBASIC NEEDS GIVING PARTNERSHIP INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER GREEN BAY YMCA INC: $23,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNICHOLS COLLEGE: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEYER THEATRE CORPORATION: $15,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetCURRY COLLEGE: $14,511 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWabash College: $13,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY: $12,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCOLLEGEREADY INC: $11,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC: $10,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NEVILLE PUBLIC MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $10,250 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBRAIN CENTER OF GREEN BAY INC: $10,100 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetNEW ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetBirder Studio Of Performing Arts Inc: $9,100 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetARMY WAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR CHILDHOOD SAFETY INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetJOURNEY TO ADULT SUCCESS INC: $6,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetSANIBEL-CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMentors International: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER GREEN BAY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds CEREBRAL PALSY INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER GREEN BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE BAY AND LAKES REGION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW COMMUNITY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF GREEN BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds OPTIONS FOR INDEPENDENT LIVINGINC ↗
  • Who funds THE BELLIN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC ↗
  • Who funds MAP International Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds ECUMENICAL PARTNERSHIP FOR HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - GREEN BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BELLIN COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds CURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOWE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN BAY NEIGHBORHOODS ↗
  • Who funds ENCOMPASS EARLY EDUCATION & CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST WISCONSIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PAUL'S PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds BROWN COUNTY UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY FOUNDATION OF GREEN BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST HOMELESS SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN BAY BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George Kress Foundation IncWI95.7× affinity44 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George Kress Foundation Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · K C Stock Foundation Inc · Schreiber Foods Foundation Inc · Schneider National Foundation Inc · Cornerstone Foundation of Northeastern Wisconsin Inc · De Pere Christian Outreach · Michael & Leanne Haddad Family Foundation Inc · Byron L Walter Family Trust Xxxxx0002 · Little Rapids Corporation - Egan Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization John and Engrid Meng Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from John and Engrid Meng Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Sanibel-Captiva Conservation Foundation: 4% of income from government
  • Curry College: 0% of income from government
  • Nichols College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to John and Engrid Meng Inc?

Find your warmest path to John and Engrid Meng Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 159 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on John and Engrid Meng’s filings →

More from the funding graph