Skip to content
Jhpiego Corporation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Jhpiego Corporation

Jhpiego creates and delivers transformative health care solutions that save lives.

$47M
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$5.9M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$159MInternational$137MEducation$51MEmployment$2.1MScience & Tech$2.0MYouth Development$809kReligion$607kCommunity Improvement$448kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 35 grants below total $19,626,073, the rows itemized in this filing. The $46,709,278 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $27,083,205 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $102k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $2.4M
  • $250k+11 grants · $17M
$172,518
Median grant
14
States reached
$236M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAVE THE CHILDREN$5,894,255
THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK$3,696,785
MCKINSEY & COMPANY INC WASHINGTON$2,326,743
PACT INC$1,398,283
COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC$760,123
THINK WELL LLC$751,167
PROGRAM FOR APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY (AKA PATH)$547,755
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER$518,451
VIAMO PBC$501,279
MANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH$444,917
AVENIR HEALTH INC (AKA FUTURES INSTITUTE)$275,225
INSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT$241,221
ZENYSIS TECHNOLOGIES INC$221,367
D-TREE INTERNATIONAL$212,813
MANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH$211,524
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $336k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SAINT BONIFACE HAITI FOUNDATION: $224k → 8%PROMUNDO-US: $67k → 14%PROMUNDO-US: $34k → 14%PROMUNDO-US: $11k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $27M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$19M · 71% · 228 grants

Stated purpose: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN MATERNAL AND CHILD SURVIVAL. · TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE WITH YOUTH-LED PROGRAMMING AT THE COMMUNITY LEVEL. · ADDRESS CRITICAL HUMAN RESOURCES CHALLENGES IN THE HEALTH SECTOR BY OPTIMIZING HEALTH WORKFORCE PRODUCTION, PERFORMANCE, AND MANAGEMENT.

South Asia$4.1M · 15% · 43 grants

Stated purpose: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN MATERNAL AND CHILD SURVIVAL. · TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO ORGANIZE THE 9TH NATIONAL YOUTH CONFERENCE ON FAMILY PLANNING. · TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN HI-MNCH.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$2.2M · 8% · 8 grants

Stated purpose: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE WITH SELF-INECTION. · TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN MATERNAL AND CHILD SURVIVAL. · TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE WITH THE EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF NON-COMMUNICABLE DISEASES.

East Asia and the Pacific$659k · 2% · 10 grants

Stated purpose: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN MATERNAL AND CHILD SURVIVAL.

Central America and the Caribbean$502k · 2% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN MATERNAL AND CHILD SURVIVAL.

Middle East and North Africa$281k · 1% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN MITIGATING THE IMPACT OF HIV. · TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN MATERNAL AND CHILD SURVIVAL.

South America$118k · 0% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN MATERNAL AND CHILD SURVIVAL. · TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE REQUIRED TO SUPPORT WORK UNDER THE ENHANCING GLOBAL HEALTH SECURITY

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Jhpiego Corporation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Jhpiego Corporationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 14% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$314M · 60 repeat orgs$3.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue -3% since the first grant, against -28% for those funded once.

60 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
17

Total granted

$314M
$3.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
-28%

Still filing today

57%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $803k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $107M · revenue +21%
  • THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2020–2023 · $8.9M · revenue +40%
  • MS
    MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
    4× · 2020–2023 · $5.5M · revenue +103%

Funded once

  • PI
    PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $571k · revenue -28%
  • MC
    MCKINSEY & COMPANY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $533k
  • CF
    CENTER FOR DISEASE DYNAMICS ECONOMICS & POLICY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $394k · revenue -31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A global nonprofit biomedical research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
2
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
3
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
4
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
5
International Vaccine Institute

To discover, develop and deliver safe, effective and affordable vaccines for global public health. its vision is developing countries free of suffering from infectious disease.

International
6
Center for Global Development

Reduce global poverty and improve lives through innovative economic research that drives better policy and practice by the world's top decision makers. we focus on the intersection of developing countries and the governments, institutions…

Human Services
7
Ibis Reproductive Health Inc

Ibis reproductive health drives change through bold, rigorous research and principled partnerships that advance sexual and reproductive autonomy, choices and health worldwide.

Health
8
Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc

For over 20 years, chai's mission has been to save lives and improve health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries around the world. we do this by enabling the government and private sector to strengthen and sustain quality health…

International
9
Institute for State Effectiveness

The institute for state effectiveness seeks to close the governance gap and advance inclusive growth so that states and markets deliver to citizens. ise advances practical approaches to strengthen capacity for transformation, through…

International
10
The California Medical Innovations Institute Inc

The Institute is a scientific research center dedicated to conducting basic and applied research to advance the understanding of human disease and the improvement of human health. The Institute fosters an innovative research environment…

Education
11
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
12
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Health International Inc; the most unlike its peers is William Marsh Rice University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/50
Grantees still filing
21/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Save The Children Federation Inc: $107,311,420 · InternationalSave The Children Federation IncPATH: $19,320,794 · InternationalPATHPACT INC: $15,236,661 · InternationalPACT INCMANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH INC: $9,530,933 · InternationalMANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH INCENGENDERHEALTH INC: $6,654,555 · International+11 more: $15,069,941 · International+11 moreJOHN SNOW INC: $65,861,174 · OtherJOHN SNOW INCPOPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL: $10,463,703 · OtherPOPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONALFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $3,839,024 · Other+42 more: $30,456,713 · Other+42 moreTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $33,434,641 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COL…THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $8,932,509 · EducationTHE HOWARD UNIVERSI…MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $5,516,862 · EducationMOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF…MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE: $5,193,536 · EducationMEHARRY MEDICAL COL…CHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE: $5,074,865 · EducationCHARLES R DREW UNIV…+5 more: $1,413,409 · EducationAVENIR HEALTH INC: $2,203,675 · HealthD-TREE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,134,790 · HealthCENTER FOR DISEASE DYNAMICS ECONOMICS & POLICY INC: $394,428 · HealthJACARANDA HEALTH: $317,698 · HealthACOG FOUNDATION: $174,171 · HealthINTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC: $170,625 · Health+3 more: $328,785 · HealthINSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT: $2,197,586 · Civil RightsTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $1,288,286 · Social ScienceCORE INC: $785,552 · Youth Development
International$173,124,304Other$110,620,614Education$59,565,822Health$4,724,172Civil Rights$2,197,586Social Science$1,288,286Youth Development$785,552

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $107,311,420 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $33,434,641 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPATH: $19,320,794 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetPACT INC: $15,236,661 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetPOPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL: $10,463,703 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetMANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH INC: $9,530,933 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $8,932,509 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetENGENDERHEALTH INC: $6,654,555 over 6y, 6.0% of budgetMOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $5,516,862 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetMEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE: $5,193,536 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE: $5,074,865 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetRESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC: $4,267,389 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $3,839,024 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $3,634,723 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFamily Health International Inc: $2,957,290 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAVENIR HEALTH INC: $2,203,675 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT: $2,197,586 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetCHRISTIAN CONNECTIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HEALTH: $2,132,012 over 5y, 65% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $1,288,286 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetD-TREE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,134,790 over 4y, 11% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $816,260 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCORE INC: $785,552 over 3y, 27% of budgetIMPACT INNOVATORS AND ENTREPRENEURS FOUNDATION: $736,303 over 4y, 72% of budgetResearch Triangle Institute: $721,534 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $570,898 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University: $420,799 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR DISEASE DYNAMICS ECONOMICS & POLICY INC: $394,428 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetGAPPS Global Alliance To Prevent Prematurity And Stillbirth: $375,000 over 2y, 42% of budgetJACARANDA HEALTH: $317,698 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF NURSE-MIDWIVES: $247,104 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetGRANT FOUNDATION INC: $236,018 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetST BONIFACE HAITI FOUNDATION INC: $223,951 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetINTERNEWS NETWORK: $176,637 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetACOG FOUNDATION: $174,171 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetINTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL INC: $170,625 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPATHFINDER INTERNATIONAL: $162,057 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNOORA HEALTH: $153,060 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH ON WOMEN: $150,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetEQUIMUNDO CENTER FOR MASCULINITIES AND SOCIAL JUS: $111,559 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL AIDS DIRECTORSDBA NASTAD: $110,573 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEmory University: $103,979 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Bar Association: $101,980 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION: $79,483 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetINTEALTH: $64,371 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUDERE: $39,869 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBALTIMORE CIVIC FUND INC: $10,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROTEUS FUND INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds PATH ↗
  • Who funds PACT INC ↗
  • Who funds POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds MANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ENGENDERHEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CHARLES R DREW UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds RESULTS FOR DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds Family Health International Inc ↗
  • Who funds AVENIR HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN CONNECTIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds D-TREE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds CORE INC ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT INNOVATORS AND ENTREPRENEURS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Research Triangle Institute ↗
  • Who funds PLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Johns Hopkins Univers…Gates FoundationJsi Research & Traini…Family Health Interna…Population Services I…The Rockefeller Found…Clinton Health Access…PathConrad N Hilton Found…Wellspring Philanthro…Gavi AllianceGlobal Communities
Johns Hopkins UniversityMD47.4× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Johns Hopkins University · Gates Foundation · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · Family Health International Inc · Population Services International · The Rockefeller Foundation · Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc · Path · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Gavi Alliance · Global Communities

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jhpiego Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jhpiego Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Management Sciences for Health Inc: 67% of income from government
  • Danya Institute Inc: 54% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Center for Disease Dynamics Economics & Policy Inc: 16% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Project Medishare for Haiti Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Institute for Healthcare Improvement: 0% of income from government
  • Avenir Health Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jhpiego’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home