Skip to content
Jefferson Regional Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Jefferson Regional Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to improve the health and well-being of the communities served by jefferson hospital through engagement, community-driven research and grantmaking.

$3.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
55
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$4.7MHealth$4.1MYouth Development$3.2MEducation$2.5MEmployment$2.2MCommunity Improvement$1.8MArts & Culture$1.2MEnvironment$870kOther$0
02FY2025 · 55 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k20 grants · $503k
  • $50k–250k35 grants · $3.0M
$60,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$133M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH$200,000
ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK$140,000
SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA PARTNERSHIP FOR AGING$125,000
DRESS FOR SUCCESS PITTSBURGH$125,000
WOMEN FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT$125,000
THE MON VALLEY INITIATIVE$125,000
LATINO COMMUNITY CENTER$115,000
STOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS DBA THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP$100,000
ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK$100,000
BHUTANESE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURGH$100,000
LITERACY PITTSBURGH$100,000
CASA SAN JOSE$100,000
SOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK$80,000
GLOBAL LINKS$80,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA PARTNERSHIP FOR AGING: $200k → 9%BEVERLY'S BIRTHDAYS: $50k → 10%CASA SAN JOSE: $100k → 11%NURTURE PA INC: $60k → 12%YOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY: $42k → 11%YOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY: $64k → 12%SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA PARTNERSHIP FOR AGING: $125k → 9%BEVERLY'S BIRTHDAYS: $50k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH: $200k → 11%NURTUREPA INC: $50k → 12%SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA PARTNERSHIP FOR AGING: $125k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES: $120k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES: $80k → 11%Jewish Family & Children's Service of Pittsburgh: $35k → 11%FOOTBRIDGE FOR FAMILIES INC: $140k → 11%FOOTBRIDGE FOR FAMILIES INC: $125k → 11%Vintage: $99k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA WOMEN WORK: $45k → 11%MAPLE UNIFIED STUDENT ACADEMY INC: $80k → 11%RAINBOW KITCHEN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $60k → 11%Methodist Union of Social Agencies Inc: $50k → 11%METHODIST UNION OF SOCIAL AGENCIES (MUSA): $40k → 11%THE BLESSING BOARD: $180k → 11%THE BLESSING BOARD: $65k → 11%PRESBYTERIAN SENIORCARE: $50k → 11%THE BLESSING BOARD: $35k → 11%FOOTBRIDGE FOR FAMILIES INC: $100k → 11%FOOTBRIDGE FOR FAMILIES INC: $60k → 11%CHRISTIAN IMMIGRATION ADVOCACY CENTER: $75k → 11%FOUNDATION OF HOPE: $75k → 11%CHRISTIAN IMMIGRATION ADVOCACY CENTER: $50k → 11%LATINO COMMUNITY CENTER: $195k → 11%LATINO COMMUNITY CENTER: $115k → 11%LATINO COMMUNITY CENTER: $100k → 11%COMMUNITY HUMAN SERVICES CORPORATION: $50k → 11%SPENCER FAMILY YMCA: $110k → 11%THE BLESSING BOARD: $75k → 11%CITIZENS SCIENCE LAB: $45k → 11%THE BLESSING BOARD: $75k → 11%CENTER OF LIFE: $90k → 11%THE BLESSING BOARD: $75k → 11%AUBERLE: $50k → 11%WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA DIAPER BANK: $80k → 11%FOOTBRIDGE FOR FAMILIES INC: $60k → 11%HUMAN SERVICES CENTER CORPORATION: $75k → 11%HUMAN SERVICES CENTER CORPORATION: $75k → 11%EASTERN AREA ADULT SERVICES INC: $50k → 11%MELANIN MOMMIES INC: $40k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of Jefferson Regional Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 91% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 80%.

Jefferson Regional Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19M · 76 repeat orgs$5.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

76 repeat relationships: 34 still active in FY2025, 42 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

76
83

Total granted

$19M
$4.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+4%

Still filing today

88%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $817k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES
    5× · 2017–2025 · $790k · revenue +105%
  • MP
    MELTING POT MINISTRIES
    6× · 2017–2024 · $725k · revenue +224% · 47% of their budget
  • LP
    LITERACY PITTSBURGH
    7× · 2018–2025 · $677k · revenue +153%

Funded once

  • CL
    Carnegie Library of Homestead
    one grant, 2020 · $260k · revenue +13%
  • PC
    Primary Care Health Services Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $225k · revenue +3%
  • TB
    THE BLESSING BOARD
    one grant, 2022 · $200k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pittsburgh Community Broadcasting Corporation

To create and distribute trusted content, build connections and strengthen our community through public media.

Arts & Culture
2
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
3
Sustainable Pittsburgh

Provide information to decision maker in the pittsburgh region to promote economic prosperity, social equity, and environmental quality for sustainable solutions for communities and businesses.

Environment
4
Catapult Greater Pittsburgh

Catapult engages in connecting families to emergency resources, peer to peer support, wealth building, trauma informed financial counseling & policy advocacy to ensure that communities can meaningfully achieve economic justice & lead…

Community Improvement
5
Pittsburgh Community Services Inc

Provide programs to help individuals and/or families achieve self-sufficiency.

Human Services
6
Pittsburgh Council On Higher Education

To provide a means for sharing resources and information among members, engage in joint projects, and offer a common voice on educational matters.

Education
7
The Regional Opportunity Center D/B/a Vibrant Pittsburgh

Vibrant pittsburgh's mission is to accelerate the business community toward equitable, inclusive, and diverse workplaces, creating a future-forward region.

Arts & Culture
8
Pittsburgh Business Group On Health

An employer-led coalition that champions outcomes-based, cost-effective healthcare through education, market expertise, group purchasing, comparative data and decision support.

—
9
Young Women's Christian Association Greater Pittsburgh

Ywca greater pittsburgh is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all. we envision a community that advances education, opportunity, and equity regardless of gender, race, or…

Human Services
10
Pittsburgh Works Together Inc

Educate and advocate on behalf of the construction, energy, and manufacturing industries and the resulting economic and job growth in pennsylvania.

Community Improvement
11
Regional Workforce Collaborative - Swpa

To provide policy guidance, technical assistance, and program oversight for the city of pittsburgh and allegheny county, and to assist in the economic development of southwestern pa region.

Community Improvement
12
Pittsburgh United

Pittsburgh United, Inc. strives to advance social & economic justice in the

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Victims; the most unlike its peers is Anna Middleton Waite Learning Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

130 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 130 of the 180 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

14
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
40
Early backer (in before they grew)
126/130
Grantees still filing
78/130
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HIGHMARK HEALTH: $1,935,200 · OtherHIGHMARK HEALTHBRENTWOOD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP DBA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH INC: $724,000 · OtherBRENTWOOD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP DBA ECONOMIC DEVELO…SOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES: $790,000 · OtherSOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES+104 more: $8,762,000 · Other+104 moreTHE BLESSING BOARD: $505,000 · Human ServicesTHE BLESSING BOARDFootbridge for Families Inc: $485,000 · Human ServicesFootbridge for Fami…JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH: $473,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY AND C…SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA PARTNERSHIP FOR AGING: $450,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHWESTERN PENNSY…THE LATINO COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $438,000 · Human ServicesTHE LATINO COMMUNIT…BEVERLY'S PGH: $175,000 · Human ServicesMaple Unified Student Academy Inc: $170,000 · Human ServicesHUMAN SERVICES CENTER CORPORATION: $150,000 · Human Services+24 more: $1,534,500 · Human Services+24 moreLITERACY PITTSBURGH: $677,000 · EducationLITERACY PI…Allegheny County Library Association: $320,000 · EducationAllegheny C…DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $295,000 · EducationDUQUESNE UN…STOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS D/B/A THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP: $270,000 · EducationSTOREHOUSE …UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $234,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $200,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY C…CASH FOR KIDS: $165,000 · EducationCASH FOR KI…Anna Middleton Waite Learning Center: $140,000 · EducationAnna Middle…STEM CODING LAB INC: $140,000 · EducationSTEM CODING…+2 more: $100,000 · EducationMELTING POT MINISTRIES: $725,000 · PhilanthropyTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $480,000 · PhilanthropyBest of the Batch Foundation: $345,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $35,000 · PhilanthropyBHUTANESE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURGH: $633,000 · Arts & CultureVETERANS BREAKFAST CLUB: $368,000 · Arts & CultureATTACK THEATRE INC: $120,000 · Arts & CultureWQED MULTIMEDIA: $120,000 · Arts & CulturePUBLICSOURCE: $100,000 · Arts & CultureFILIPINO AMERICAN ASSOC OF PGH: $81,000 · Arts & CultureSALTWORKS THEATRE COMPANY: $75,000 · Arts & Culture1HOOD MEDIA ACADEMY INC: $75,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $13,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DRAGON'S DEN: $475,000 · Youth DevelopmentGwens Girls Inc: $307,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH OPPORTUNITIES DEVELOPMENT: $127,000 · Youth DevelopmentReading Ready Pittsburgh: $110,000 · Youth DevelopmentLAROSA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTHPLACES: $50,000 · Youth Development+4 more: $102,000 · Youth DevelopmentMON VALLEY INITIATIVE: $905,000 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOOD RESILIENCE PROJECT: $150,000 · Community ImprovementMCKEES POINT DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC: $75,000 · Community ImprovementMACEDONIA FAMILY AND COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $60,000 · Community Improvement
Other$12,211,200Human Services$4,380,500Education$2,541,000Philanthropy$1,685,000Arts & Culture$1,585,000Youth Development$1,371,000Community Improvement$1,190,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMON VALLEY INITIATIVE: $905,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetSOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES: $790,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetMELTING POT MINISTRIES: $725,000 over 6y, 47% of budgetBRENTWOOD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP DBA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SOUTH INC: $724,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetLITERACY PITTSBURGH: $677,000 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetBHUTANESE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF PITTSBURGH: $633,000 over 8y, 38% of budgetTHE BLESSING BOARD: $505,000 over 5y, 23% of budgetFootbridge for Families Inc: $485,000 over 5y, 23% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $480,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE DRAGON'S DEN: $475,000 over 4y, 34% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF PITTSBURGH: $473,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA PARTNERSHIP FOR AGING: $450,000 over 3y, 58% of budgetTHE LATINO COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $438,000 over 4y, 9.3% of budgetVENTURE OUTDOORS INC: $390,000 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetVETERANS BREAKFAST CLUB: $368,000 over 7y, 32% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $363,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS PITTSBURGH: $351,500 over 5y, 8.9% of budgetBest of the Batch Foundation: $345,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetAllegheny County Library Association: $320,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetWOMEN FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT: $310,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetGwens Girls Inc: $307,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT: $295,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTOREHOUSE FOR TEACHERS D/B/A THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP: $270,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCarnegie Library of Homestead: $260,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetGLOBAL LINKS: $240,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $234,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPrimary Care Health Services Inc: $225,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSISTERS PLACE INC: $208,500 over 2y, 11% of budgetCENTER FOR HEARING & DEAF SERVICES INC: $201,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetGLOBAL SOLUTIONS PITTSBURGH: $200,000 over 3y, 50% of budgetCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTRYING TOGETHER: $178,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetBEVERLY'S PGH: $175,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetMaple Unified Student Academy Inc: $170,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetCASH FOR KIDS: $165,000 over 2y, 86% of budgetTHE MISSION CONTINUES: $150,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHUMAN SERVICES CENTER CORPORATION: $150,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetTHE FORBES FUNDS: $150,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD RESILIENCE PROJECT: $150,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetAnna Middleton Waite Learning Center: $140,000 over 4y, 83% of budgetSTEM CODING LAB INC: $140,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetVISION TO LEARN: $135,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $135,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFIRST STEP RECOVERY HOMES INC: $130,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetYOUTH OPPORTUNITIES DEVELOPMENT: $127,000 over 4y, 41% of budgetCHRISTIAN IMMIGRATION ADVOCACY CENT: $125,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetATTACK THEATRE INC: $120,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetWQED MULTIMEDIA: $120,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh Founda…Hillman Family Founda…The Heinz EndowmentsThe Grable FoundationRichard King Mellon F…The United Way of Sou…Staunton Farm Foundat…The Buhl FoundationEden Hall FoundationUpmc GroupFisa FoundationMcElhattan Foundation
The Pittsburgh FoundationPA129.1× affinity100 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Heinz Endowments · The Grable Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation · The Buhl Foundation · Eden Hall Foundation · Upmc Group · Fisa Foundation · McElhattan Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jefferson Regional Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jefferson Regional Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Side Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
57report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 180 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Jefferson Regional’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home