· Private foundation
Janice Seagraves Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k54 grants · $214k
- $10k–50k22 grants · $377k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $425k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DONOR ADVISORY FUND | $250,000 |
| PEOPLE FOR PETS | $126,500 |
| FIGHTERS CHANCE | $120,000 |
| OPTIMIST YOUTH HOUSE | $75,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $53,500 |
| COLLEGE OF IDAHO | $50,000 |
| BURLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $30,584 |
| VOICES AGAINST VIOLENCE | $25,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB | $25,000 |
| CITY OF TWIN FALLS | $23,960 |
| MAGIC VALLEY PUBLIC SAFETY GRANT COMMISSION | $22,400 |
| COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE PANTRY | $21,000 |
| FILER SENIOR HAVEN | $20,000 |
| CAMP RAINBOW GOLD | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $197k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
100 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2025, 65 since wound down; 47 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $633k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCThe College of Idaho Inc5× · 2017–2025 · $212k · revenue +66%
- IVINTERLINK VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS INC6× · 2017–2024 · $130k · revenue +2%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MAGIC VALLEY4× · 2017–2020 · $105k · revenue +167%
Funded once
- CSCHARLES SCHWAB DONOR ADVISED FUNDone grant, 2024 · $401k
- OFOptimists Foundationone grant, 2018 · $120k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $116k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide Nutritious meals to citizens of East Boise County Most of our recipients are elderly or disabled
Providing meals and activities for senior citizens
Idaho Animal Rescue Network is a 501(c)(3) non-profit based in Idaho that works in Idaho and Eastern Washington to educate, advocate, and network with other rescues and law enforcement in Idaho regarding animal cruelty and neglect. We are…
We serve the senior citizens of Southern Bingham County, and the Citizens of Aberdeen, Idaho Meals on Wheels and congregate meals onsite.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Council of Idaho Inc and the most unlike its peers is Always Christmas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 315 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FIGHTERS CHANCE ↗
- Who funds The College of Idaho Inc ↗
- Who funds INTERLINK VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MAGIC VALLEY ↗
- Who funds MAGIC VALLEY PUBLIC SAFETY GRANT COMMISSION INC ↗
- Who funds RACING FOR CHARITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE TOOTH FAIRY INC ↗
- Who funds Twin Falls County Fair & Rodeo Foundatio ↗
- Who funds THE CRISIS HOTLINE INC ↗
- Who funds BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA'S CAUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Filer Senior Haven Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: First Federal Foundation Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Racing for Charity Inc · Twin Falls County Health Initiatives Trustltd · Magic Valley Festival of Giving Inc · Whitten-Welch Foundation Kelly Smith · Idaho Power Foundation Inc · St Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Janice Seagraves Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.