· Private foundation
Idaho Power Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k92 grants · $277k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $303k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE SALVATION ARMY BOISE CORPS | $100,000 |
| WASHINGTON COUNTY FAIR EDUCATIONAL FUND | $40,000 |
| CALDWELL WESTERN HERITAGE FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| TREASURE VALLEY FAMILY YMCA | $20,000 |
| COLLEGE OF WESTERN IDAHO FOUNDATION INC | $20,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO FOUNDATION INC | $20,000 |
| BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC | $20,000 |
| IDAHO GOVERNORS CUP SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC | $20,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO FOUNDATION INC | $20,000 |
| BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC | $20,000 |
| FRIENDS OF IDAHO PUBLIC TELEVISION INC | $20,000 |
| BALLET IDAHO INC | $15,000 |
| LOG CABIN FOR LITERACY CENTER INC | $12,500 |
| IDAHO BOTANICAL GARDEN INC | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +7% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
58 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 59 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $403k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BSBoise State University Foundation Inc4× · 2021–2025 · $84k · revenue +182%
- IGIDAHO GOVERNORS CUP SCHOLARSHIP FUND IN4× · 2022–2025 · $77k · revenue +100%
- UOUniversity of Idaho Foundation Inc2× · 2021–2025 · $57k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF IDAHOone grant, 2019 · $30k
- COCOLLEGE OF EASTERN IDAHO FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -21%
- ISIDAHO STEM ACTION CENTER FOUNDATION INCORPORATEDone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -89%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To help technology companies in Idaho start, grow, and thrive.
The Idaho Wildlife Federation (IWF) promotes the conservation of Idaho's wildlife heritage and legacy of sporting opportunities for the current and future generations.
Icl's mission is to create a conservation community and pragmatic, enduring solutions that protect and restore the air you breathe, the water you drink, and the land and wildlife you love.
To preserve and protect, for public benefit, open space lands and unique natural, scenic settings throughout the state of idaho utilizing various flexible conservation methods.
IHDE exists to create and maintain a collaborative statewide effort to improve the coordination and quality of healthcare through the use of a health information exchange and health information technology.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Idaho Nonprofit Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Fair Baker City. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
128 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 128 of the 232 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Boise State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds IDAHO GOVERNORS CUP SCHOLARSHIP FUND IN ↗
- Who funds Idaho Housing Foundation ↗
- Who funds University of Idaho Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA CO ID ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOISE CITY IDAHO ↗
- Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Inc ↗
- Who funds IDAHO BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds CALDWELL WESTERN HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORWORKS BOISE ↗
- Who funds College of Western Idaho Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE OF EASTERN IDAHO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO STEM ACTION CENTER FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE PEREGRINE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of Idaho Public Television Inc ↗
- Who funds Women's and Children's Alliance ↗
- Who funds BALLET IDAHO INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Museum of Idaho Inc ↗
- Who funds WASSMUTH CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS HOME OF THE ANNE FRANK MEMORIAL ↗
- Who funds CANYON COUNTY FESTIVAL OF TREES INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds GIRAFFE LAUGH INC ↗
- Who funds THE DISCOVERY CENTER OF IDAHO INC ↗
- Who funds MAGIC VALLEY ARTS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds IDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds The College of Idaho Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Claude R & Ethel B Whittenberger Foundation · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · The Julius C Jeker Foundation Inc · Harad Family Foundation · Langan Barber Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Idaho Power Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Four Rivers Community School Inc — 20% of income from government
- The Freshwater Trust — 17% of income from government
- Nixyawii Community School — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Idaho Power Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Idaho Power Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.