Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

St Luke's Health System Ltd

To improve the health of people in the communities we serve.

$8.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
125
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$3.4M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$25MHuman Services$4.0MRecreation & Sports$3.4MEducation$3.0MHousing & Shelter$1.8MPublic Benefit$1.3MYouth Development$1.0MFood & Nutrition$945kOther$0
02FY2024 · 125 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 125 grants below total $7,941,243 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $8,312,856 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $371,613 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k34 grants · $242k
  • $10k–50k62 grants · $1.0M
  • $50k–250k27 grants · $2.3M
  • $250k+2 grants · $4.3M
$13,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.7B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Full Circle Health$3,407,612
University Of Washington$934,821
Ronald Mcdonald House Idaho$210,500
City Of Boise$198,650
Idaho Botanical Garden Inc$164,500
Boise State University Foundation$160,900
Family Health Services$134,861
Valley Regional Transit$116,000
Idaho Youth Ranch Inc$105,000
University Of Idaho Foundation$100,000
Idaho Coalition For Safe Healthcare Foundation$100,000
Bogus Basin Mountain Resorts$96,000
Twin Falls School District 411$92,361
Boys And Girls Club Of Magic Valley$63,900
Idaho Hispanic Foundation$62,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Rise Up 2 Thrive Inc: $15k → 8%Idaho Hispanic Foundation: $62k → 11%Jerome County Senior Citizens: $20k → 12%Janus Industries Llc: $20k → 15%Idaho Youth Ranch Inc: $110k → 8%Idaho Youth Ranch Inc: $105k → 8%American National Red Cross: $50k → 14%American National Red Cross: $50k → 14%American National Red Cross: $15k → 14%Idaho Youth Ranch Inc: $53k → 8%Mountain Home Senior Center: $20k → 11%Mountain Home Senior Center: $20k → 11%Ignite Idaho Family Resource Center: $18k → 8%Mountain Home Senior Center: $15k → 11%Family Justice Center: $23k → 11%Family Justice Center: $20k → 11%Twin Falls Senior Citizens Fed: $35k → 11%Everybody House: $23k → 11%Voices Against Violence: $20k → 11%Everybody House: $20k → 11%Voices Against Violence: $15k → 11%Idaho Hunger Relief Task Force: $69k → 8%Living Independence Network: $25k → 8%Living Independence Network: $23k → 8%Idaho Hunger Relief Task Force: $20k → 8%Living Independence Network: $18k → 8%Giraffe Laugh Early Learning: $42k → 8%Jannus Inc: $126k → 8%Jannus Inc: $70k → 8%Jannus Inc: $66k → 8%Jannus Inc: $60k → 8%Jannus Inc: $56k → 8%Jannus Inc: $55k → 8%Womens And Childrens Alliance: $50k → 8%Faces: $48k → 8%Faces Of Hope Foundation: $45k → 8%Faces of Hope Foundation: $38k → 8%Faces Of Hope Foundation: $36k → 8%Faces of Hope Foundation: $34k → 8%Faces Of Hope Foundation: $31k → 8%Women's And Children's Alliance: $26k → 8%Womens And Childrens Alliance: $25k → 8%Jannus Inc: $22k → 8%Women's And Children's Alliance: $21k → 8%Jesse Tree Of Idaho: $20k → 8%Jesse Tree Of Idaho: $20k → 8%Women's & Children's Alliance: $16k → 8%Charitable Assistance to Communitys Homeless Inc: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
NY
OR
IA
CA
UT
VA
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of St Luke's Health System Ltd’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 85% of the giving stays in ID; read by stated purpose it is 88% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

St Luke's Health System Ltdlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$42M · 149 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

149 repeat relationships — 96 still active in FY2024, 53 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

149
60

Total granted

$42M
$863k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+7%

Still filing today

75%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $613k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FULL CIRCLE HEALTH INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $19M · revenue +157%
  • TY
    THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOISE CITY IDAHO
    6× · 2017–2022 · $1.7M · revenue +71%
  • UO
    University of Idaho Foundation Inc
    5× · 2019–2024 · $670k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • IF
    IDAHOANS FOR A PROPEROUS WORKFORCE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue -88%
  • IM
    IDAHO MEDICAL ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -2%
  • BP
    Boise Professional Baseball
    one grant, 2021 · $35k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
2
Indigenous Idaho Alliance Inc
Civil Rights
3
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
4
Idaho Operation Lifesaver
—
5
Brave Hearts Idaho
Arts & Culture
6
Idaho Health Care Association Inc

The idaho health care association, inc. is a member driven association whose mission is to provide the unified voice for the betterment of the idaho nursing home and assisted living care professionals and the residents they serve.

—
7
Idaho Medical Association Foundation Inc
Health
8
Idaho Legal Aid Services Inc Idaho Legal Aid Services Inc

Idaho legal aid services inc is a statewide nonprofit law firm dedicated to providing equal access for low-income people through quality advocacy and education

Crime & Legal
9
Idaho Health Data Exchange Inc

IHDE exists to create and maintain a collaborative statewide effort to improve the coordination and quality of healthcare through the use of a health information exchange and health information technology.

Health
10
Underdogs Boise
Arts & Culture
11
Building Hope Idaho Inc
Philanthropy
12
Idaho Elks Rehab Hospital Inc
Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Treasure Valley Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nampa Schools Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%4%<5yr17%11%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr14%24%20–35yr10%21%35–55yr14%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr17%1%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr14%68%20–35yr10%12%35–55yr14%14%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%4/239
the rest of the field
16%
632/3,950

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

174 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 174 of the 239 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
51
Early backer (in before they grew)
172/174
Grantees still filing
119/174
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FULL CIRCLE HEALTH INC — $18,835,485 · HealthFULL CIRCLE HEALTH INC+18 more — $2,306,803 · Health+18 moreUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $5,559,640 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOISE CITY IDAHO — $1,687,492 · OtherTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF …CITY OF BOISE — $1,557,540 · OtherCITY OF BOISE+118 more — $6,722,029 · Other+118 moreJANNUS INC — $483,915 · Human ServicesIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC — $287,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $265,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER & EDUCATION SERVI DBA FACES OF HOPE — $240,000 · Human ServicesWomen's and Children's Alliance — $158,000 · Human ServicesIDAHO HUNGER RELIEF TASK FORCE INC — $129,223 · Human Services+25 more — $1,089,225 · Human ServicesUniversity of Idaho Foundation Inc — $670,000 · EducationBoise State University Foundation Inc — $423,435 · EducationDAVID A HINDSON MD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $320,453 · EducationBOISE PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $172,500 · Education+7 more — $310,866 · EducationBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MAGIC VALLEY — $192,950 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP RAINBOW GOLD INC — $134,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA CO ID — $123,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CANYON COUNTY INC — $121,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WESTERN TREASURE VALLEY — $78,500 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF SILVER SAGE COUNCIL INC — $56,750 · Youth DevelopmentNATIONAL INTERSCHOLASTIC CYCLING ASSOCIATION — $35,000 · Youth Development+4 more — $57,950 · Youth DevelopmentIdaho Housing Foundation — $622,000 · Housing & ShelterINTERFAITH SANCTUARY HOUSING SERVICES INC — $70,000 · Housing & Shelter+2 more — $27,000 · Housing & ShelterIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE — $535,340 · Food & NutritionTreasure Valley Food Coalition — $62,000 · Food & NutritionElderly Opportunity Agency Inc — $50,000 · Food & Nutrition
Health$21,142,288Other$15,526,701Human Services$2,652,863Education$1,897,254Youth Development$800,150Housing & Shelter$719,000Food & Nutrition$647,340

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFULL CIRCLE HEALTH INC — $18,835,485 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOISE CITY IDAHO — $1,687,492 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetUniversity of Idaho Foundation Inc — $670,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetIdaho Housing Foundation — $622,000 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Inc — $586,500 over 8y, 7.0% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE — $535,340 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetJANNUS INC — $483,915 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS INC — $425,315 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetBoise State University Foundation Inc — $423,435 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetDAVID A HINDSON MD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $320,453 over 6y, 5.4% of budgetBOGUS BASIN RECREATIONAL ASSOCIATION INC — $314,333 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetIDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC — $287,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFamily Health Services Corporation — $265,436 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $265,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLEAP CHARITIES INC — $255,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetFAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER & EDUCATION SERVI DBA FACES OF HOPE — $240,000 over 7y, 8.7% of budgetBOISE METRO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC — $226,734 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetSELECTHEALTH INC — $211,570 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWASSMUTH CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS HOME OF THE ANNE FRANK MEMORIAL — $201,000 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetAMERICA'S ESSENTIAL HOSPITALS — $195,375 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MAGIC VALLEY — $192,950 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetBOISE PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $172,500 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY INC — $170,250 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetHARMON KILLEBREW-DANNY THOMPSON MEMORIAL CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $168,758 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetIDAHO BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $164,500 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetWomen's and Children's Alliance — $158,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetIDAHOANS FOR A PROPEROUS WORKFORCE INC — $150,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetGENESIS COMMUNITY HEALTH — $136,500 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF IDAHO INC — $135,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetCAMP RAINBOW GOLD INC — $134,500 over 5y, 32% of budgetIDAHO HUNGER RELIEF TASK FORCE INC — $129,223 over 6y, 30% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $127,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA CO ID — $123,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CANYON COUNTY INC — $121,000 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 61 EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $120,050 over 3y, 11% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SW ID INC — $116,450 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetIDAHO COALITION FOR SAFE HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 68% of budgetThe Momentum Group Create Common Good — $98,419 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetFAMILY ADVOCATE PROGRAM INC — $97,854 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetINTERLINK VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS INC — $91,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetIDAHO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC — $81,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetBISHOP KELLY FOUNDATION INC — $81,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetBOISE BICYCLE PROJECT INC — $80,500 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WESTERN TREASURE VALLEY — $78,500 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetMountain Home Senior Center Inc — $75,000 over 5y, 8.1% of budgetLIVING INDEPENDENCE NETWORK COPORATION — $75,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE REACH INSTITUTE RESOURCE FOR ADVANCING CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $70,400 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetINTERFAITH SANCTUARY HOUSING SERVICES INC — $70,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FULL CIRCLE HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOISE CITY IDAHO ↗
  • Who funds University of Idaho Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Idaho Housing Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Inc ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds JANNUS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS INC ↗
  • Who funds Boise State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds DAVID A HINDSON MD EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOGUS BASIN RECREATIONAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Family Health Services Corporation ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds LEAP CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER & EDUCATION SERVI DBA FACES OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds BOISE METRO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC ↗
  • Who funds SELECTHEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds WASSMUTH CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS HOME OF THE ANNE FRANK MEMORIAL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA'S ESSENTIAL HOSPITALS ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MAGIC VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds BOISE PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF TREASURE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds HARMON KILLEBREW-DANNY THOMPSON MEMORIAL CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Women's and Children's Alliance ↗
  • Who funds IDAHOANS FOR A PROPEROUS WORKFORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds GENESIS COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF IDAHO INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP RAINBOW GOLD INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO HUNGER RELIEF TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA CO ID ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Idaho Community Found…Laura Moore Cunningha…Blue Cross of Idaho F…Idaho Power Foundatio…Simplot Company Found…United Way of Treasur…Claude R & Ethel B Wh…Lamb Weston Charitabl…Saint Alphonsus Regio…The Julius C Jeker Fo…St Luke's Magic Valle…Idaho Womens Charitab…
Idaho Community Foundation IncID145.6× affinity97 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · Idaho Power Foundation Inc · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · United Way of Treasure Valley Inc · Claude R & Ethel B Whittenberger Foundation · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Inc · The Julius C Jeker Foundation Inc · St Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd · Idaho Womens Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization St Luke's Health System Ltd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    49report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 239 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home