How much did RACING FOR CHARITY INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of RACING FOR CHARITY INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$17k

Total assets

Largest grants

SANTA'S CAUSE INC$10,000
INTERLINK VOLUNTEERS$10,000
WEST END SENIOR CENTER$10,000
BURLEY SENIOR CENTER$10,000
BLANKET BLESSINGS INC$10,000
JEROME SENIOR CITIZEN SVC CTR INC$10,000
MV SUICIDE AWARENSS & PREVENTION$10,000
TWIN FALLS OPTIMIST YOUTH HOUSE$10,000
MV AREA HUMANITARIAN CENTER$10,000
TF COUNTY FAIR & RODEO FOUNDATION$10,000
BENEVOLENCE & BEYOND INC$10,000
MAGIC VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HALL$10,000
SIMPLY HOPE FAMILY OUTRECH$10,000
IDAHO LEGAL AID SERVICES IN$10,000
WELLNESS TREE COMMUNITY CLINIC$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$613k · 20 repeat orgs$178k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against -43% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$613k

$148k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%

-43%

Still filing today

40%

43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

WT
WELLNESS TREE COMMUNITY CLINIC
4× · 2021–2024 · $42k · revenue +57%
SW
SAGE WOMEN'S CENTER
3× · 2021–2023 · $32k · revenue +167%
MV
MAGIC VALLEY ARTS COUNCIL
3× · 2021–2023 · $32k · revenue +11%

Funded once

BK
BECAUSE KIDS GRIEVE INCgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue +51%
WC
WALKER CENTER
one grant, 2022 · $12k
TF
TWIN FALLS LIONS CHARITABLE FUND
one grant, 2022 · $12k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Magic Valley Youth Services Inc

Magic Valley Youth Services INC's mission is to provide services to youth and adults to enhance the basic educational skills of participants, to encourage school completion or enrollment in supplementary or alternative school programs, and…

Employment

Northern Nevada Moses Project

Northern Nevada Moses Project provides clothing, food, beds, bedding, toiletries, school supplies, and necessities to foster children, guardianship children, foster families, homeless teens and families in crisis. Donations are collected…

Human Services

Mustard Seed Missions of Venango County

to provide resources to families and children in order that they may live together in safe and sanitary conditions

Religion

Valley Mission Inc

Valley Mission operates a Food Pantry. Soon to include case management, overnight emergency shelter, counseling, career training, spiritual development, life skills training, office space for partnering agencies, Valley Mission offices and…

Human Services

Kelly Childrens Home Inc

KCH offers a vital refuge and support system for youths and families experiencing crises such as homelessness abuse or neglect. Our mission extends to providing a nurturing residential environment for young adults transitioning out of…

Human Services

Promise Ridge Inc

To provide emergency, temporary, and transitional housing for homeless families in the city of idaho falls

Human Services

Wallace Christmas Fund

To assist needy families in the Wallace Idaho area

Community Improvement

Haven Foster Shoppe

Help foster youth and families free of charge

Human Services

Magic Valley Area Humanitarian Center

To promote unity in the community, reduce suffering, seek out and help those in need, support community groups and agencies with similar purposes, foster self-reliance, prepare for individual, family, and community emergencies, provide…

Human Services

Mission Central Inc

Mission Central aims to provide living and medical necessities for children and adults, purchasing items to fill in the gaps that donations can't provide. Children and their families have access to, on average, five 3-hour periods a month,…

Human Services

Hope Ministries of the Valley Inc

Religious organization offering assitance to members of the local community

Religion

Life House Ministries

Through education and empowerment, Life House Ministries equips single moms to raise healthy children, overcome financial hardship and heal from past trauma. Services are offered to single parents affected by homelessness, domestic…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Visions Charities Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blanket Blessings Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

14/15

Grantees still filing

8/15

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$531,000Health$83,000Human Services$51,500Philanthropy$41,500Arts & Culture$31,500Recreation & Sports$31,500Housing & Shelter$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Federal Foundation IncID22.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Federal Foundation Inc · Janice Seagraves Family Foundation Inc · Magic Valley Festival of Giving Inc · Twin Falls County Health · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · St Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation RACING FOR CHARITY INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BECAUSE KIDS GRIEVE INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +51% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 820525955 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on BECAUSE KIDS GRIEVE INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 19% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Racing for Charity Inc?

Find your warmest path to Racing for Charity Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

RACING FOR CHARITY INC

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Racing for Charity Inc?

More from the funding graph

RACING FOR CHARITY INC

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Racing for Charity Inc?

More from the funding graph