· Private foundation
Racing for Charity Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BLANKET BLESSINGS INC | $10,000 |
| BENEVOLENCE & BEYOND INC | $10,000 |
| JEROME SENIOR CITIZEN SVC CTR INC | $10,000 |
| BURLEY SENIOR CENTER | $10,000 |
| MV SUICIDE AWARENSS & PREVENTION | $10,000 |
| TWIN FALLS OPTIMIST YOUTH HOUSE | $10,000 |
| SIMPLY HOPE FAMILY OUTRECH | $10,000 |
| MV AREA HUMANITARIAN CENTER | $10,000 |
| WEST END SENIOR CENTER | $10,000 |
| IDAHO LEGAL AID SERVICES IN | $10,000 |
| MAGIC VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HALL | $10,000 |
| SANTA'S CAUSE INC | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| TF COUNTY FAIR & RODEO FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| WELLNESS TREE COMMUNITY CLINIC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against -12% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MVMAGIC VALLEY ARTS COUNCIL3× · 2021–2023 · $32k · revenue +33%
- SWSAGE WOMEN'S CENTER INC3× · 2021–2023 · $32k · revenue +49%
- PFPEOPLE FOR PETS MAGIC VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY3× · 2021–2023 · $32k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- MPMV PEDIATRIC CANCER COALITIONone grant, 2022 · $12k
- MJMV JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue -31%
- TFTWIN FALLS LIONS CHARITABLE FUND INCone grant, 2022 · $12k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Magic Valley Youth Services INC's mission is to provide services to youth and adults to enhance the basic educational skills of participants, to encourage school completion or enrollment in supplementary or alternative school programs, and…
To promote unity in the community, reduce suffering, seek out and help those in need, support community groups and agencies with similar purposes, foster self-reliance, prepare for individual, family, and community emergencies, provide…
Valley Mission currently operates a Food Pantry. New services offered in the new facility will inlcude an 18-bed emergency shelter, commercial kitchen/dining area, office space, medical clinic, 16-bed transformational living program (6…
To distribute food, clothing, and toys to the low income and under privileged in the tri-county area.
The everybody house mission is to meet the unmet needs of communities in twin falls by creating an equitable community space where everyone can feel like they belong, and their needs matter. we do this by working to address food and…
Primary purpose is to supply turkeys at thanksgiving to those that cannot afford a turkey
Provide support to ACVSC
rescue abused neglected equines of all types of condition we provide all care and a final home for them to live out remainder of days as opposed to going to slaughter
The Center's primary mission is to make foster children in Yuma County more comfortable, cared for, and feeling loved. We accomplish this by providing clothing items, comfort items including stuffed animals, teddy bears, handmade quilts…
To provide assistance in emergency situations.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Visions Charities Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blanket Blessings Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WELLNESS TREE COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds SANTA'S CAUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Twin Falls County Fair & Rodeo Foundatio ↗
- Who funds MAGIC VALLEY ARTS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds JuMP Company Inc ↗
- Who funds SAGE WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE FOR PETS MAGIC VALLEY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds QRU Nonprofit Organization ↗
- Who funds SIMPLY HOPE FAMILY OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds TWIN FALLS OPTIMIST YOUTH HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds MUSTARD SEED MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds MAGIC VALLEY FELLOWSHIP HALL INC ↗
- Who funds MV JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BECAUSE KIDS GRIEVE INC ↗
- Who funds Blanket Blessings Inc ↗
- Who funds Visions Charities Inc ↗
- Who funds EAST END PROVIDERS ↗
- Who funds La Posada Inc ↗
- Who funds MAGIC VALLEY LAND TRUST LLC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Janice Seagraves Family Foundation Inc · First Federal Foundation Inc · Magic Valley Festival of Giving Inc · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Twin Falls County Health Initiatives Trustltd · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · St Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Racing for Charity Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Racing for Charity Inc?
Find your warmest path to Racing for Charity Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.