Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

St Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd

To improve the health of people in the communities we serve.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$959k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$6.5MHuman Services$176kFood & Nutrition$60kCommunity Improvement$52kYouth Development$32kHousing & Shelter$21kPhilanthropy$11kOther$1.4M
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $120k
  • $250k+1 grant · $959k
$959,087
Median grant
1
States reached
$325M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Lukes Health Foundation Ltd$959,087
College Of Southern ID$119,610
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $134k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Minidoka County Senior Center Inc: $6k → 12%Jerome County Senior Citizens: $8k → 12%West End Senior Citizens Inc: $5k → 11%Jerome County Senior Citizens: $6k → 12%Living Independence Network: $15k → 8%Living Independence Network: $11k → 8%LIVING INDEPENDENCE Network: $6k → 8%Voices Against Violence: $20k → 11%Voices Against Violence: $15k → 11%Twin Falls Senior Citizens Federation Inc: $14k → 11%Mustard Seed Ministries: $9k → 11%Twin Falls Senior Citizens Federation: $7k → 11%Rising Stars Therapeutic Riding: $6k → 11%YMCA Of Twin Falls Inc: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$8.1M · 18 repeat orgs$184k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
16

Total granted

$8.1M
$184k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+18%

Still filing today

78%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd
    8× · 2017–2024 · $6.3M · revenue +67%
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +33%
  • VA
    VOLUNTEERS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $60k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • TF
    TWIN FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT 411
    one grant, 2019 · $82k
  • JJ
    JEROME JT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 261
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
  • UW
    United Way of South Central Idaho Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $11k · revenue -63%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Senior Citizens Community Center Inc

Providing nutritional services through congregational and home delivered meals to the elderly and other special interest services.

Human Services
2
Meridian Area Senior Citizens Association

The program provides transportation, outreach services, meals, and recreational programs to the community's elderly citizens. The program serves more than 21,000 senior citizens in Meridian, Idaho. Seniors are transported for medical care,…

Human Services
3
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
4
Idaho Elks Rehab Hospital Inc
Health
5
Gem County Senior Community Center Corporation

To provide nutritious meals and social activities at the center as well as home delivered meals and transportation for seniors

Human Services
6
Senior Citizens Dollar a Month Club

To improve and promote the general welfare of those 60 years of age and older, and those with disabilities or otherwise unable to care for themselves. Primarily to provide meals to seniors.

Human Services
7
Ageless Senior Citizens Inc

Senior citizen center serving eligible people living in the kimberly, hansen and murtaugh, idaho area.

Human Services
8
Aberdeen Senior Citizens of Bingham County Inc

We serve the senior citizens of Southern Bingham County, and the Citizens of Aberdeen, Idaho Meals on Wheels and congregate meals onsite.

Human Services
9
Riverton Senior Citizens Center

To provide service for Riverton's seniors that enrich the participantslife, well being, daily activities and independence.

Human Services
10
Stillwater Senior Citizens Center

Serving senior citizens in area

—
11
Boise Basin Senior Citizens Inc

Provide Nutritious meals to citizens of East Boise County Most of our recipients are elderly or disabled

Human Services
12
Belgrade Senior Center

The Mission of the Belgrade Senior Center is to promote friendship and provide nutritional, social, recreational, educational, health and fitness, and information services for individuals age 50 and older in the Belgrade and surrounding…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Visions Charities Inc and the most unlike its peers is West End Senior Citizen Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%5%<5yr17%0%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr13%32%20–35yr10%41%35–55yr14%5%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr17%0%5–10yr20%2%10–20yr13%83%20–35yr10%15%35–55yr14%0%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
16%
471/2,939

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/26
Grantees still filing
17/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

St Luke's Health Foundation Ltd — $6,338,547 · HealthSt Luke's Health Foundation Ltd+4 more — $185,540 · HealthCOLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO FOUNDATION — $1,044,133 · OtherCOLLEGE OF SOUTHER…TWIN FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT 411 — $82,176 · OtherTWIN FALLS SCHOOL …TWIN FALLS COUNTY CLERK — $78,500 · OtherTWIN FALLS COUNTY …South Central District Health — $69,400 · Other+9 more — $86,455 · Other+9 moreVOLUNTEERS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC — $60,480 · Human ServicesLIVING INDEPENDENCE NETWORK COPORATION — $32,000 · Human ServicesTWIN FALLS SENIOR CITIZENS FEDERATION INC — $31,000 · Human ServicesJEROME COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS — $13,700 · Human ServicesMUSTARD SEED MINISTRIES INC — $9,000 · Human ServicesBECAUSE KIDS GRIEVE INC — $7,000 · Human ServicesRISING STARS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC — $6,400 · Human ServicesMINIDOKA COUNTY SENIOR CENTER INC — $6,000 · Human Services+2 more — $10,500 · Human ServicesIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE — $54,500 · Food & NutritionGOODING COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS ORGANIZATION INC — $5,200 · Food & NutritionINTERLINK VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS INC — $52,325 · Community ImprovementBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MAGIC VALLEY — $31,950 · Youth DevelopmentSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC — $20,935 · Housing & ShelterUnited Way of South Central Idaho Inc — $10,500 · Philanthropy
Health$6,524,087Other$1,360,664Human Services$176,080Food & Nutrition$59,700Community Improvement$52,325Youth Development$31,950Housing & Shelter$20,935Philanthropy$10,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSt Luke's Health Foundation Ltd — $6,338,547 over 8y, 6.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO FOUNDATION — $1,044,133 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetWELLNESS TREE COMMUNITY CLINIC — $95,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetVOLUNTEERS AGAINST VIOLENCE INC — $60,480 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE — $54,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINTERLINK VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS INC — $52,325 over 3y, 11% of budgetVisions Charities Inc — $49,800 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFamily Health Services Corporation — $35,740 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLIVING INDEPENDENCE NETWORK COPORATION — $32,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MAGIC VALLEY — $31,950 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTWIN FALLS SENIOR CITIZENS FEDERATION INC — $31,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC — $20,935 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBUSINESS PLUS INC — $17,500 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetJubilee House Incorporated — $15,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetJEROME COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS — $13,700 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetMagic Valley Rehabilitation Services IN — $11,580 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetUnited Way of South Central Idaho Inc — $10,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetMUSTARD SEED MINISTRIES INC — $9,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetBECAUSE KIDS GRIEVE INC — $7,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetRISING STARS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC — $6,400 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetE Street Community Center — $5,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWEST END SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetTHE SPEEDY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Luke's Health Syst…Idaho Community Found…First Federal Foundat…Magic Valley Festival…Twin Falls County Hea…Lamb Weston Charitabl…Blue Cross of Idaho F…Janice Seagraves Fami…Laura Moore Cunningha…Idaho Foodbank Wareho…Racing for Charity IncUnited Way of South C…
St Luke's Health System LtdID51.2× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Luke's Health System Ltd · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · First Federal Foundation Inc · Magic Valley Festival of Giving Inc · Twin Falls County Health Initiatives Trustltd · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · Janice Seagraves Family Foundation Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Idaho Foodbank Warehouse · Racing for Charity Inc · United Way of South Central Idaho Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization St Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines