· Private foundation
Janice Seagraves Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k54 grants · $214k
- $10k–50k22 grants · $377k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $425k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DONOR ADVISORY FUND | $250,000 |
| PEOPLE FOR PETS | $126,500 |
| FIGHTERS CHANCE | $120,000 |
| OPTIMIST YOUTH HOUSE | $75,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $53,500 |
| COLLEGE OF IDAHO | $50,000 |
| BURLEY PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $30,584 |
| VOICES AGAINST VIOLENCE | $25,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB | $25,000 |
| CITY OF TWIN FALLS | $23,960 |
| MAGIC VALLEY PUBLIC SAFETY GRANT COMMISSION | $22,400 |
| COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE PANTRY | $21,000 |
| FILER SENIOR HAVEN | $20,000 |
| CAMP RAINBOW GOLD | $20,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $197k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.
100 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 65 since wound down; 47 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $633k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- TCThe College of Idaho Inc5× · 2017–2025 · $212k · revenue +66%
- IVINTERLINK VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS INC6× · 2017–2024 · $130k · revenue +2%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MAGIC VALLEY4× · 2017–2020 · $105k · revenue +167%
Funded once
- CSCHARLES SCHWAB DONOR ADVISED FUNDone grant, 2024 · $401k
- OFOptimists Foundationone grant, 2018 · $120k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $116k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide Nutritious meals to citizens of East Boise County Most of our recipients are elderly or disabled
Providing meals and activities for senior citizens
Idaho Animal Rescue Network is a 501(c)(3) non-profit based in Idaho that works in Idaho and Eastern Washington to educate, advocate, and network with other rescues and law enforcement in Idaho regarding animal cruelty and neglect. We are…
We serve the senior citizens of Southern Bingham County, and the Citizens of Aberdeen, Idaho Meals on Wheels and congregate meals onsite.
How this is measured
63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 315 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FIGHTERS CHANCE ↗
- Who funds The College of Idaho Inc ↗
- Who funds INTERLINK VOLUNTEER CAREGIVERS INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MAGIC VALLEY ↗
- Who funds MAGIC VALLEY PUBLIC SAFETY GRANT COMMISSION INC ↗
- Who funds RACING FOR CHARITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE TOOTH FAIRY INC ↗
- Who funds Twin Falls County Fair & Rodeo Foundatio ↗
- Who funds THE CRISIS HOTLINE INC ↗
- Who funds BLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA'S CAUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Filer Senior Haven Inc ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: First Federal Foundation Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Racing for Charity Inc · Twin Falls County Health Initiatives Trustltd · Magic Valley Festival of Giving Inc · Whitten-Welch Foundation Kelly Smith · Idaho Power Foundation Inc · St Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Janice Seagraves Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Janice Seagraves Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Janice Seagraves Family’s filings →