Skip to content
Jane Alexandra Storm Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Jane Alexandra Storm Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$104k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$325kHuman Services$167kHealth$156kEducation$89kYouth Development$80kEnvironment$54kAnimals$49kPhilanthropy$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $89k
$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOR THE GOOD$20,000
ST ANTHONY'S HEALTH CTR FNE PROGRA$17,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
THE CYCLE EFFECT$15,000
CMC MOUNTAIN SCHOLARS PROGRAM$12,000
CASA OF THE CONTINENTAL DIVIDE$10,000
HIGH COUNTRY CONSERVATION CENTER$5,000
TREETOP CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$5,000
FAR VIEW HORSE RESCUE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%THE DZI FOUNDATION: $25k → 7%ADVOCATES OF LAKE COUNTY: $4k → 11%THE DZI FOUNDATION: $20k → 7%THE DZI FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$830k · 18 repeat orgs$151k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
9

Total granted

$830k
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+114%

Still filing today

67%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsCivil RightsCrime & LegalHuman ServicesEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ADVOCATES FOR VICTIMS OF ASSAULT INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $216k · revenue +99%
  • TC
    The Cycle Effect
    9× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +191%
  • HC
    HIGH COUNTRY CONSERVATION CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $54k · revenue +213%

Funded once

  • FI
    Family Intercultural Resource Cente
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • AW
    AARK WILDLIFE REHABILITATION EDUCAT
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • BO
    Breckenridge Outdoor Education Centergraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +100%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Womens Resource Center in Durango

Womens Resource Center (WRC) in Durango connects women and girls to the resources and programming that will help them reach their full potential in all states of their life.

—
2
Advocates for Children

To provide, train and coordinate volunteer services to abused and neglected children in the 18th & 23rd Judicial District, Colorado.

Civil Rights
3
Rocky Mountain Victim Law Center

Legal advocacy and representation to victims of violent crimes.

Crime & Legal
4
Colorado Coalition Against Domestic Violence

Advancing the well-being of all coloradans through relationships free from abuse and oppression.

Human Services
5
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
6
Colorado Jobs With Justice Inc

Advance workers rights & social justice through building sustained relationships and taking direct action to create concrete change in the lives of working families

Employment
7
Domestic Violence Initiative for Women With Disabilities

Empowering victims and creating a bridge to close the gap for people with disabilities through discovery of self-resiliency by providing support and services.

—
8
Voices for Children Inc

The mission of voices for children casa is to help break the cycle of child abuse and neglect in boulder county through the use of trained casa (court appointed special advocate) volunteers. the casas provide investigation, advocacy,…

Civil Rights
9
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
10
Sage Advocacy Center

Educate, advocate, and empower to end violence.

—
11
Tu Casa Incorporated

To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.

—
12
Bicycle Colorado

We lead a passionate and growing movement that champions the interests of everyone who rides or wants to ride a bicycle in our state.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Cycle Effect; the most unlike its peers is Far View Horse Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ADVOCATES FOR VICTIMS OF ASSAULT INC: $215,750 · OtherADVOCATES FOR VICTIMS OF ASSAULT INCFamily Intercultural Resource Cente: $50,000 · OtherFamily Intercultural Resource CenteFOR THE GOOD PERIOD: $47,000 · OtherFOR THE GOOD PERIODIndividual grant recipient: $32,558 · OtherIndividual grant recipientA WOMAN'S PLACE: $20,000 · OtherAsian Institute of Technology: $19,995 · OtherFAR VIEW HORSE RESCUE: $39,000 · OtherFAR VIEW HORSE RESCUETHE SUMMIT FOUNDATION: $33,000 · OtherTHE SUMMIT FOUNDATIONTHE KEYSTONE SCIENCE SCHOOL INC: $22,000 · OtherFor The Good: $20,000 · Other+11 more: $73,500 · Other+11 moreCATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO FOUNDATION: $135,000 · HealthCATHOLIC HEALTH…+1 more: $4,000 · HealthThe Cycle Effect: $79,600 · Recreation & SportsThe Cycle…Breckenridge Outdoor Education Center: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsBreckenri…COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES: $55,000 · Crime & LegalTree Top Child Advocacy Center: $10,500 · Crime & LegalHIGH COUNTRY CONSERVATION CENTER: $54,000 · EnvironmentDZI FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Human ServicesADVOCATES OF LAKE COUNTY INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesCASA OF THE CONTINENTAL DIVIDE: $39,500 · Civil RightsMOUNTAIN DREAMERS: $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$572,803Health$139,000Recreation & Sports$84,600Crime & Legal$65,500Environment$54,000Human Services$54,000Civil Rights$44,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetADVOCATES FOR VICTIMS OF ASSAULT INC: $215,750 over 8y, 4.5% of budgetCATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO FOUNDATION: $135,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe Cycle Effect: $79,600 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES: $55,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetHIGH COUNTRY CONSERVATION CENTER: $54,000 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetDZI FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetCASA OF THE CONTINENTAL DIVIDE: $39,500 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetFAR VIEW HORSE RESCUE: $39,000 over 8y, 5.6% of budgetTHE SUMMIT FOUNDATION: $33,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE KEYSTONE SCIENCE SCHOOL INC: $22,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetA WOMAN'S PLACE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTree Top Child Advocacy Center: $10,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetBreckenridge Outdoor Education Center: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMOUNTAIN DREAMERS: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBuilding Hope Summit County: $4,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetADVOCATES OF LAKE COUNTY INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL REPERTORY ORCHESTRA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ADVOCATES FOR VICTIMS OF ASSAULT INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Cycle Effect ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES ↗
  • Who funds HIGH COUNTRY CONSERVATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DZI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF THE CONTINENTAL DIVIDE ↗
  • Who funds FAR VIEW HORSE RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds THE SUMMIT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE KEYSTONE SCIENCE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds For The Good ↗
  • Who funds A WOMAN'S PLACE ↗
  • Who funds Tree Top Child Advocacy Center ↗
  • Who funds Breckenridge Outdoor Education Center ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN DREAMERS ↗
  • Who funds Building Hope Summit County ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATES OF LAKE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL REPERTORY ORCHESTRA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives Founda…The Summit FoundationRocky Mountain Health…Anschutz Family Found…El Pomar FoundationAmg Charitable Gift F…Lloyd Family Foundati…Mile High United Way …Vanguard Charitable E…Morgan Stanley Global…American Endowment Fo…Donor Advised Charita…
Colorado Gives FoundationCO34.9× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Summit Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Lloyd Family Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Jane Alexandra Storm Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Jane Alexandra Storm Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jane Alexandra Storm’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home