· Public charity
The Summit Foundation
For over 40 years, THE SUMMIT FOUNDATION has been the trusted partner in supporting the entire summit county community and providing strong leadership to address the most pressing community needs.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 107 grants below total $4,132,404 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,972,323 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $839,919 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k22 grants · $152k
- $10k–50k68 grants · $1.4M
- $50k–250k16 grants · $1.8M
- $250k+1 grant · $756k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SUMMIT SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-1 | $755,500 |
| THE BRUNETTI FAMILY FOUNDATION | $247,113 |
| FAMILY & INTERCULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER (FIRC) | $242,712 |
| ELEVATED COMMUNITY HEALTH | $213,850 |
| THEATRE SILCO | $163,850 |
| COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE | $153,000 |
| SMART BELLIES | $104,500 |
| FROM THE HEART PRODUCTIONS INC | $100,000 |
| HIGH COUNTRY CONSERVATION CENTER | $86,000 |
| ARISE | $84,628 |
| BUILDING HOPE SUMMIT COUNTY | $76,590 |
| STARTING HEARTS | $72,505 |
| BRECKENRIDGE OUTDOOR EDUCATION CENTER (BOEC) | $70,000 |
| BRECKENRIDGE CREATIVE ARTS | $67,100 |
| MOUNTAIN TOP EXPLORIUM | $55,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.
155 repeat relationships — 93 still active in FY2025, 62 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $420k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSUMMIT COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER DBA FAMILY & INTERCULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER8× · 2017–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +101%
- SCSUMMIT COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC INC8× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +146%
- GCGRAND COUNTY RURAL HEALTH NETWORK INC9× · 2017–2025 · $846k · revenue +150%
Funded once
- SCSUMMIT COUNTY SCHOOLSone grant, 2023 · $250k
- SSSUMMIT SCHOOL DISTRICT RE-1one grant, 2018 · $129k
- SSSUMMIT SCHOOL DISTRICT-PRESCHOOL PROGRAMone grant, 2017 · $70k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To empower visitors and locals to explore, learn about and protect the spectacular public lands of Southwest Colorado.
The Friends of Mount Evans & Lost Creek Wilderness (FOMELC) is a 501(c)3 charitable organization founded in November 2005. FOMELC is a 100% volunteer non-profit organization. We offer volunteer opportunities for all ages, physical…
Stewardship of climbing access areas and climbing access trails.
The Boulder Mountainbike Alliance exists to serve as a positive voice for mountain biking in the greater Boulder County, Colorado area by improving the trail experience for all users through social rides and events, advocacy, and trail…
To ensure business success for our members and to foster community-wide economic vitality by providing resources, educational opportunities,and business connections. We unite key stakeholders, lead with a clear vision of the future and…
SummitStone provides comprehensive behavioral health services across all care levels: 24/7 crisis services, inpatient and outpatient treatment, housing, residential care, and peer support. We partner with law enforcement, schools, and…
Protecting the open land and special places of the roaring fork and middle colorado river valleys for wildlife, agriculture, and community forever.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sos Outreach and the most unlike its peers is Doctors to the World. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
173 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 173 of the 240 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SUMMIT COUNTY RESOURCE CENTER DBA FAMILY & INTERCULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds THE KEYSTONE SCIENCE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds GRAND COUNTY RURAL HEALTH NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE DILLON FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS DBA THEATRE SILCO ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR VICTIMS OF ASSAULT INC ↗
- Who funds Building Hope Summit County ↗
- Who funds HIGH COUNTRY CONSERVATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds Breckenridge Outdoor Education Center ↗
- Who funds Summit County Child Care Resource & Referral Agency ↗
- Who funds ZOOMERS INC ↗
- Who funds BRECKENRIDGE MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF THE CONTINENTAL DIVIDE ↗
- Who funds BRECKENRIDGE CREATIVE ARTS ↗
- Who funds TEAM SUMMIT ↗
- Who funds SMART BELLIES ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL REPERTORY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds TIMBERLINE ADULT DAY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Summit County Preschool ↗
- Who funds Starting Hearts ↗
- Who funds Backstage Theatre Inc ↗
- Who funds SOS OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds The Cycle Effect ↗
- Who funds Summit Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds BRUNETTI FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Friends of the Dillon Ranger District ↗
- Who funds COLORADO WEST REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds HIGH COUNTRY SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Timberline Learning Center ↗
- Who funds SCYH INC ↗
- Who funds BRECKENRIDGE FILM FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds CHRIST LUTHERAN EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN TOP CHILDRENS MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT COUNTY YOUTH BASEBALLINC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Lloyd Family Foundation · The Colorado Trust · F Cubed Foundation · Caring for Colorado Foundation · Jane Alexandra Storm Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Summit Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.