· Private foundation
Lloyd Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k39 grants · $88k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $108k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SHENANDOAH COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY | $22,000 |
| SHENANDOAH PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| FORT MYERS SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB | $15,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $11,000 |
| GREATER SHENANDOAH HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| WABASH ARTS CAMP | $10,000 |
| VETERANS MEMORIAL MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE | $10,000 |
| IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY | $5,000 |
| KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY | $5,000 |
| SIMPSON COLLEGE | $5,000 |
| GATES PHILANTHROPY PARTNERS | $5,000 |
| SHENANDOAH IOWA EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY | $5,000 |
| THE WABASH TRACE NATURE TRAIL | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $78k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches4× · 2021–2025 · $71k · revenue +27%
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +1%- TFThe Food Bank for Larimer County3× · 2023–2025 · $15k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- SMSHENANDOAH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -44%
- ECESSEX CHILD CARE CENTER INCone grant, 2023 · $100k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…
To empower visitors and locals to explore, learn about and protect the spectacular public lands of Southwest Colorado.
Sierra watch secures conservation outcomes to protect the natural resources, mountain communities, and timeless values of the tahoe sierra.
Summit land conservancy works with utah communities to conserve land and water for the benefit of the people and nature.
We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.
Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
Together we create solutions for a better life.
The glacier national park conservancy works to preserve and protect glacier national park for future generations.
Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…
To inspire a passionate community to forge an enduring legacy now and for future generations. this mission is attained by building a community endowment, helping donors address community needs and providing philanthropic leadership.
Conservation legacy engages future leaders who protect, restore, and enhance our nation's lands through community-based service.in 2024, conservation legacy engaged 2,524 participants who completed over 1.5 million service hours on public…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sos Outreach and the most unlike its peers is Shenandoah Public Library Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 38. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 13% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SHENANDOAH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds SHENANDOAH IOWA EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHENANDOAH PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GATES PHILANTHROPY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER SHENANDOAH HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds The Food Bank for Larimer County ↗
- Who funds Simpson College ↗
- Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER SHENANDOAH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds MORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PSORIASIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE AMYLOIDOSIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT COMMUNITY CARE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds Washington Alpine Club Inc ↗
- Who funds POUDRE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds WOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds AVENUE SCHOLARS IOWA ↗
- Who funds Summit Education Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Summit Foundation · Pella Rolscreen Foundation · Steve and Trish Shapiro Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · The Denver Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Slifer Smith & Frampton Foundation · The Moniker Foundation · The Janus Henderson Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lloyd Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Lloyd Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Lloyd Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.