How much did JANE ALEXANDRA STORM FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of JANE ALEXANDRA STORM FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

—

2020

—

2021

—

2022

education

2023

education

2024

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k6 grants · $24k
$10k–50k6 grants · $103k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.3M

Total assets

Largest grants

ADVOCATES FOR VICTIMS OF ASSAULT$25,000
FOR THE GOOD PERIOD$20,000
SUMMIT MEDICAL CENTER HEALTH FOUNDATION$20,000
THE CYCLE EFFECT$15,100
Sharmila Shyangtan$12,753
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES$10,000
HIGH COUNTRY CONSERVATION CENTER$5,000
TREETOP CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$5,000
Women Of The Summit$5,000
FAR VIEW HORSE RESCUE$5,000
National Repertory Orchestra$3,000
PEO International$1,250

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7% — the area typically sits at 7%. 7% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$818k · 19 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$818k

$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%

+341%

Still filing today

58%

43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Recreation & SportsCivil RightsCrime & LegalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AF
ADVOCATES FOR VICTIMS OF ASSAULT
8× · 2017–2024 · $216k · revenue +99%
TC
THE CYCLE EFFECT
8× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +191%
CA
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
4× · 2021–2024 · $55k · revenue +52%

Funded once

FI
Family Intercultural Resource Cente
one grant, 2022 · $50k
AW
AARK WILDLIFE REHABILITATION EDUCAT
one grant, 2019 · $10k
MD
MOUNTAIN DREAMERSgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +705%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Casa of the Pikes Peak Region

Casa of the pikes peak region provides a volunteer's voice in court for children who are victims of abuse, neglect or domestic conflict and promotes community awareness of these issues to ensure safe and permanent homes.

Civil Rights

Hill Country Casa Inc

Hill country casa provides trained court-appointed volunteers to serve as advocates for children who come before the courts as victims of abuse or neglect

Civil Rights

Advocates for Children

To provide, train and coordinate volunteer services to abused and neglected children in the 18th Judicial District, Colorado.

Civil Rights

Sexual Assault Victim Advocate Center

To provide direct service advocacy and support to those affected by sexual assault in northern colorado.

Education

Womens Resource Center in Durango

Womens Resource Center (WRC) in Durango connects women and girls to the resources and programming that will help them reach their full potential in all states of their life.

—

Voices for Children Inc

The mission of voices for children casa is to help break the cycle of child abuse and neglect in boudler county through the use of trained casa (court appointed special advocate) volunteers. the casas provide investigation, advocacy,…

Civil Rights

Clear Creek County Advocates

Assistance is provided to victims of assault, battered victims, and victims of other forms of physical, sexual and mental abuse. Advocacy, education and direct 24 hour crisis intervention and services are provided in the Clear Creek County…

Human Services

Casa of the High Plains Inc

To provide trained, court-appointed volunteers who investigate, monitor, and serve as advocates in court to help abused and neglected children secure permanent placement in safe, nurturing homes.

Crime & Legal

Advocates Against Domestic Assault

Provide shelter and counseling to domestic assault victims

Human Services

Child Advocates - Denver Casa

Child advocates - denver casa's mission is to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in denver juvenile court through the services of specially selected and trained community volunteers from a variety of…

Civil Rights

Mountain Circuit Casa Inc

To provide screened trained and supervised community volunteers to be advocates for children in the court system

Crime & Legal

Northwest Rocky Mountain Casa

The mission of northwest rocky mountain casa is to inspire, educate and empower community volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused, neglected and at-risk children to help ensure safty and permanency in their lives.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Cycle Effect and the most unlike its peers is National Repertory Orchestra Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

16/16

Grantees still filing

15/16

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$624,803Recreation & Sports$69,600Crime & Legal$60,500Human Services$54,000Civil Rights$34,500Animals$34,000Philanthropy$33,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Summit FoundationCO33.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Summit Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Slifer Smith & Frampton Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation JANE ALEXANDRA STORM FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FAR VIEW HORSE RESCUE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~16 months of operating runway; revenue held over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 272098277 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on FAR VIEW HORSE RESCUE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 16 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 6% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Jane Alexandra Storm Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Jane Alexandra Storm Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

JANE ALEXANDRA STORM FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Jane Alexandra Storm Foundation?

More from the funding graph

JANE ALEXANDRA STORM FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Jane Alexandra Storm Foundation?

More from the funding graph