· Private foundation
Jane Alexandra Storm Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $89k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOR THE GOOD | $20,000 |
| ST ANTHONY'S HEALTH CTR FNE PROGRA | $17,000 |
| THE CYCLE EFFECT | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| CMC MOUNTAIN SCHOLARS PROGRAM | $12,000 |
| CASA OF THE CONTINENTAL DIVIDE | $10,000 |
| TREETOP CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER | $5,000 |
| FAR VIEW HORSE RESCUE | $5,000 |
| HIGH COUNTRY CONSERVATION CENTER | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFADVOCATES FOR VICTIMS OF ASSAULT INC8× · 2017–2024 · $216k · revenue +99%
- TCThe Cycle Effect9× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +191%
- HCHIGH COUNTRY CONSERVATION CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $54k · revenue +213%
Funded once
- FIFamily Intercultural Resource Centeone grant, 2022 · $50k
- AWAARK WILDLIFE REHABILITATION EDUCATone grant, 2019 · $10k
- BOBreckenridge Outdoor Education Centergraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +100%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Womens Resource Center (WRC) in Durango connects women and girls to the resources and programming that will help them reach their full potential in all states of their life.
To provide, train and coordinate volunteer services to abused and neglected children in the 18th & 23rd Judicial District, Colorado.
Legal advocacy and representation to victims of violent crimes.
Advancing the well-being of all coloradans through relationships free from abuse and oppression.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
Advance workers rights & social justice through building sustained relationships and taking direct action to create concrete change in the lives of working families
Empowering victims and creating a bridge to close the gap for people with disabilities through discovery of self-resiliency by providing support and services.
The mission of voices for children casa is to help break the cycle of child abuse and neglect in boulder county through the use of trained casa (court appointed special advocate) volunteers. the casas provide investigation, advocacy,…
Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…
Educate, advocate, and empower to end violence.
To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.
We lead a passionate and growing movement that champions the interests of everyone who rides or wants to ride a bicycle in our state.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Cycle Effect and the most unlike its peers is Far View Horse Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR VICTIMS OF ASSAULT INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Cycle Effect ↗
- Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES ↗
- Who funds HIGH COUNTRY CONSERVATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds DZI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CASA OF THE CONTINENTAL DIVIDE ↗
- Who funds FAR VIEW HORSE RESCUE ↗
- Who funds THE SUMMIT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE KEYSTONE SCIENCE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds For The Good ↗
- Who funds A WOMAN'S PLACE ↗
- Who funds Tree Top Child Advocacy Center ↗
- Who funds Breckenridge Outdoor Education Center ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN DREAMERS ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES OF LAKE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Building Hope Summit County ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL REPERTORY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Summit Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Lloyd Family Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Jane Alexandra Storm Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.