Skip to content

· Private foundation

James N McCoy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$11M
Granted FY2025still arriving
68
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$2.4M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$7.7MHuman Services$6.2MHealth$3.7MFood & Nutrition$3.6MYouth Development$2.8MPhilanthropy$1.8MReligion$1.1MHousing & Shelter$925kOther$0
02FY2025 · 68 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k32 grants · $777k
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+12 grants · $9.2M
$40,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$225M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK$2,375,000
PRESBYTERIAN MANOR INC$1,550,000
UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION$1,000,000
CHESTERTON ACADEMY OF WICHITA FALLS$750,000
YMCA OF WICHITA FALLS$750,000
WICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC$575,000
MIDWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC$520,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE FORT WORTH INC$450,000
WICHITA FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$337,750
WICHITA FALLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION$320,000
HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS$300,000
ST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH OF WINDTHORST$250,000
SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC$150,000
A BUNCH OF RAGAMUFFINS$145,640
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WICHITA FALLS$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $9.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $69k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE FORT WORTH INC: $450k → 11%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $40k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE FORT WORTH INC: $40k → 11%A BUNCH OF RAGAMUFFINS: $146k → 19%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $430k → 9%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $35k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE FORT WORTH INC: $40k → 11%THE ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY: $35k → 16%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $300k → 9%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $30k → 10%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $280k → 9%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $25k → 10%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $220k → 9%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $25k → 10%HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS: $200k → 9%WHISPERS OF HOPE HORSE FARM: $56k → 9%THE ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY: $25k → 16%WHISPERS OF HOPE HORSE FARM: $30k → 9%WHISPERS OF HOPE HORSE FARM: $30k → 9%WHISPERS OF HOPE HORSEFARM: $30k → 9%YMCA OF WICHITA FALLS: $250k → 16%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY OF WEST TEXAS INC: $30k → 16%UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 16%YMCA OF WICHITA FALLS: $750k → 16%YMCA OF WICHITA FALLS: $750k → 16%YMCA OF WICHITA FALLS: $500k → 16%THE GENESIS PLACE DBA STRAIGHT STREET: $290k → 16%UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $225k → 16%UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $217k → 16%SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC: $150k → 16%CHILD CARE INC: $65k → 16%SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC: $50k → 16%CHILD CARE: $50k → 16%THE GENESIS PLACE DBA STRAIGHT STREET: $46k → 16%CHILD CARE INC: $40k → 16%CHILD CARE: $40k → 16%GENESIS PLACE: $35k → 16%CHILD CARE INC: $34k → 16%SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC: $30k → 16%SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS: $30k → 16%SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS: $30k → 16%SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC: $30k → 16%INTERFAITH MINISTRIES OF WICHITA FALLS INC: $25k → 16%INTERFAITH MINISTRIES OF WICHITA FALLS INC: $25k → 16%PRESBYTERIAN MANOR INC: $1.6M → 16%PRESBYTERIAN MANOR: $200k → 16%PRESBYTERIAN MANOR: $100k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$27M · 86 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

86 repeat relationships: 61 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

86
25

Total granted

$27M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
0%

Still filing today

72%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    WICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK
    5× · 2020–2025 · $3.1M · revenue +48%
  • YM
    Young Mens Christian Association of Wichita Falls
    4× · 2020–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +40%
  • PM
    Presbyterian Manor Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF AG SCIENCE
    one grant, 2024 · $200k · 26% of their budget
  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • TT
    TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

Crime & Legal
2
North Texas Parent & Child Development Inc

The organization is dedicated to providing quality, comprehensive services to pregnant women, infants, and toddlers. teaming with other agencies enables them to help each child and family achieve social competency. early head start…

—
3
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

—
4
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
5
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
6
Casa of Williamson County Texas

CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.

Crime & Legal
7
Christmas in Action

In partnership with the community, christmas in action rehabilitates the homes of low income elderly and low income disabled so that they may continue to live in warmth, safety and independence.

Housing & Shelter
8
West Central Texas Workforce Development Board Inc

To support and compliment the work of Workforce Solutions of West Central Texas Board, which is responsible for the planning, oversight, and evaluation of a consolidated workforce system for the 19 County West Central Texas region.

Employment
9
Caritas of Waco

To provide emergency/supplemental assistance in the form of food, clothing, household items, utility, rent and mortgage aid to people in need in the waco community.also provides case management assistance to people wanting to become…

Human Services
10
Wichita County Community Foundation Inc

The wichita county community foundation is a nonprofit, non-sectarian organization dedicated to preserving local wealth so the communities in and around leoti and wichita county will forever remain attractive places to live, work and raise…

Community Improvement
11
Wichita Collegiate School

We exist to inspire all students to be the best versions of themselves through a transformative education grounded in academic excellence within our inclusive community.

Education
12
Casa of West Texas

The mission of casa of west texas is to recruit, train and support committed volunteers who are appointed by the court to advocate for the best interest of children in the foster care system.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Aid Society of West Tx Inc; the most unlike its peers is Whispers of Hope Horse Farm. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
80/81
Grantees still filing
46/81
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Young Mens Christian Association of Wichita Falls: $2,250,000 · Human ServicesYoung Mens Christian Association o…Presbyterian Manor Inc: $1,850,000 · Human ServicesPresbyterian Manor IncUNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $1,452,200 · Human ServicesUNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE FOUNDA…Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc: $1,430,100 · Human ServicesHospice of Wichita Falls IncCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH: $530,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT…THE GENESIS PLACE INC: $415,000 · Human ServicesSENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC DBA THE KITCHEN: $320,000 · Human Services+9 more: $1,159,140 · Human Services+9 moreMIDWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY: $3,600,000 · OtherMIDWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITYBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WICHITA FALLS: $1,295,600 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WICHITA FALLSWICHITA FALLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $600,000 · OtherUNITED REGIONAL FOUNDATION: $445,000 · OtherArts Council Wichita Falls Area Inc: $450,000 · Other+72 more: $5,863,310 · Other+72 moreWICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK: $3,054,600 · Food & NutritionWICHITA FAL…+2 more: $30,000 · Food & NutritionMidwestern State University Foundation Inc: $1,320,000 · EducationMidwester…CHESTERTON ACADEMY OF WICHITA FALLS: $750,000 · EducationCHESTERTO…FRIENDS OF AG SCIENCE: $200,000 · EducationFRIENDS O…CHRIST ACADEMY: $151,000 · EducationCHRIST AC…WICHITA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $136,750 · Education+4 more: $87,000 · EducationWichita Falls Area Community Foundation: $1,361,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $20,000 · PhilanthropyWICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC: $800,000 · ReligionCHRIST COUNSELING MINISTRY INC: $200,000 · Religion+1 more: $25,000 · ReligionBEACON LIGHTHOUSE INC: $192,600 · HealthRathgeber Hospitality House: $165,000 · HealthFIRST STEP OF WICHITA FALLS INC: $152,000 · HealthNorth Texas Rehabilitation Center Inc: $150,500 · HealthNorth Central Texas Community Health Care Center: $100,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $35,000 · Health+1 more: $10,000 · Health
Human Services$9,406,440Other$12,253,910Food & Nutrition$3,084,600Education$2,644,750Philanthropy$1,381,000Religion$1,025,000Health$805,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK: $3,054,600 over 5y, 12% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Association of Wichita Falls: $2,250,000 over 4y, 8.5% of budgetPresbyterian Manor Inc: $1,850,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetUNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $1,452,200 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetHospice of Wichita Falls Inc: $1,430,100 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetWichita Falls Area Community Foundation: $1,361,000 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetMidwestern State University Foundation Inc: $1,320,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetWICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC: $800,000 over 4y, 7.7% of budgetCHESTERTON ACADEMY OF WICHITA FALLS: $750,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH: $530,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetArts Council Wichita Falls Area Inc: $450,000 over 6y, 9.2% of budgetTHE GENESIS PLACE INC: $415,000 over 5y, 39% of budgetHUNDRED CLUB OF WICHITA FALLS: $384,400 over 4y, 58% of budgetWICHITA FALLS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC: $350,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC DBA THE KITCHEN: $320,000 over 6y, 7.3% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $235,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPETS LOW COST SPAY & NEUTER: $235,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetCHILD CARE INC: $229,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES: $224,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCHRIST COUNSELING MINISTRY INC: $200,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetFRIENDS OF AG SCIENCE: $200,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetBEACON LIGHTHOUSE INC: $192,600 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetBOYS CLUB OF BURKBURNETT BURKBURNETT BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $182,000 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetINHERITANCE ADOPTIONS: $180,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetTEXOMA MOTHER & UNBORN BABY CARE INC PREGNANCY HELP CENTER: $170,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetWHISPERS OF HOPE HORSE FARM: $166,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetRathgeber Hospitality House: $165,000 over 6y, 5.4% of budgetPARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $163,900 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetVERNON COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $160,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetFIRST STEP OF WICHITA FALLS INC: $152,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetCHRIST ACADEMY: $151,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetNorth Texas Rehabilitation Center Inc: $150,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetPatsy's House Children's Advocacy Center: $150,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetA BUNCH OF RAGAMUFFINS: $145,640 over 1y, 58% of budgetTHE ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY INC: $139,500 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetWICHITA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $136,750 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetCAMP FIRE NORTH TEXAS: $129,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetTEXAS ACADEMY 4: $125,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetChild Advocates CASA of Red River: $120,000 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetHAPPY HANDS EDUCATION CENTER INC: $120,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetNorthwest Texas Council of Boy Scouts of America: $110,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetNorth Central Texas Community Health Care Center: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWICHITA ADULT LITERACY COUNCIL INC: $100,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetRiver Bend Nature Works Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES INC: $90,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetALL HANDS CULTURAL COMMUNITY CENTER: $90,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetKMOC FM: $80,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WICHITA FALLS INC: $75,000 over 2y, 7.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wichita Falls Area Community FoundationTX107.5× affinity50 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation · Bryant Edwards Foundation Inc · J S Bridwell Foundation · The Fain Foundation · The Priddy Foundation · Donnell Foundation · Guinn Foundation Inc · Dillard Family Foundation · Gene Conley Foundation · Perkins-Prothro Foundation · Libra Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James N McCoy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James N McCoy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to James N McCoy Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to James N McCoy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 117 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James N McCoy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph