Skip to content

Texas · Nonprofit

Child Advocates CASA of Red River

Child Advocates CASA of Red River (Texas) receives grants from 14 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,276,418 to it, the largest being TEXAS CASA INC ($2,845,507). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$951k
Funders on record
14
Grants received
$4.3M
Net assets
$919k
11/14 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 72%
01What it does

What Child Advocates CASA of Red River does

Mission

Child advocates train court appointed special advocates (casa's) to be the "voice" for abused and neglected children in wichita, archer, clay, and mountague counties in texas. As guardians ad litem, casas make recommenddations for safe, permanent and loving homes for children.

As stated on its FY2023 Form 990.

Program

  1. Improve the lives of abused and neglected children in Archer, Clay, Montague and Wichita counties in Texas. The organization recruits, trains, and supervises volunteers who are sworn by a judge to act as court appointed special advocates.

    $749,871 spent$941,209 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $749,871.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($541k) Expenses 100 ($508k) Net assets 100 ($594k)2018 Revenue 101 ($546k) Expenses 113 ($577k) Net assets 95 ($564k)2019 Revenue 110 ($594k) Expenses 118 ($600k) Net assets 94 ($558k)2020 Revenue 134 ($722k) Expenses 124 ($632k) Net assets 109 ($649k)2021 Revenue 169 ($914k) Expenses 161 ($818k) Net assets 125 ($745k)2022 Revenue 172 ($932k) Expenses 175 ($891k) Net assets 132 ($786k)2023 Revenue 170 ($918k) Expenses 180 ($914k) Net assets 133 ($790k)2024 Revenue 170 ($919k) Expenses 166 ($841k) Net assets 146 ($867k)2025 Revenue 176 ($951k) Expenses 177 ($899k) Net assets 155 ($919k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (176)Expenses (177)Net assets (155)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $606k to $706k (+17%).

$628k
$610k
$606k
$706k
$806k
$830k
$850k
$894k
$946k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 42% · 2018 52% · 2019 54% · 2020 55% · 2021 55% · 2022 101% · 2023 58% · 2024 98% · 2025 65%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

99% of Child Advocates CASA of Red River’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (99% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,975 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$32k
’17
−$30k
’18
−$6k
’19
$90k
’20
$96k
’21
$41k
’22
$4k
’23
$77k
’24
$52k
’25
6.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed141816151815161716
Joined·+6+2+4+11+2+6+4+2
No longer listed·24585533
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 8 funders, grant income rose $231k → $661k.

3 of 14 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 1% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Child Advocates CASA of Red River’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Child Advocates CASA of Red River leans on a few funders — its largest provides 67% of grant income and the top three 92%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

82% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Child Advocates CASA of Red River.

67%
largest funder
92%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 71% · 2018 77% · 2019 78% · 2020 65% · 2021 74% · 2022 70% · 2023 71% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

67% of Child Advocates CASA of Red River's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 79% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

98% of Child Advocates CASA of Red River's grant income comes from Texas funders.

NY
MO
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Texas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $60k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Child Advocates CASA of Red River runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 904 civil rights nonprofits its size.

Operating margin5% · above the median
Months of reserve6.3mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)7% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 904 civil rights nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like Child Advocates CASA of Red River

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

83% of spending goes to programs.

Program 83%Management 14%Fundraising 3%

Governance

18
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

98%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Child Advocates CASA of Red River: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Child Advocates CASA of Red River?
Child Advocates CASA of Red River (Texas) receives grants from 14 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,276,418 to it, the largest being TEXAS CASA INC ($2,845,507). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Child Advocates CASA of Red River have?
IRS filings report 14 organizations giving $4,276,418 in grants to Child Advocates CASA of Red River, 11 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Child Advocates CASA of Red River?
TEXAS CASA INC is the largest funder on record, with $2,845,507 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Child Advocates CASA of Red River find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Child Advocates CASA of Red River →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 14 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing