· Private foundation
Guinn Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k33 grants · $116k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $163k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY HEALTCARE CENTER | $60,000 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS OF WICHITA COUNTY | $42,500 |
| WICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK | $25,000 |
| PROJECT BACK TO SCHOOL | $20,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WICHITA FALLS | $20,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL EVANGELISM ASSOCIATION | $15,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY OF WICHITA FALLS | $15,000 |
| CHILD CARE PARTNERS | $14,000 |
| FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $11,000 |
| HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS | $9,000 |
| FIRST STEP INCOF WICHITA FALLS | $9,000 |
| CLAY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS | $8,000 |
| KMOC FM | $7,000 |
| BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION | $6,000 |
| PRESBYTERIAN CHILDRENS HOMES & SERVICES | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
46 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IEINTERNATIONAL EVANGELISM ASSOCIATION6× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +93%
- CFCAMP FIRE NORTH TEXAS3× · 2020–2024 · $65k · revenue +26%
- EIEQUIP INDIA INC4× · 2020–2023 · $61k · revenue +77%
Funded once
- WFWICHITA FALLS BOYS & GIRLS CLUBone grant, 2022 · $30k
- NCNorth Central Texas Community Health Care Centergraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +51%
- TFTEXAS FAMILY INITIATIVEone grant, 2022 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide christ-centered programs and services that lead the homeless toward self-sufficiency.
To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.
The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.
At wichita habitat for humanity, we believe everyone deserves the strength, stability, and independence that comes with a safe, affordable home. we partner with hardworking individuals and families in our community, empowering them to…
Bringing souls face to face with the Eucharistic Heart of Jesus Christ and forming missionaries of the New Evangelization. The organization has realized this mission by providing music and production services for worship events.
The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…
To engage in grant making to medical educational organizations and related charitable activities in the area of eye disease and vision disorder, and the care and treatment thereof.
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
Wichita's littlest heroes (wlh) exists to provide hope, help, and happiness to families of children ages 0-18 in the kansas area who are battling life-threatening medical conditions. wlh strives to accomplish this be being a physical and…
In partnership with the community, christmas in action rehabilitates the homes of low income elderly and low income disabled so that they may continue to live in warmth, safety and independence.
Formerly ywca wichita, the wichita family crisis center (wfcc) began operations in wichita, ks in 1907. wfcc's mission is to eliminate domestic violence in our community by supporting survivors through shelter, education & advocacy.
To drive economic growth and community advancement in the wichita region.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wichita Falls University Kiwanis Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 102 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Project Back to School ↗
- Who funds SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC DBA THE KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL EVANGELISM ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CAMP FIRE NORTH TEXAS ↗
- Who funds EQUIP INDIA INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST STEP OF WICHITA FALLS INC ↗
- Who funds PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CLAY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC ↗
- Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
- Who funds KMOC FM ↗
- Who funds North Central Texas Community Health Care Center ↗
- Who funds Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc ↗
- Who funds TEXAS RAMP PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds BOYS CLUB OF BURKBURNETT BURKBURNETT BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds HAPPY HILL FARM CHILDRENS HOME INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: James N McCoy Foundation · Bryant Edwards Foundation Inc · J S Bridwell Foundation · The Fain Foundation · Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation · The Priddy Foundation · Donnell Foundation · Kadane Foundation · Gene Conley Foundation · Leota Steed Foundation · Libra Foundation · Perkins-Prothro Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Guinn Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.