Skip to content

· Private foundation

James and Dorothy Doss Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
84
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$700k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$4.5MArts & Culture$3.3MEducation$1.5MHuman Services$1.0MReligion$467kHousing & Shelter$313kCommunity Improvement$258kHealth$195kOther$0
02FY2025 · 84 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k53 grants · $154k
  • $10k–50k28 grants · $491k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.4M
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$42M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH TEXAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$700,000
DOSS HERITAGE AND CULTURAL CENTER$450,000
WEATHERFORD CHAMBER FOUNDATION$250,000
JPS FOUNDATION$25,000
PROJECT OPPORTUNITY$25,000
FORT WORTH COUNTRY DAY$25,000
ACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES$25,000
WEATHERFORD COLLEGE$25,000
CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES$25,000
LENA POPE$25,000
HOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY$25,000
TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY$25,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS$25,000
THE WOMEN'S CENTER$25,000
PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $413k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HAPPY HILL FARM: $5k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $5k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $5k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $5k → 10%PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES AND SERVICES: $5k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH: $5k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH: $5k → 11%CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $5k → 11%LENA POPE: $25k → 11%LENA POPE: $24k → 11%LENA POPE: $22k → 11%LENA POPE: $21k → 11%LENA POPE: $20k → 11%LENA POPE: $15k → 11%LENA POPE HOME INC: $15k → 11%LENA POPE HOME: $5k → 11%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $50k → 11%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $25k → 11%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $25k → 11%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $25k → 11%CENTER OF HOPE: $10k → 8%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $25k → 11%CENTER OF HOPE: $5k → 8%CENTER OF HOPE: $5k → 8%FREEDOM HOUSE: $5k → 8%FREEDOM HOUSE: $5k → 8%FREEDOM HOUSE: $5k → 8%FREEDOM HOUSE: $5k → 8%FREEDOM HOUSE: $3k → 8%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $15k → 11%FREEDOM HOUSE: $1k → 8%FREEDOM HOUSE: $1k → 8%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $10k → 11%FREEDOM HOUSE: $1k → 8%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.9M · 94 repeat orgs$642k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

94 repeat relationships: 69 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

94
57

Total granted

$6.9M
$325k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+4%

Still filing today

34%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $317k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationPublic Safety & DisasterHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $225k · revenue +1%
  • HOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $225k · revenue +26%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES
    8× · 2017–2025 · $180k · revenue +316%

Funded once

  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS - TEXAS BIG COUNTRY CHAPTER
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • CO
    CENTER OF HOPE OF PARKER COUNTY
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • TC
    TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Future Farmers of America Foundation Inc

Building on the proven success of texas agriculture education and the texas ffa program, our mission is distinguished by the continued development, funding, and implementation of cutting edge learning opportunities focusing on academic…

Food & Nutrition
2
Communities Foundation of Texas Inc

The foundation is committed to serving charitable needs both domestically and abroad through charitable grants and services at the discretion of the board of trustees.

Philanthropy
3
Texas a&M Foundation

The texas a&m foundation builds a brighter future for texas a&m university, one relationship at a time, by uniting generosity and vision to raise support and manage endowed gifts.

Education
4
Texas Business Hall of Fame Foundation

To recognize the accomplishments and contributions of our outstanding Texas business leaders and to perpetuate and inspire the values of entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity, and community leadership in all generations of Texans.

Community Improvement
5
Dallas College Foundation Inc

Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.

Education
6
Texas a&M-Corpus Christi Foundation

For the benefit of texas a&m university - corpus christi

Education
7
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
8
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
9
Tarrant County Bar Association

The association exists to advance the science of jurisprudence; to facilitate and improve the administration of justice; to maintain and to elevate standards of professional conduct; to increase professional skills through regular…

—
10
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
11
Capital of Texas Public Telecommunications Council

Klru is a leader in public media, distinguished by its energetic engagement with the community and for the quality and creativity of content. klru illuminates the wider world of knowledge; the importance of discourse; and the many…

Arts & Culture
12
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Houston Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Grace & Orville Ritzman Childrens Fund Co Alice Ritzman. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 168 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/63
Grantees still filing
41/63
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DOSS HERITAGE AND CULTURAL CENTER: $3,060,710 · OtherDOSS HERITAGE AND CULTURAL CENTERWEATHERFORD CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $250,000 · OtherTARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY: $225,000 · OtherWEATHERFORD COLLEGE: $211,119 · Other+125 more: $2,298,137 · Other+125 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS (TAX: $4,500,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS (TAX+8 more: $167,500 · PhilanthropyCENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $180,000 · Human ServicesLENA POPE HOME INC: $146,700 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES: $30,000 · Human ServicesFREEDOM HOUSE: $26,000 · Human ServicesPARKER COUNTY CENTER OF HOPE INC: $20,000 · Human Services+3 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $225,000 · Housing & ShelterTEXAS RAMP PROJECT: $80,000 · Housing & ShelterHOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY: $225,000 · EducationTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationTEXAS BANKERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Education+4 more: $20,500 · EducationFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY: $105,000 · Arts & CultureYOUTH ORCHESTRA OF GREATER FORT WORTH: $18,000 · Arts & CultureFORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $17,000 · Arts & CultureVan Cliburn Foundation Inc: $13,500 · Arts & CultureLyric Opera of Chicago: $10,000 · Arts & CultureAMON CARTER MUSEUM OF WESTERN ART: $10,000 · Arts & CultureHistoric Fort Worth Inc: $10,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME INC: $8,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $180,000 · Health+3 more: $3,000 · Health
Other$6,044,966Philanthropy$4,667,500Human Services$422,700Housing & Shelter$305,000Education$280,500Arts & Culture$194,000Health$183,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS (TAX: $4,500,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $225,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetHOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY: $225,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $180,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $180,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetLENA POPE HOME INC: $146,700 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $120,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY: $105,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetJPS FOUNDATION: $90,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetFORT WORTH STOCK SHOW SYNDICATE: $80,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetTEXAS RAMP PROJECT: $80,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetTHE FORT WORTH PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $57,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS BOTANICAL GARDENS AND NA AMERICAN INTERPRETIVE CENTER: $38,500 over 6y, 7.3% of budgetTARRANT COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SISTER CITIES ASSOCIATION OF FORT WORTH INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCOMANCHE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $26,500 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetFREEDOM HOUSE: $26,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKER COUNTY CENTER OF HOPE INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetYOUTH ORCHESTRA OF GREATER FORT WORTH: $18,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetFORT WORTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION: $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $17,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVan Cliburn Foundation Inc: $13,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGOLDTHWAITE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTME: $11,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetSAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEATHERFORD NOON LIONS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 93% of budgetTEXAS BANKERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetLyric Opera of Chicago: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMON CARTER MUSEUM OF WESTERN ART: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHistoric Fort Worth Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COWGIRL MUSEUM AND HALL OF FAME INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $7,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALEDO ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetRIVERTREE ACADEMY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAVE GIRAFFES NOW: $5,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHAPPY HILL FARM CHILDRENS HOME INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TSTC FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BROWN COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetLILY B CLAYTON PTA: $3,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCHORISTERS GUILD: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBoy Scouts of America Longhorn Council Properties Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPASCHAL ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS (TAX ↗
  • Who funds THE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds HOWARD PAYNE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds LENA POPE HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds ACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds JPS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH STOCK SHOW SYNDICATE ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS RAMP PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE FORT WORTH PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS BOTANICAL GARDENS AND NA AMERICAN INTERPRETIVE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TARRANT COUNTY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN CHILDREN'S HOMES & SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL SISTER CITIES ASSOCIATION OF FORT WORTH INC ↗
  • Who funds COMANCHE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation IncTX48.3× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Garvey Texas Foundation Inc · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Amon G Carter Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Mary Potishman Lard Trust Walker C Friedman Co Trustee · R4 Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Adeline & George McQueen Foundation Xxxxx1007 · Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation · Ann L Rhodes and Carol Greene Rhodes · The Morris Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization James and Dorothy Doss Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from James and Dorothy Doss Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 168 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James and Dorothy Doss’ filings →

    More from the funding graph