Texas · Nonprofit
TEXAS BOTANICAL GARDENS AND NA AMERICAN INTERPRETIVE CENTER
TEXAS BOTANICAL GARDENS AND NA AMERICAN INTERPRETIVE CENTER (Texas) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $50,965 to it, the largest being JAMES AND DOROTHY DOSS FOUNDATION INC ($38,500). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2024
- $136k
- Funders on record
- 3
- Grants received
- $51k
- Net assets
- $1.5M
What Texas Botanical Gardens and Na American Interpretive Center does
Mission
The mission is to provide a dynamic interactive lifelong learning experience while identifying and preserving the prehistoric and environmental aspects of this rural region of texas
As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.
Programs
Education - variety of education programs - programs are provided to
$701 spent$1,231 earned by the program6% of program spendingDemo garden - demonstrates rain colleciton and native plants
$10,841 spentof which $1,000 as grants$9,000 earned by the program94% of program spending
The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $11,542.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $1.3M to $1.5M (+12%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 33% · 2020 9% · 2021 12%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
45% of TEXAS BOTANICAL GARDENS AND NA AMERICAN INTERPRETIVE CENTER’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Chief executive
S Reynolds
Exec director
As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.
The chief executive listed changed between the FY2017 and FY2018, and between the FY2019 and FY2020 filings.
Who funds it, year by year
2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $10k → $17k.
2 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 24% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of TEXAS BOTANICAL GARDENS AND NA AMERICAN INTERPRETIVE CENTER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
TEXAS BOTANICAL GARDENS AND NA AMERICAN INTERPRETIVE CENTER leans on a few funders — its largest provides 76% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 88% · 2022 96% · 2023 70% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of TEXAS BOTANICAL GARDENS AND NA AMERICAN INTERPRETIVE CENTER's grant income comes from Texas funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $12k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
TEXAS BOTANICAL GARDENS AND NA AMERICAN INTERPRETIVE CENTER is better cushioned than half of the 4,264 environment nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,264 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Organizations like TEXAS BOTANICAL GARDENS AND NA AMERICAN INTERPRETIVE CENTER
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Texas
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
62% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
97%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for TEXAS BOTANICAL GARDENS AND NA AMERICAN INTERPRETIVE CENTER: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds TEXAS BOTANICAL GARDENS AND NA AMERICAN INTERPRETIVE CENTER?
- TEXAS BOTANICAL GARDENS AND NA AMERICAN INTERPRETIVE CENTER (Texas) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $50,965 to it, the largest being JAMES AND DOROTHY DOSS FOUNDATION INC ($38,500). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does TEXAS BOTANICAL GARDENS AND NA AMERICAN INTERPRETIVE CENTER have?
- IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $50,965 in grants to TEXAS BOTANICAL GARDENS AND NA AMERICAN INTERPRETIVE CENTER, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of TEXAS BOTANICAL GARDENS AND NA AMERICAN INTERPRETIVE CENTER?
- JAMES AND DOROTHY DOSS FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $38,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like TEXAS BOTANICAL GARDENS AND NA AMERICAN INTERPRETIVE CENTER find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Texas Botanical Gardens and Na American Interpretive Center →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing