How much did IROQUOIS FEDERAL FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of IROQUOIS FEDERAL FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

benefitcounselingtrainingstudentsincreasenutritioncomputers

2020

systemresearchheatingupdatefinancial pandemicrepairsreplace

2021

museumwatsekalibraryvermilionfinancialscouts

2022

stagetherapeuticcrisisfairemergency shelterbuildingoutreach

2023

eastfinancial literacychildren'soperashelterhoopestonfair

2024

fieldflooroperabedsshelterfairequipment

2025

neighborhoodhealthcarelibraryartwatsekalutheranchildren's

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 83 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k74 grants · $121k
$10k–50k8 grants · $88k
$50k–250k1 grant · $55k

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

$5.4M

Total assets

Anchored by a single position — about 98% of reported assets are held in If Bancorp Inc.

Largest grants

IROQUOIS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$55,000
THE ARC OF IROQUOIS CO$14,750
DANVILLE FOUNDATION FOR INDUSTRIAL$12,000
RIVERSIDE HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$11,000
UNITED WAY OF KANKAKEE & IROQUOIS C$10,000
SCHLARMAN ACADEMY$10,000
DON MOYER BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$10,000
BALLOONS OVER VERMILION$10,000
UNITED WAY OF DANVILLE AREA$10,000
UNITED WAY OF CHAMPAIGN CO$7,500
CRISIS NURSERY$6,000
DANVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$5,000
HOOPESTON MULTI AGENCY CENTER$5,000
COUNTRY THEATRE WORKSHOP$5,000
CROSSPOINT HUMAN SERVICES$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 13%. 46% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.5M · 99 repeat orgs$217k to everyone else

99 repeat relationships — 70 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.5M

$207k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%

+51%

Still filing today

39%

29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

UW
UNITED WAY OF DANVILLE AREA
6× · 2020–2025 · $67k · revenue +12%
DM
DON MOYER BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
6× · 2020–2025 · $58k · revenue +38%
OH
OSF HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
6× · 2019–2025 · $45k · revenue +38%

Funded once

CN
CRIS NURSERY
one grant, 2019 · $10k
KF
KCC FOUNDATION
one grant, 2019 · $10k
FC
FORTITUDE COMMUNITY OUTREACHgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +726%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Vermilion County Rape Crisis Center

Counsel and support of victims of rape and sexual assault

Health

Central Illinois Services

Provide affordable housing and other services to low & moderate income families

—

Casa of Vermilion County

To advocate for abused and neglected children with the juvenile court system of Vermilion County and Edgar County, IL by training and managing volunteers to represent those children

Crime & Legal

Vermilion County Child Advocacy Center

Perform forensic interviews on minor children in response to calls from either the Department of Children and Family Services or law enforcement, regarding potential abuse of the child. The Center works as an advocate for the child with…

Crime & Legal

Childrens Advocacy Center of

To assist children who have been victims of abuse

Crime & Legal

Central Illinois Foodbank Inc

Charitable food distribution.

Food & Nutrition

The Illinois State Historical Society

To provide funding and support services in relation to the research and development of historical information regarding the state of illinois history.

—

Illini Valley Association of

The association is a local advocate for a healthy business environment and a resource for its members to deliver ethical and professional services to the public

—

Vermilion County Farm Bureau

Promote and preserve agriculture activities for members

—

United Way of Illinois Valley

To improve the quality of life of all people by gathering and distribution, in an efficient and accountable manner, community resources which respond to priority health and human service needs.

Philanthropy

Illinois Valley Food Pantry

Providing food to needy families in the illinois valley area.

Food & Nutrition

Dupage County Area Project Inc

Uniting families within communities to resources, services and education that will provide a positive impact to their daily lives and further promote a healthy

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Danville Library Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Danville Birth Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/86

the rest of the field

146/1,629

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

70 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

68/70

Grantees still filing

47/70

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,142,187Health$105,750Philanthropy$98,333Community Improvement$90,000Arts & Culture$84,000Youth Development$83,825Human Services$65,575

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

John P Cadle FoundationIL48.5× affinity20 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John P Cadle Foundation · Vermilion Healthcare Foundation · Community Foundation of East Central · Raymond F Donovan Trust 1015010096 · Julius W Hegeler II Foundation · Mary Helen Roberts Trust · United Way of Champaign County · Freed Charitable Trust · Al Webster Foundation · Arthur and Gesena Griffin Trust · Balloons Over Vermilion Nfp · WGRC Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation IROQUOIS FEDERAL FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DANVILLE FOUNDATION FOR INDUSTRIAL GROWTH INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~17 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 370867044 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on DANVILLE FOUNDATION FOR INDUSTRIAL GROWTH INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 17 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 36% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Iroquois Federal Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Iroquois Federal Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

IROQUOIS FEDERAL FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

70 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Iroquois Federal Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

IROQUOIS FEDERAL FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

70 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Iroquois Federal Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph