How much did AL WEBSTER FOUNDATION grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 75% of AL WEBSTER FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$6,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.0M

Total assets

Largest grants

THE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION COUNTY$8,000
CRIS HEALTHY AGING$8,000
HOOPESTON MULTI AGENCY$7,500
UNITED WAY OF DANVILLE AREA$7,000
FAIR HOPE CHILDRENS MINISTRY$6,000
DANVILLE LIONS CLUB$5,000
SERVE TOGETHER$4,485
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANVILLE$4,000
GEORGETOWN HIGH SCHOOL$1,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$410k · 23 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against -72% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$410k

$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%

-72%

Still filing today

39%

11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

PhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CH
CRIS HEALTHY AGING
8× · 2018–2025 · $54k · revenue +56%
BA
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DANVILLE
9× · 2017–2025 · $44k · revenue +40%
UW
UNITED WAY OF DANVILLE AREA
4× · 2022–2025 · $27k · revenue +12%

Funded once

DF
DANVILLE FOUNDATION FOR INDUSTRIAL GROWTH
one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue -72%
TL
TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH
one grant, 2017 · $5k
WC
WOMEN'S CARE CENTER
one grant, 2018 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Vermilion County Child Advocacy Center

Perform forensic interviews on minor children in response to calls from either the Department of Children and Family Services or law enforcement, regarding potential abuse of the child. The Center works as an advocate for the child with…

Crime & Legal

Vermilion County Farm Bureau

Promote and preserve agriculture activities for members

—

United Way of Vermillion

Uniting people and resources to build a stronger community.

—

Vermillion Area Chamber of Commerce

To promote and develop economic growth for the city of vermillion, sd.

—

Danville Library Foundation

To benefit the community by raising, managing, and distributing funds to enhance the services and collections of the danville public library and to increase public awareness of the library's needs and services.

—

Calumet Area Industrial Commission

Voluntary association of industry and suppliers to industry, which exists to attract, develop and retain industry in the calumet region.

Employment

Danville Area Community Center

Provides a healthy environment for all where no one is denied membership or access to programs.

Recreation & Sports

Voluntary Action Center of Northern Illinois

Provide high quality services that address the basic transportation and nutrition needs of the communities served

Philanthropy

Illinois Valley Economic Development

Ivedc runs programs to assist low-income, disabled, elderly, and individuals and families in need.

Human Services

Decatur Area Convention & Visitors

To encourage, foster, promote and stimulate conventions and tourism in the decatur, illinois area.

—

Casa of Vermilion County

To advocate for abused and neglected children with the juvenile court system of Vermilion County and Edgar County, IL by training and managing volunteers to represent those children

Crime & Legal

Volunteer Center of Cedar Valley

To recruit volunteers.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Danville Area Inc and the most unlike its peers is Vermilion County Handicap Assoc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

10/10

Grantees still filing

6/10

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$338,555Philanthropy$57,664Human Services$21,740Health$14,660Arts & Culture$11,381Community Improvement$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Iroquois Federal Foundation IncIL20.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Iroquois Federal Foundation Inc · Vermilion Healthcare Foundation · John P Cadle Foundation · Community Foundation of East Central · United Way of Champaign County · United Way of Danville Area Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation AL WEBSTER FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DANVILLE FOUNDATION FOR INDUSTRIAL GROWTH.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~17 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 370867044 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on DANVILLE FOUNDATION FOR INDUSTRIAL GROWTH, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 17 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 6% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Al Webster Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Al Webster Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

AL WEBSTER FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Al Webster Foundation?

More from the funding graph

AL WEBSTER FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Al Webster Foundation?

More from the funding graph