Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Raymond F Donovan Trust 1015010096

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$95k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Health$146kFood & Nutrition$143kPublic Safety & Disaster$123kRecreation & Sports$76kArts & Culture$49kCrime & Legal$45kEducation$30kYouth Development$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUMMER IN THE PARK$8,000
DONOVAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL DIST #3$8,000
IROQUOIS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$8,000
SUGAR CREEK OPERA LTD$7,000
PRAIRIE DELL CHURCH$5,000
LABOLOGY$5,000
THE ARC OF IROQUOIS COUNTY$4,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIS CHURCH OF WATSEKA$4,000
PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICE$4,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$3,500
WATSEKA AREA FOOD PANTRY$3,000
CLIFTON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$3,000
VILLAGE OF WOODLAND POLICE DEPT$3,000
MARTINTON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$3,000
SHELDON AREA FOOD PANTRY OF THE$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE GARAGE IN GILMAN: $5k → 12%THE GARAGE IN GILMAN: $4k → 12%THE GARAGE IN GILMAN: $1k → 12%THE GARAGE IN GILMAN: $1k → 12%THE GARAGE IN GILMAN: $400 → 12%OPTIONS CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $3k → 12%OPTIONS CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$672k · 34 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

34 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
13

Total granted

$672k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+3%

Still filing today

29%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ARC OF IROQUOIS COUNTY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $105k · revenue +37%
  • PS
    PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $42k · revenue +33%
  • IM
    IROQUOIS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL & RESIDENT HOME
    3× · 2020–2025 · $28k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • DT
    DANFORTH TOWNSHIP COMMUNITY BLDG
    one grant, 2022 · $9k
  • IV
    ILLINOIS VETERANS OF DESERT WARS
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • IC
    IROQUOIS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
    one grant, 2024 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cass County Food Pantry

Provide food and grocery items to poor

Food & Nutrition
2
Cicero-Berwyn-Stickney Food Pantry

To collect and distribute food and other supplies at no cost to the needy in the Cicero-Berwyn-Stickney (Illinois) area.

Human Services
3
Hope House of Central Illinois Inc

Family grieving services

Health
4
Illinois Partners in Hope Nfp

Food pantry, we procure, warehouse, and distribute food/ goods to food pantries.

Food & Nutrition
5
Putnam County Food Pantry

To provide food and other grocery items to needy residents of Putnam County, Illinois, and to transients in need.

Food & Nutrition
6
Community Life Center of Rockford

To provide an enviornment promoting community socialization

7
Greater Itasca Food Pantry

Serve the residents of the itasca illinois community with food, personal hygiene products, and other household goods at no cost to the recipient. also provide one-time assistance to those not residing in itasca.

Education
8
Prairie Du Rocher Community Library

To provide Literary and Educational Resources to the people of Prairie Du Rocher and the surrounding area.

Education
9
Northern Il Helping Hands Food Pantry Nfp

To provide at least 2 days of food to needy families and people.

Food & Nutrition
10
DuQuoin Food Pantry

Provide food to needy people.

Human Services
11
North Scott Food Pantry

The North Scott Food Pantry provides food for people in need. Clients receive enough food for about one week and are allowed to get food every 28 days. There were 721 visits to our food pantry in 2025.

Food & Nutrition
12
Dominican Sisters Rosary Hill Home

Icf and long term care facility

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Iroquois Memorial Hospital & Resident Home and the most unlike its peers is Garage in Gilman. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 20. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number10%4%<5yr9%26%5–10yr31%26%10–20yr10%13%20–35yr12%17%35–55yr28%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value10%6%<5yr9%15%5–10yr31%26%10–20yr10%12%20–35yr12%11%35–55yr28%30%55yr+

The field is 10% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
6%
10/179

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE ARC OF IROQUOIS COUNTY — $105,100 · OtherTHE ARC OF IROQUOIS COUNTYIROQUOIS COUNT AGRICULTURAL & 4-H — $77,950 · OtherIROQUOIS COUNT AGRICULTURAL & 4-HMARTINTON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY — $68,500 · OtherMARTINTON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRYSUMMER IN THE PARK — $46,000 · OtherSUMMER IN THE PARKAMERICAN RED CROSS — $25,000 · Other+35 more — $195,809 · Other+35 moreSUGAR CREEK OPERA LTD — $42,000 · Arts & CulturePRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC — $41,500 · Crime & LegalCISSNA PARK AREA FOOD PANTRY — $27,000 · Food & NutritionCLIFTON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY — $14,000 · Food & NutritionIROQUOIS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL & RESIDENT HOME — $28,000 · HealthOSF Healthcare System — $8,000 · HealthMILFORD PARK & POOL FOUNDATION — $24,823 · Recreation & SportsGARAGE IN GILMAN — $11,507 · Human ServicesOptions Center for Independent Living — $5,000 · Human Services
Other$518,359Arts & Culture$42,000Crime & Legal$41,500Food & Nutrition$41,000Health$36,000Recreation & Sports$24,823Human Services$16,507

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE ARC OF IROQUOIS COUNTY — $105,100 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetSUGAR CREEK OPERA LTD — $42,000 over 5y, 67% of budgetPRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC — $41,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetIROQUOIS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL & RESIDENT HOME — $28,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCISSNA PARK AREA FOOD PANTRY — $27,000 over 5y, 23% of budgetMILFORD PARK & POOL FOUNDATION — $24,823 over 5y, 26% of budgetCLIFTON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY — $14,000 over 4y, 9.0% of budgetCROSSROADS YOUTH CENTER INC — $12,500 over 2y, 14% of budgetGARAGE IN GILMAN — $11,507 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetOSF Healthcare System — $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOptions Center for Independent Living — $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWOODY WILLIAMS FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ARC OF IROQUOIS COUNTY
  • Who funds SUGAR CREEK OPERA LTD
  • Who funds PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC
  • Who funds IROQUOIS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL & RESIDENT HOME
  • Who funds CISSNA PARK AREA FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds MILFORD PARK & POOL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CLIFTON COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds CROSSROADS YOUTH CENTER INC
  • Who funds GARAGE IN GILMAN
  • Who funds OSF Healthcare System
  • Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC
  • Who funds Options Center for Independent Living

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Iroquois Federal Foundation IncIL34.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Iroquois Federal Foundation Inc · Mary Helen Roberts Trust · Freed Charitable Trust · Arthur and Gesena Griffin Trust Yellow Cardinal Advisory Group · Paul & Norma Schaumburg Charitable · Miner Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Raymond F Donovan Trust 1015010096 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph