Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Vermilion Healthcare Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$635k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$287k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$1.8MHuman Services$525kEducation$280kArts & Culture$226kPublic Safety & Disaster$162kYouth Development$149kHousing & Shelter$119kCrime & Legal$117kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $208k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $131k
  • $250k+1 grant · $287k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OSF$287,420
OSF HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$70,766
DANVILLE CHRISTIAN ACADEMYHOPE UNLIMITED CHURCH$60,000
CRIS HEALTHY AGING$37,500
SCHLARMAN ACADEMY$35,000
UNITED WAY OF DANVILLE AREA$26,262
DANVILLE FAMILY YMCA$25,000
IT TAKES A VILLAGE$25,000
VERMILION COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$18,500
ROXY'S HOUSE$10,800
FAIR HOPE CHILDREN'S MINISTRY$10,000
IMMANUEL LUTHERAN SCHOOL$10,000
DANVILLE ART LEAGUE$10,000
RED MASK PLAYERS$4,593
THE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION COUNTY$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $163k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SERVE TOGETHER VERMILION COUNTY: $24k → 17%THE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION COUNTY: $11k → 17%THE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION COUNTY: $10k → 17%THE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION COUNTY: $7k → 17%SERVE TOGETHER VERMILION COUNTY: $5k → 17%THE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION COUNTY: $5k → 17%THE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION COUNTY: $4k → 17%THE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION COUNTY: $4k → 17%CORE RE-ENTRY INC: $30k → 17%CORE RE-ENTRY INC: $16k → 17%PROJECT SUCCESS OF VERMILION CO: $12k → 17%MUSTARD SEED CHRISTIAN DAYCARE: $25k → 17%MUSTARD SEED CHRISTIAN DAYCARE: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 20% of Vermilion Healthcare Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in IL; read by stated purpose it is 81% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Vermilion Healthcare Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.5M · 26 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

26 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
40

Total granted

$3.5M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+56%

Still filing today

73%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $133k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $266k · revenue +22%
  • C
    CROSSPOINT
    4× · 2019–2024 · $134k · revenue +38%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF DANVILLE AREA INC
    3× · 2019–2025 · $83k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $443k
  • O(
    OSF (FORMALLY PRESENCE USMC)
    one grant, 2018 · $162k
  • VC
    VERMILION COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH 708 BOARD
    one grant, 2018 · $70k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vermilion County Farm Bureau

Promote and preserve agriculture activities for members

2
Danville Neighborhood Development Corporation

Reimagine danville's neighborhoods as thriving, nuturing, safe places where residents are empowered to invest their time, energy, and resources to make a positive difference.

Community Improvement
3
Danville Area Community Center

Dacc is a non-profit, community-owned facility. the center provides a wholesome, healthy environment and pledges that no person will be denied membership or access to programs. the dacc provides for members of all ages, a wide variety of…

Recreation & Sports
4
Downtown Danville Inc

Promote the Downtown area of Danville IL

Community Improvement
5
Danville Regional Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Danville Chapter of the Va Museum of Fine Arts

To inspire community cohesiveness and facilitate impactful education through the advancement of art and history in the dan river region.

Arts & Culture
7
Vermilion Council On Aging Inc

To deliver services to the elderly of vermillion parish. we are the designated agency (in affiliation with regional & state agencies) for meal services,senior center, homemaker, transportation and similar services to the aging.

Human Services
8
Danville Public School Foundation Inc

The foundation's provides funds to promote enhanced educational opportunities for the students attending danville public schools.

Philanthropy
9
Danville Boyle Co Senior Citizens Inc

Support senior citizens in boyle county by providing a functioning senior center.

Human Services
10
Danevang Volunteer Fire Department

To provide for the safety and health of our communities and our visitors through professional emergency response, fire prevention and public education.

11
Vermilion County Rape Crisis Center

Counsel and support victims of rape and sexual assault

Health
12
Voluntary Action Center of Northern Illinois

Voluntary Action Center, which serves Bureau, Dekalb, Kendall, Lasalle and Putnam counties provides high quality services that address the basic transportation and nutrition needs of its communities.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Danville Library Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Vermilion County War Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%11%<5yr13%11%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr9%20%20–35yr12%20%35–55yr27%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%6%<5yr13%11%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr9%8%20–35yr12%19%35–55yr27%39%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
13%
44/334

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
22/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OSF — $1,920,370 · OtherOSFIndividual grant recipient — $443,302 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $266,461 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONSCHLARMAN ACADEMY OF DANVILLE INC — $171,406 · OtherOSF (FORMALLY PRESENCE USMC) — $162,230 · Other+51 more — $1,023,225 · Other+51 moreOSF Healthcare Foundation — $279,766 · HealthOSF Healt…CROSSPOINT — $134,266 · HealthCROSSPOIN…Core Reentry Inc — $46,000 · Human ServicesTHE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION COUNTY — $41,843 · Human ServicesMUSTARD SEED CHRISTIAN DAYCARE — $35,000 · Human ServicesSERVE TOGETHER VERMILLION COUNTY — $28,775 · Human ServicesPROJECT SUCCESS OF VERMILION COUNTY INC — $11,790 · Human ServicesVERMILION HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $55,238 · Arts & CultureVermilion County Museum Society — $47,576 · Arts & CultureVermilion County War Museum — $4,877 · Arts & CultureDANVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $3,950 · Arts & CultureUNITED WAY OF DANVILLE AREA INC — $82,773 · PhilanthropyFair Hope Ministry — $48,000 · Youth DevelopmentVERMILION COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER — $43,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$3,986,994Health$414,032Human Services$163,408Arts & Culture$111,641Philanthropy$82,773Youth Development$48,000Crime & Legal$43,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOSF Healthcare Foundation — $279,766 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $266,461 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetCROSSPOINT — $134,266 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF DANVILLE AREA INC — $82,773 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetVERMILION HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $55,238 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetOUTDOOR HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF VERMILION COUNTY ILLINOIS — $50,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetFair Hope Ministry — $48,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetVermilion County Museum Society — $47,576 over 4y, 8.5% of budgetCore Reentry Inc — $46,000 over 2y, 43% of budgetVERMILION COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER — $43,500 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetTHE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION COUNTY — $41,843 over 6y, 11% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DANVILLE — $39,307 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetMUSTARD SEED CHRISTIAN DAYCARE — $35,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetHOOPESTON MULTI AGENCY SERVICE — $34,769 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetSERVE TOGETHER VERMILLION COUNTY — $28,775 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetDanville Soccer Association — $28,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetDANVILLE FOUNDATION FOR INDUSTRIAL GROWTH — $28,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetWORKSOURCE ENTERPRISES — $26,670 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDANVILLE LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetMERCY HOUSING LAKEFRONT — $22,945 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPEER COURT INC — $22,200 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetDANVILLE AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $21,924 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DANVILLE ART LEAGUE — $20,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS — $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDANVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $3,950 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBALLOONS OVER VERMILION NFP — $3,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OSF Healthcare Foundation
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds CROSSPOINT
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF DANVILLE AREA INC
  • Who funds VERMILION HERITAGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds OUTDOOR HERITAGE FOUNDATION OF VERMILION COUNTY ILLINOIS
  • Who funds Fair Hope Ministry
  • Who funds Vermilion County Museum Society
  • Who funds Core Reentry Inc
  • Who funds VERMILION COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER
  • Who funds THE DWELLING PLACE OF VERMILION COUNTY
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DANVILLE
  • Who funds CRIS Healthy Aging
  • Who funds MUSTARD SEED CHRISTIAN DAYCARE
  • Who funds HOOPESTON MULTI AGENCY SERVICE
  • Who funds SERVE TOGETHER VERMILLION COUNTY
  • Who funds Danville Soccer Association
  • Who funds DANVILLE FOUNDATION FOR INDUSTRIAL GROWTH
  • Who funds WORKSOURCE ENTERPRISES
  • Who funds DANVILLE LIBRARY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MERCY HOUSING LAKEFRONT
  • Who funds PEER COURT INC
  • Who funds DANVILLE AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE DANVILLE ART LEAGUE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Iroquois Federal Foundation IncIL45.2× affinity19 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Iroquois Federal Foundation Inc · John P Cadle Foundation · Julius W Hegeler II Foundation · Balloons Over Vermilion Nfp · Al Webster Foundation · Community Foundation of East Central Illinois · United Way of Danville Area Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Vermilion Healthcare Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph