Skip to content

Illinois · Public charity

Interfaith Worker Justice

To advance the rights of workers by engaging diverse faith communities into action, from grassroots organizing to shaping policy at the local, state and national levels. They envision a nation where all workers enjoy the rights to: (continued on Schedule O)* Wages, health care, and pensions that allow workers to raise families and retire…

$165k
Granted FY2022
11
Grants FY2022
11
Organizations funded FY2022
36%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2022
$15,000
Largest grant, FY2022
$15,000
Organizations funded a year
6 to 11
FY2017 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
9
Total assets, FY2022
$58k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 36% of the organizations Interfaith Worker Justice funded were first-time grantees, receiving 36% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
EmploymentInternationalHuman ServicesEducationPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202211$165k36%
FY20216$503k50%
FY202010$100k40%
FY20198$100k13%
FY20187$81k14%
FY201711$173kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Employment$367kCivil Rights$266kCrime & Legal$164kEducation$140kInternational$65kHuman Services$40kCommunity Improvement$39kReligion$30kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
OH
NJ
CA
MO
MD
AR
NC
DC
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 22 grantees

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($30k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Interfaith Worker Justice supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe International Center for Labor Social and Spiritual Activism: $235,600 over 2y, 19% of budgetCenter for Worker Justice of Eastern Iowa: $115,600 over 3y, 18% of budgetGeorgetown University: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPilipino Workers Center of Southern: $75,690 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetThe Education & Training Institute Inc: $55,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetWestern North Carolina Workers Center: $52,500 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetGreater Minnesota Worker Center: $45,600 over 2y, 21% of budgetNorthwest Arkansas Workers Justice Center: $43,247 over 3y, 17% of budgetCincinnati Interfaith Workers Cente: $40,275 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetThird Sector New England Inc: $39,089 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFe y Justicia Worker Center: $37,965 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetDamayan Migrant Workers Association Inc: $37,343 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetImmigrant Solidarity Dupage: $34,780 over 3y, 17% of budgetRebirth Inc: $30,600 over 1y, 15% of budgetRural Community Workers Alliance: $30,600 over 1y, 14% of budgetTogether West Michigan Education Fund: $29,985 over 3y, 12% of budgetBrazos Interfaith Immigration Network: $25,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetWorker Justice Wisconsin: $22,420 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetVoces de la Frontera Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWorkers' Center of Central New York Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 20.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC19.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Abelard Foundation Inc · Oxfam-America Inc · Hispanics in Philanthropy · Food Chain Workers Alliance · Unitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc · National Employment Law Project · National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Interfaith Worker Justice with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Interfaith Worker Justice?

Find your warmest path to Interfaith Worker Justice through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Interfaith Worker Justice

How much does Interfaith Worker Justice give?
Interfaith Worker Justice reported 11 grants totaling $165,000 in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 11 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2022.
What does Interfaith Worker Justice fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2022, its largest causes are Employment (33%), Civil Rights (24%), Crime & Legal (15%).
Who are Interfaith Worker Justice's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2022: The International Center for Labor Social and Spiritual Activism ($236k), Center for Worker Justice of Eastern Iowa ($116k), Georgetown University ($100k).
Does Interfaith Worker Justice fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 36% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Interfaith Worker Justice?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc, The Abelard Foundation Inc, Oxfam-America Inc.
Where is Interfaith Worker Justice based?
Interfaith Worker Justice is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Interfaith Worker Justice’s filings →

More from the funding graph