Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Interfaith Worker Justice

To advance the rights of workers by engaging diverse faith communities into action, from grassroots organizing to shaping policy at the local, state and national levels.

$165k
Granted FY2022
11
Grants FY2022
9
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Employment$367kCivil Rights$266kCrime & Legal$164kEducation$140kInternational$65kHuman Services$40kCommunity Improvement$39kReligion$30kOther$0
02FY2022 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$15,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$58k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Pilipino Workers Center$15,000
Center for Worker Justice of Eastern Iowa$15,000
New Labor$15,000
Voces de la Frontera$15,000
Workers' Center of Central New York$15,000
Western North Carolina Workers' Center$15,000
Workers' Rights Center$15,000
Cincinnati Interfaith Worker Center$15,000
South Florida Interfaith Worker Justice$15,000
Fe Y Justicia$15,000
Damayan Migrant Worker Association$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Workers' Center of Central New York: $15k → 14%Voces de la Frontera: $15k → 17%Brazo Interfaith Immigrant Network: $10k → 22%Brazos Interfaith Immigration Network: $15k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
OH
NJ
CA
MO
MD
AR
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$890k · 15 repeat orgs$231k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2022, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
5

Total granted

$890k
$171k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+83%

Still filing today

87%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EmploymentEducationHuman ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PW
    PILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN
    5× · 2017–2022 · $76k · revenue +29%
  • TE
    THE EDUCATION & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC
    4× · 2017–2022 · $55k · revenue +65%
  • WN
    WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA WORKERS CENTER
    4× · 2017–2022 · $53k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +34%
  • RC
    RURAL COMMUNITY WORKERS ALLIANCEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $31k · revenue +48%
  • RI
    REBIRTH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $31k · revenue +105%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
2
Lynn Worker Center Inc

Provide know your rights traini

Human Services
3
Warehouse Workers Justice Center Inc

Warehouse Workers for Justice is a worker center fighting for stable, living-wage jobs in warehouses and distribution centers. We educate workers about labor rights, teach folks how to enforce their rights, organize in the workplace and…

Crime & Legal
4
Central Ohio Workers Center Inc

The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.

Civil Rights
5
Fair Work Center

We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…

Employment
6
Labors Training and Community Development Alliance

Providing education, training and advocacy regarding employee rights and benefits for all working people, to include their immigration status.

7
Center for Workers' Rights

The center for workers' rights strives to improve working conditions, reduce barriers to securing employment, and remedy workplace injustices for low wage workers in the greater sacramento area.

Employment
8
Fuerza Unida

Fuerza Unidas mission is to empower workers, particularly women workers of color, and their families to achieve social, economic and environmental justice through education, organizing and advocacy. A special part of Fuerza Unidas mission…

Employment
9
Metrowest Worker Center Inccasa Do Trabalhador/Casa Del Trabajador

Metrowest worker center is an immigrant worker-led organization that defends and expands the labor, civil and human rights of all workers.

Civil Rights
10
Centro De Trabajadores Unidos

Educate workers on their rights,develope leadership in the immigrant community, organize and support al workers as they fight for their rights in the workplace and for changing policies policies that increase standards for all workers.

Human Services
11
Arriba Las Vegas Worker Center

Facilitates efforts for immigrants and low income workers to raise up their collective voice and fight for equality, economic justice, social, and political inclusion.

Civil Rights
12
Tennessee Workers Alliance

The tennessee worker's alliance is establised primarily to further the common good and social welfare of the working citizens of the united states of america by engaging in research, education and communication efforts regarding policy…

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cincinnati Interfaith Workers Cente and the most unlike its peers is Georgetown University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LABOR SOCIAL AND SPIRITUAL ACTIVISM — $235,600 · OtherTHE INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LABOR SOCIAL AND …Center for Worker Justice of Eastern Iowa — $115,600 · OtherCenter for Worker Justice of Eastern IowaNorthwest Arkansas Workers Justice Center — $43,247 · OtherNorthwest Arkansas Workers Justice CenterTOGETHER WEST MICHIGAN EDUCATION FUND — $29,985 · OtherTOGETHER WEST MICHIGAN EDUCATION FUND+4 more — $40,000 · Other+4 moreGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSI…THE EDUCATION & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC — $55,000 · EducationTHE EDUCATION & TRA…CINCINNATI INTERFAITH WORKERS CENTE — $40,275 · EducationCINCINNATI INTERFAI…WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA WORKERS CENTER — $52,500 · EmploymentWESTERN NORTH C…GREATER MINNESOTA WORKER CENTER — $45,600 · EmploymentGREATER MINNESO…RURAL COMMUNITY WORKERS ALLIANCE — $30,600 · EmploymentRURAL COMMUNITY…WORKER JUSTICE WISCONSIN — $22,420 · EmploymentWORKER JUSTICE …PILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN — $75,690 · Community ImprovementPILIPINO WO…THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $39,089 · Community ImprovementTHIRD SECTO…FE Y JUSTICIA WORKER CENTER — $37,965 · Civil RightsDAMAYAN MIGRANT WORKERS ASSOCIATION INC — $37,343 · Civil RightsIMMIGRANT SOLIDARITY DUPAGE — $34,780 · InternationalREBIRTH INC — $30,600 · InternationalBRAZOS INTERFAITH IMMIGRATION NETWORK — $25,000 · Human ServicesWorkers' Center of Central New York Inc — $15,000 · Human ServicesVOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC — $15,000 · Human Services
Other$464,432Education$195,275Employment$151,120Community Improvement$114,779Civil Rights$75,308International$65,380Human Services$55,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LABOR SOCIAL AND SPIRITUAL ACTIVISM — $235,600 over 2y, 19% of budgetCenter for Worker Justice of Eastern Iowa — $115,600 over 3y, 18% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN — $75,690 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE EDUCATION & TRAINING INSTITUTE INC — $55,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetWESTERN NORTH CAROLINA WORKERS CENTER — $52,500 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetGREATER MINNESOTA WORKER CENTER — $45,600 over 2y, 21% of budgetNorthwest Arkansas Workers Justice Center — $43,247 over 3y, 17% of budgetCINCINNATI INTERFAITH WORKERS CENTE — $40,275 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $39,089 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFE Y JUSTICIA WORKER CENTER — $37,965 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetDAMAYAN MIGRANT WORKERS ASSOCIATION INC — $37,343 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetIMMIGRANT SOLIDARITY DUPAGE — $34,780 over 3y, 17% of budgetRURAL COMMUNITY WORKERS ALLIANCE — $30,600 over 1y, 14% of budgetREBIRTH INC — $30,600 over 1y, 15% of budgetTOGETHER WEST MICHIGAN EDUCATION FUND — $29,985 over 3y, 12% of budgetBRAZOS INTERFAITH IMMIGRATION NETWORK — $25,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetWORKER JUSTICE WISCONSIN — $22,420 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetWorkers' Center of Central New York Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetVOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC19.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Abelard Foundation Inc · Oxfam-America Inc · Hispanics in Philanthropy · Food Chain Workers Alliance · Unitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc · National Employment Law Project · National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Interfaith Worker Justice funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • The Education & Training Institute Inc19% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Coalition for Occupational Safety and Health Inc11% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Interfaith Worker Justice?

Find your warmest path to Interfaith Worker Justice through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph