Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Unitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc

UUSC advances human rights and social justice around the world, partnering with those who confront unjust power structures and mobilizing to challenge oppressive policies.

$3.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$106k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0173% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$1.0MCivil Rights$625kCommunity Improvement$409kInternational$325kReligion$266kHealth$201kEmployment$196kPublic Safety & Disaster$177kCrime & Legal$173kOther$1.9M
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 27 grants below total $866,640 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,229,501 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,362,861 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k21 grants · $449k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $418k
$25,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$45M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
First Parish in Malden$106,000
Faith in Democracy$88,640
Georgia Latino Alliance For Human Rights$60,000
United States Campaign for Burma$58,000
Lowlander Center Inc$55,000
School of the Americas Watch Educational Fund$50,000
UndocuBlack Network Inc$40,000
Unitarian Universalist Justice Ministry of North Carolina$39,000
Earthrights International Inc$30,000
Central American Resource Center$30,000
Asylum Pride House$30,000
Center for Transformative Action$30,000
Center for Disaster Philanthropy Inc$25,000
Peace Development Fund$25,000
Grassroots International$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $938k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Al Otro Lado Inc: $25k → 11%Central American Resource Center: $30k → 14%Foundation for the Austin Sanctuary Network: $20k → 10%UU Ministry for Earth: $25k → 12%Alaska Institute for Justice: $130k → 10%Latino Union: $25k → 14%Cooperation Jackson of Mississippi Inc: $20k → 23%CHIN Community of USA INC DC Area: $14k → 8%Central American Resources Center of California: $20k → 14%Foundation for the Austin Sanctuary Network: $20k → 10%UU Ministry for Earth: $10k → 12%Georgia Latino Alliance For Human Rights: $60k → 14%Alaska Institute for Justice: $57k → 10%CHIN Community of USA INC DC Area: $6k → 8%Al Otro Lado Inc: $6k → 11%Central American Resources Center of California: $15k → 14%Foundation for the Austin Sanctuary Network: $20k → 10%Georgia Latino Alliance For Human Rights: $15k → 14%Alaska Institute for Justice: $55k → 10%Central American Resources Center of California: $15k → 14%Foundation for the Austin Sanctuary Network: $20k → 10%Georgia Latino Alliance For Human Rights: $15k → 14%Alaska Institute for Justice: $44k → 10%Louisiana Appleseed: $20k → 23%Haitian Bridge Alliance: $20k → 11%Central American Resources Center of California: $15k → 14%Foundation for the Austin Sanctuary Network: $20k → 10%Georgia Latino Alliance For Human Rights: $15k → 14%Alaska Institute for Justice: $42k → 10%Central American Resources Center of California: $15k → 14%Foundation for the Austin Sanctuary Network: $15k → 10%Georgia Latino Alliance For Human Rights: $15k → 14%Alaska Institute for Justice: $25k → 10%Georgia Latino Alliance For Human Rights: $15k → 14%Alaska Institute for Justice: $25k → 10%Georgia Latino Alliance For Human Rights: $15k → 14%Georgia Latino Alliance For Human Rights: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
MD
AZ
NM
AR
NC
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $2.3M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$1.0M · 45% · 31 grants

Stated purpose: Humanitarian Assistance

Central America and the Caribbean$664k · 28% · 14 grants

Stated purpose: Humanitarian Assistance

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$429k · 18% · 15 grants

Stated purpose: Humanitarian Assistance

North America (Canada and Mexico)$199k · 9% · 5 grants

Stated purpose: Humanitarian Assistance

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.3M · 55 repeat orgs$901k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

55 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
30

Total granted

$4.3M
$477k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+33%

Still filing today

78%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $424k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsInternationalCrime & LegalReligionCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    Alaska Institute For Justice
    7× · 2017–2023 · $378k · revenue +60%
  • LC
    LOWLANDER CENTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $372k · revenue +181% · 31% of their budget
  • CF
    CENTER FOR TRANSFORMATIVE ACTION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $274k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • B
    BLUU
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • SE
    Skylight Engagement Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -58%
  • LS
    LONE STAR LEGAL AIDgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +43%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Justice Action Center

Justice Action Center JAC pilots an innovative model that advances the rights of immigrant communities by connecting cutting-edge impact litigation and compelling narrative and communications content. The purpose of JAC is to advance the…

Civil Rights
2
Detention Watch Network

Detention Watch Network seeks to end the cruel system of immigration detention via programs of grassroots organizing, strategic communications, and collective advocacy.

Human Services
3
Colectiva Legal Del Pueblo

Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.

Civil Rights
4
National Legal Advocacy Network Dba Glow

The National Legal Advocacy Network d/b/a Grassroots Law & Organizing for Workers is a legal non-profit organization dedicated to using legal strategies as a tool to build power for marginalized workers and create systemic change through…

Crime & Legal
5
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
6
Civil Liberties Defense Center

CIVIL LIBERTIES DEFENSE CENTER (CLDC) educates the general public about their rights and privileges under the US Constitution and provides free legal support to climate and social justice activists.

Civil Rights
7
Equal Justice Center

The Equal Justice Center is a non-profit law firm and employment justice organization which empowers low-income families, workers, and communities to achieve fair treatment in the workplace, in the justice system, and in our shared society…

Civil Rights
8
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
9
Asian Law Caucus

The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…

Crime & Legal
10
Jubilee Immigration Advocates

Our mission is to reflect Gods intent for humanity, to live as a reconciled and and restored community. We stand in solidarity with immigrants by providing high quality, affordable immigration legal services and advocating for just…

Human Services
11
The International Institute On Race Equality and Human Rights

The international institute on race, equality and human rights contributes to the promotion and defense of human rights, through training, technical assistance, advocacy, and strategic litigation conducted at the regional and international…

International
12
Alianza Americas

The mission of Alianza Americas is to bring about a more inclusive, equitable and sustainable way of life for Latino immigrant communities living in the United States and across the americas. By working transnationally with partners from…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Undocublack Network Inc and the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Immigrant Worker SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…Christian Missionary Organi…Community FoundationsLgbtq+ Community SupportPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%10%<5yr14%13%5–10yr19%39%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%5%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%8%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%34%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%6%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
5%
5/99
the rest of the field
13%
240,391/1,819,466

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
34
Early backer (in before they grew)
73/81
Grantees still filing
51/81
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CENTER FOR TRANSFORMATIVE ACTION — $274,000 · OtherCENTER FOR TRANSFORMATIVE ACTIONUNITED STATES CAMPAIGN FOR BURMA — $263,000 · OtherUNITED STATES CAMPAIGN FOR BURMAUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST ASSOCIATION — $123,128 · OtherFIRST CHURCH IN MALDEN HOMES INC — $106,000 · OtherGRASSROOTS LEADERSHIP INC — $95,625 · OtherUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST CHURCH OF TUCSON — $83,500 · OtherRURAL COMMUNITY WORKERS ALLIANCE — $115,000 · OtherWest Street Recovery — $137,457 · OtherWest Street RecoveryCRISTOSAL INC — $100,000 · Other+42 more — $1,186,390 · Other+42 moreAlaska Institute For Justice — $377,585 · Human ServicesAlaska Institute For …GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC — $165,000 · Human ServicesGEORGIA LATINO ALLIAN…FOUNDATION FOR THE AUSTIN SANCTUARY NETWORK — $115,000 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION FOR THE AU…Central American Resource Center - CARECEN - of California — $110,000 · Human ServicesCentral American Reso…ARAB AMERICAN CIVIC COUNCIL — $45,000 · Human ServicesUnitarian Universalist Ministry for Earth — $34,933 · Human Services+7 more — $165,656 · Human Services+7 moreUNDOCUBLACK NETWORK INC — $97,000 · Civil RightsUNDOCUBLACK N…Freedom for Immigrants — $84,500 · Civil RightsFreedom for I…Minnesota Unitarian Universalist Social Justice Alliance — $80,000 · Civil RightsMinnesota Uni…ACTIVATE LABS — $64,000 · Civil RightsACTIVATE LABSMUSLIM JUSTICE LEAGUE — $53,000 · Civil RightsMUSLIM JUSTIC…FE Y JUSTICIA WORKER CENTER — $50,000 · Civil RightsFE Y JUSTICIA…CENTER FOR LABOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC — $48,500 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR LA…REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $43,000 · Civil RightsREFUGEE & IMM…EARTHRIGHTS INTERNATIONAL INC — $30,000 · Civil RightsSkylight Engagement Inc — $25,000 · Civil RightsFlorida Immigrant Coalition Inc — $25,000 · Civil Rights+2 more — $25,000 · Civil RightsLOWLANDER CENTER — $372,050 · Community ImprovementCOALITION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS — $22,000 · Community Improvement+2 more — $15,250 · Community ImprovementGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC — $90,000 · InternationalFortify Inc — $70,000 · InternationalCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC — $40,000 · InternationalCONVERSATIONS WITH FRIENDS — $25,000 · InternationalPeace Development Fund — $25,000 · InternationalBORDERLINKS — $20,000 · InternationalINSTITUTE JUSTICE AND DEMOCRACY IN HAITI INC — $20,000 · InternationalPANORAMA GLOBAL — $20,000 · International+2 more — $15,000 · InternationalUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST JUSTICE ARIZONA NETWORK — $100,780 · ReligionFAITH IN DEMOCRACY — $88,640 · ReligionUnitarian Universalist Justice Ministry of North Carolina — $39,000 · ReligionUnitarian Universalist Massachusetts Action Network Inc — $22,500 · ReligionCENTER FOR ETHICAL LIVING AND SOCIAL JUSTICE — $15,000 · ReligionTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC — $96,580 · HealthLiving Hope Wheelchair Association — $72,500 · HealthPaso del Norte Community Foundation — $32,000 · Health
Other$2,484,100Human Services$1,013,174Civil Rights$625,000Community Improvement$409,300International$325,000Religion$265,920Health$201,080

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAlaska Institute For Justice — $377,585 over 7y, 8.9% of budgetLOWLANDER CENTER — $372,050 over 8y, 31% of budgetCENTER FOR TRANSFORMATIVE ACTION — $274,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetGEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC — $165,000 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetWest Street Recovery — $137,457 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetRURAL COMMUNITY WORKERS ALLIANCE — $115,000 over 8y, 22% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE AUSTIN SANCTUARY NETWORK — $115,000 over 6y, 65% of budgetCentral American Resource Center - CARECEN - of California — $110,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST JUSTICE ARIZONA NETWORK — $100,780 over 6y, 15% of budgetCRISTOSAL INC — $100,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetUNDOCUBLACK NETWORK INC — $97,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC — $96,580 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetGRASSROOTS LEADERSHIP INC — $95,625 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC — $90,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFAITH IN DEMOCRACY — $88,640 over 1y, 51% of budgetFreedom for Immigrants — $84,500 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetMinnesota Unitarian Universalist Social Justice Alliance — $80,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetLiving Hope Wheelchair Association — $72,500 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetFortify Inc — $70,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetACTIVATE LABS — $64,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetGREATER MINNESOTA WORKER CENTER — $61,460 over 3y, 16% of budgetNEW STORIES — $60,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetCENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMUSLIM JUSTICE LEAGUE — $53,000 over 3y, 9.6% of budgetSchool of the Americas Watch Ed Fnd — $50,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetFE Y JUSTICIA WORKER CENTER — $50,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetCENTER FOR LABOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCH INC — $48,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC — $48,420 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBLACK BELT JUSTICE CENTER — $47,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetJUSTICE IN MOTION INC — $45,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetARAB AMERICAN CIVIC COUNCIL — $45,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetCARRIZO COMECRUDO NATION OF TEXAS INC — $44,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $43,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNew York University — $42,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES AND FRIENDS OF LOUISIANAS INCARCERATED CHILDREN — $38,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMake the Road New York — $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUnitarian Universalist Ministry for Earth — $34,933 over 2y, 21% of budgetPaso del Norte Community Foundation — $32,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAL OTRO LADO — $31,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF CALIFORNIA — $31,000 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetEDGE FUNDERS ALLIANCE — $30,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetNorthwest Arkansas Workers Justice Center — $30,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetLOUISIANA ADVOCATES FOR IMMIGRANTS IN DETENTION — $30,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetIMMIGRANT ACTION ALLIANCE INC — $30,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetTHE GIVING BACK FUND — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONVERSATIONS WITH FRIENDS — $25,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetSkylight Engagement Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitabl…Proteus Fund IncTides FoundationRsf Social Finance IncTides CenterBorealis PhilanthropyRockefeller Philanthr…Hispanics in Philanth…NEO Philanthropy IncImmigrant Legal Resou…The Ford FoundationFwdus Education Fund …
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC37.6× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Proteus Fund Inc · Tides Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Tides Center · Borealis Philanthropy · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Hispanics in Philanthropy · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Immigrant Legal Resource Center · The Ford Foundation · Fwdus Education Fund Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Unitarian Universalist Service Committee Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    10get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 99 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines