Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Inmaat Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
117
Grants FY2024still arriving
19
States reached
$350k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

International$4.0MArts & Culture$2.8MCivil Rights$2.5MEducation$500kCrime & Legal$430kYouth Development$390kPhilanthropy$379kHealth$305kOther$0
02FY2024 · 117 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k103 grants · $1.6M
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $565k
  • $250k+1 grant · $350k
$15,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$45M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EQUALITY NOW INC$350,000
POLARIS PROJECT$100,000
INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY ASSOCIATION$100,000
CINEMA TROPICAL$100,000
VITALS VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP$75,000
SKATEISTAN USA$75,000
WITNESS INC$65,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
SISTERHOOD IS GLOBAL INSTITUTE$40,000
TIDES CENTER$35,000
SHE'S THE FIRST$35,000
SISTERHOOD IS GLOBAL INSTITUTE$35,000
INDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND$30,894
ROOM TO READ$30,000
TIDES CENTER$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $535k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%A BREEZE OF HOPE FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%SHE'S THE FIRST: $35k → 17%TRUCKERS EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE RESPONDERS: $10k → 11%THE SMILE TRUST: $20k → 15%HEALING HANDS OF JOY: $5k → 10%A BREEZE OF HOPE FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%SHE'S THE FIRST: $25k → 17%HEALING HANDS OF JOY: $5k → 10%A BREEZE OF HOPE FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%FAMILY VALUES WORK A MULTI-STATE CONSORTIUM: $15k → 17%A BREEZE OF HOPE FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%SHE'S THE FIRST INC: $25k → 17%A BREEZE OF HOPE FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%SHE'S THE FIRST: $25k → 17%NOT FOR SALE FUND: $5k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $25k → 10%SHE'S THE FIRST: $10k → 17%TIDES CENTER: $25k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $20k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $15k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $10k → 10%SHE'S THE FIRST: $5k → 17%SHE'S THE FIRST INC: $5k → 17%YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $25k → 10%ADAPTIVE DESIGN ASSOCIATION INC: $10k → 17%TIDES CENTER: $35k → 17%TIDES CENTER: $25k → 17%TIDES CENTER: $25k → 17%TIDES CENTER: $25k → 17%TIDES CENTER: $5k → 17%TIDES CENTER: $5k → 17%TIDES CENTER: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
IL
WI
NY
MA
WY
PA
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 73 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

73 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

73
43

Total granted

$11M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+5%

Still filing today

92%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $320k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesHealthEducationCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +66%
  • EN
    Equality Now Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +112%
  • WM
    WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $940k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $140k
  • SI
    SISTERHOOD IS GLOBAL INSTITUTE (DONOR DIRECT ACTION)
    one grant, 2022 · $130k
  • SCRIBE VIDEO CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Conversationalist
—
2
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
3
Breaking Through the Lens

Advocate for gender equality in the film industry.

Arts & Culture
4
Ripple Effect Images

Ripple effect images' mission is to raise awareness and funding by harnessing the power of visual storytelling to help scale solutions for women and children globally.

International
5
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
6
World Pulse Voices

World Pulse is a global social impact network connecting women from 227 countries to accelerate social change. We provide a safe and supportive online space where women can speak for themselves, make powerful connections, and access the…

Human Services
7
Women Deliver Inc

Women deliver is a global feminist advocacy organization with a clear mission: to ensure that every self-identifying girl and woman has control over her body and life. see organization's full mission statement in schedule o.

Education
8
Stichting Womens Initiatives for Gender Justice

Ending impunity for conflict related sexual violence

International
9
Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media

Transforming global storytelling by using data-driven research, education, and advocacy to mitigate bias, inspiring authentic portrayals in entertainment, advertising, and gaming that reflect the true diversity of the population.

Civil Rights
10
UltraViolet Education Fund

Ultraviolet education fund (uvef) is a 501c3 organization. ultraviolet is the premier national organization advocating for gender justice issues using creative, strategic campaigning and digital-first organizing. ultraviolet drives…

Civil Rights
11
Center for International Policy Inc

The center for international policy is a woman-led, progressive, independent nonprofit center for research, education, and advocacy working to advance a more peaceful, just, and sustainable u.s. approach to foreign policy. through…

International
12
Guernica Centre for InternationalJustice

The Guernica Centre for International Justice represents the interests of victims in national and international legal proceedings, putting in place transnational accountability strategies that seek to maximize the protection of victims'…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is She's the First Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Righteous Babe Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsCommunity Arts CentersYouth Sports ProgramsChristian Missionary Organi…Pregnancy Support ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportJewish Community Organizati…Developmental Disabilities …Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Environmental Conservation …Domestic Violence ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%38%10–20yr16%35%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%52%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%2%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/114
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,451

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

113 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 113 of the 142 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
113/113
Grantees still filing
64/113
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC — $2,025,000 · InternationalVITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INCEquality Now Inc — $1,700,000 · InternationalEquality Now IncPOLARIS PROJECT — $375,000 · InternationalPOLARIS PROJECTWITNESS INC — $365,000 · InternationalWITNESS INCSISTERHOOD IS GLOBAL INSTITUTE INC — $355,000 · InternationalSISTERHOOD IS GLOBAL INSTITUTE INCSKATEISTAN — $225,000 · International+16 more — $850,488 · International+16 moreWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC — $940,200 · Arts & CultureWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INCINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC — $301,000 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENT…CINEMA TROPICAL INC — $250,000 · Arts & CultureCINEMA TROPICAL INCWALKING IRIS MEDIA — $152,500 · Arts & CultureWALKING IRIS MEDIATHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC — $112,500 · Arts & CultureTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC — $105,000 · Arts & Culture+23 more — $592,000 · Arts & Culture+23 moreIndividual grant recipient — $245,000 · OtherIndividual grant re…Individual grant recipient — $140,000 · OtherIndividual grant re…SISTERHOOD IS GLOBAL INSTITUTE (DONOR DIRECT ACTION) — $130,000 · OtherSISTERHOOD IS GLOBA…SCRIBE VIDEO CENTER INC — $100,000 · OtherDOC SOCIETY INC — $87,500 · OtherFREEDOM FOR ALL INC — $83,500 · OtherNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $105,000 · OtherCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $100,000 · Other+47 more — $1,128,536 · Other+47 moreROOM TO READ — $330,000 · EducationWOMEN'S EDUCATION PROJECT — $85,000 · EducationKAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE — $80,000 · EducationAFRICAN LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION — $30,000 · EducationPOPULATION MEDIA CENTER INC — $30,000 · Education+3 more — $32,500 · EducationTIDES CENTER — $220,000 · Human ServicesSHE'S THE FIRST INC — $130,000 · Human ServicesA BREEZE OF HOPE FOUNDATION — $90,000 · Human ServicesSISTERSONG INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER — $25,000 · Human ServicesTHE SMILE TRUST — $20,000 · Human Services+5 more — $50,000 · Human ServicesTrust Women Foundation Inc — $85,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $60,000 · HealthPOPULATION ACTION INTERNATIONAL — $60,000 · HealthGLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR HUMANITY — $45,000 · HealthWORLDWIDE FISTULA FUND — $45,000 · HealthRape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN) — $45,000 · HealthThe Fistula Foundation — $30,000 · Health+3 more — $25,000 · HealthTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $105,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $100,000 · Civil RightsSkylight Engagement Inc — $35,000 · Civil RightsThe Representation Project — $25,000 · Civil RightsPEACE IS LOUD INC — $25,000 · Civil Rights+2 more — $12,500 · Civil Rights
International$5,895,488Arts & Culture$2,453,200Other$2,119,536Education$587,500Human Services$565,000Health$395,000Civil Rights$302,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC — $2,025,000 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetEquality Now Inc — $1,700,000 over 5y, 6.2% of budgetWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC — $940,200 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetPOLARIS PROJECT — $375,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetWITNESS INC — $365,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetSISTERHOOD IS GLOBAL INSTITUTE INC — $355,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetROOM TO READ — $330,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC — $301,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCINEMA TROPICAL INC — $250,000 over 3y, 37% of budgetSKATEISTAN — $225,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $220,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWALKING IRIS MEDIA — $152,500 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetSHE'S THE FIRST INC — $130,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetCoalition Against Trafficking In Women — $125,000 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL — $115,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC — $112,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPRINCIPE PRODUCTIONS INC — $110,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $105,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $105,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC — $105,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSCRIBE VIDEO CENTER INC — $100,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAMFED USA FOUNDATION — $90,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetA BREEZE OF HOPE FOUNDATION — $90,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetDOC SOCIETY INC — $87,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTrust Women Foundation Inc — $85,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $85,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S EDUCATION PROJECT — $85,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetFREEDOM FOR ALL INC — $83,500 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetUTAH FILM CENTER — $81,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetKAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE — $80,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetAdvancing Real Change Inc — $65,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetSozo Impact Inc — $65,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetINDIA DEVELOPMENT AND RELIEF FUND INC — $62,988 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPOPULATION ACTION INTERNATIONAL — $60,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetFILM INDEPENDENT — $55,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCONTEXTOS NFP — $47,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetVIDEO VERACITY INC — $46,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetGLOBAL FOUNDATION FOR HUMANITY — $45,000 over 5y, 24% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF LEGAL SERVICE INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLDWIDE FISTULA FUND — $45,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetRape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN) — $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetShadhika Project — $42,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetNOVA UKRAINE — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ford FoundationNovo FoundationTides FoundationChicken & Egg Films I…Perspective Media Ini…The San Francisco Fou…Harnisch Family Found…Proteus Fund IncSilicon Valley Commun…Rockefeller Philanthr…Skoll FundJohn D and Catherine …
The Ford FoundationNY38.1× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ford Foundation · Novo Foundation · Tides Foundation · Chicken & Egg Films Inc · Perspective Media Initiatives Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · Harnisch Family Foundation · Proteus Fund Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Skoll Fund · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Inmaat Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Peace and Justice Center — 41% of income from government
  • Advancing Real Change Inc — 12% of income from government
  • The Center for Independent Documentary Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 142 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines