· Public charity
Chicken & Egg Films Inc
Chicken & egg films champions women and gender-expansive documentary filmmakers around the globe with funding, mentorship, and access so they can tell stories that ignite change.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k11 grants · $260k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $805k
- $250k+1 grant · $285k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WALKING IRIS MEDIA | $285,000 |
| WOMEN MAKE MOVIES | $180,000 |
| VIDEO VERACITY INC | $150,000 |
| WOMEN MAKE MOVIES | $90,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY ASSOCIATION | $80,000 |
| WALKING IRIS MEDIA | $80,000 |
| AFTERIMAGE PUBLIC MEDIA | $75,000 |
| DOC SOCIETY | $50,000 |
| REDFORD CENTER INC | $50,000 |
| CINEMA TROPICAL | $50,000 |
| VIDEO VERACITY INC | $40,000 |
| FILM INDEPENDENT INC | $40,000 |
| LEVEL GROUND INC | $30,000 |
| UTAH FILM CENTER | $30,000 |
| LIFE MEDIA PROJECTS INC | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +102% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $155k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WMWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC8× · 2017–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +82%
- WIWALKING IRIS MEDIA7× · 2018–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +664% · 31% of their budget
- UIUNIONDOCS INC8× · 2017–2024 · $543k · revenue +253%
Funded once
- JBJACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INCone grant, 2019 · $70k · revenue -11%
- ADAMERICAN DOCUMENTARY INCone grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue -29%
- RTRUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2018 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Advocate for gender equality in the film industry.
Recognizing the power of film to inspire, Working Films positions documentaries to increase civic engagement and shift culture at the local, state, and national level.
Field of Vision is a filmmaker and artist driven organization that commissions, creates and supports original nonfiction films about developing and ongoing stories around the globe. Field of Vision supports work that uses innovative and…
Dc dox is a major international film festival in the nation's capital dedicated to promoting documentary film as a leading art form, championing new voices and innovations in non-fiction storytelling, and using film as a catalyst to engage…
Film forum's mission is two-fold: 1) to serve the general public by presenting the highest caliber of work to the widest possible audience - encouraging the appreciation of new, challenging films (both american and foreign films), and…
SFFILM is a nonprofit organization whose mission ensures independent voices in film are welcomed, heard, and given the resources to thrive. SFFILM connects and inspires audiences, students and teachers, and filmmakers through our film…
The DC Independent Film Festival (DCIFF) showcases and supports local and international filmmakers and their work across the genres of fiction, animation, experimental and documentary through screening, discussion, professional…
The california film institute celebrates film and videos as art and education. its goal is to present and support emerging and established independent filmakers whose works address issues relevant to contemporary society. this is…
Cine enriches the quality of life in Athens, GA and the surrounding region by presenting film and arts that inspire, educate and sustainably build community.
Filmmakers Collaborative is a non-profit media organization with a mission to catalyze positive change though the power of filmmaking. Significant activities to support our mission in 2024 were the screenings and fundraising for the For Us…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Filmmakers Collaborative Inc and the most unlike its peers is Musicians Accordinc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC ↗
- Who funds WALKING IRIS MEDIA ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIONDOCS INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC ↗
- Who funds VIDEO VERACITY INC ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENT FEATURE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds FILM INDEPENDENT ↗
- Who funds DOC SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds The Alliance For Media Arts Culture Inc ↗
- Who funds UTAH FILM CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds CINEMA TROPICAL INC ↗
- Who funds VISUAL COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA ↗
- Who funds REDFORD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FIRELIGHT MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN DOCUMENTARY FUND ↗
- Who funds AFTERIMAGE PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
- Who funds JACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds KARTEMQUIN EDUCATIONAL FILMS ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN DOCUMENTARY INC ↗
- Who funds CAMERA NEWS INC ↗
- Who funds MUSICIANS ACCORDINC ↗
- Who funds CREATIVE KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds Just Vision Inc ↗
- Who funds DOCS IN PROGRESS INC ↗
- Who funds INTERFAZE EDUCATIONAL PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds FILMSCENE ↗
- Who funds LIFE MEDIA PROJECTS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ORLEANS VIDEO ACCESS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BIG SKY FILM INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENT PRODUCTION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds LEVEL GROUND ↗
- Who funds Mu Films ↗
- Who funds GISA INC ↗
- Who funds MAYSLES INSTITUTE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Perspective Media Initiatives Inc · The Ford Foundation · Catapult Film Fund · Academy Foundation · Inmaat Foundation · Jonathan Logan Family Foundation · Sundance Institute · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Harnisch Family Foundation · Cinereach Ltd · William F Harnisch Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Chicken & Egg Films Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- United Way Miami Inc — 23% of income from government
- The Center for Independent Documentary Inc — 6% of income from government
- The Filmmakers Collaborative Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Chicken & Egg Films Inc?
Find your warmest path to Chicken & Egg Films Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.