· Private foundation
Infotrust Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k18 grants · $52k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $67k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HEARTWORKS INC | $50,000 |
| THE FOUNDATION FOR LIFESPAN RESEARCH | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,960 |
| THE NEXT STEP FUND | $11,350 |
| HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| SHARED HARVEST | $9,957 |
| CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | $6,639 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER CINCINNATI | $6,074 |
| HUMANS FOR EDUCATION | $5,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| ROOM TO READ | $3,400 |
| HAMILTON COUNTY DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES SERVICES | $2,845 |
| CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS | $2,762 |
| THE BAOBAB HOME | $2,340 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
33 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $129k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HIHEARTWORKS INC3× · 2023–2025 · $240k · revenue +45%
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2025 · $20k · revenue +3%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER CINCINNATI2× · 2024–2025 · $16k · revenue +16%
Funded once
- CCintrifuseone grant, 2020 · $40k · revenue +22%
- ECEVERY CURE INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue ×172
- UWUnited Way of Greater Cincinnatione grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -34%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…
Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…
Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.
We save children's lives by transforming pediatric heart care in underserved parts of the world.
To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.
Provide services in response to individual need
Handicap international dba humanity & inclusion (hi) works with people with disabilities and people living in situations of vulnerability, including poverty, exclusion, conflict, and disaster.
The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.
Ronald mcdonald house charities of greater cincinnati offers a community of compassion, support and the comforts of home to families with critically ill children, steps away from the medical care they need.
One child global's mission is to advocate for children in hard places and provide holistic care so they have hope and thrive. onechild global's 355 hope centers provide holistic child development progress in nineteen countries.
To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…
To enhance the health and well-being of others through our work with blood and stem cell products and by facilitating scientific research
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evidence Action and the most unlike its peers is Sons of Valor Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 16% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 145 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HEARTWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD YOUTH HORIZONS INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR LIFESPAN RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds Cintrifuse ↗
- Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
- Who funds HUMANS FOR EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds TRI-STATE BLEEDING DISORDER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EVERY CURE INC ↗
- Who funds United Way of Greater Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds Haiti Mama Inc ↗
- Who funds GRAIN OF RICE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEXT STEP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds BLACK GIRLS CODE INC ↗
- Who funds SHARED HARVEST FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds EVERLASTING HOPE CHILDHOOD CANCER MISSION ↗
- Who funds INTERMOUNTAIN CENTERS FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds IMAGO GLOBAL GRASSROOTS ↗
- Who funds CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Josephine S Russell Charitable · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Children's Hospital Medical Center · Pfau Charitable Foundation · Millstone Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Betagole Family Foundation Inc % Robert Betagole · Tql Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Infotrust Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
- The Next Step Fund Inc — 10% of income from government
- Franklin Food Pantry Inc — 3% of income from government
- The Dougy Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.