· Private foundation
Betagole Family Foundation Inc % Robert Betagole
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k95 grants · $87k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $123k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $94k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF CINCINNATI | $93,600 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER CINCINNATI | $32,500 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $30,000 |
| CINCINNATI PARKS FOUNDATION | $15,500 |
| JEWISH NATIONAL FUND | $15,360 |
| ISAAC M WISE TEMPLE | $10,050 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE | $10,000 |
| CINCINNATI ZOO AND BOTANICAL GARDEN | $10,000 |
| GRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL | $7,500 |
| OHIO ALLEYCAT RESCUE | $6,250 |
| SANTA MONICA EDUCATION CENTER | $5,000 |
| THE IMMIGRATION PROJECT | $3,750 |
| MARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES | $3,750 |
| CHILDRENS RELIEF FUND | $3,750 |
| TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL | $3,375 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $123k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
114 repeat relationships — 78 still active in FY2025, 36 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches9× · 2017–2025 · $94k · revenue +46%
- ZSZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +41%
- CPCincinnati Parks Foundation9× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- SMStanley M Klein Foundation Incgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +57% · 30% of their budget
- SMSanta Monica Education Foundationone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +11%
- SSHAREWELLone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -45%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION
Joint Commission evaluates and accredits health care organizations and programs across the United States to ensure compliance with rigorous standards of quality and safety, including the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)…
Make Jewish life vibrant, accessible and secure in Columbus, Israel and around the world.
The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.
As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.
Acrp promotes excellence in clinical research. we support clinical research professionals through training and development, the exchange of ideas and expertise, and certification. we serve as the preferred source for quality tools,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Stanley M Klein Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
116 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 116 of the 205 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Jewish Federation of Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds United Way of Greater Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Parks Foundation ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR RESEARCH ON SCHIZOPHRENIA AND DEPRESSION ↗
- Who funds GRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds MARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Stanley M Klein Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds The Center for Holocaust and Humanity Education ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds Jewish Community Center Of Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Santa Monica Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds SHAREWELL ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds SHARED HARVEST FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF CINCINNATI INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds ANGELS WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA STUDIO THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRATION PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Cincinnati Institute of Fine Arts ↗
- Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Sutphin Family Foundation Ica · Marge & Charles J Schott Foundation · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · The Northern Cincinnai Foundation · The Wohlgemuth Herschede Foundation Co Fifth Third Bank Na Agent · Millstone Fund · United Way of Greater Cincinnati · Ge Aerospace Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Betagole Family Foundation Inc % Robert Betagole funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mote Marine Laboratory Inc — 4% of income from government
- Resilient Retreat Inc — 0% of income from government
- Florida Studio Theatre Inc — 0% of income from government
- Tidewell Hospice Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.