Skip to content

· Public charity

INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak

Give Pikes Peak builds community philanthropy in the Pikes Peak Region by providing regional nonprofits with shared fundraising infrastructure, visibility, training, and donor incentives to increase donor engagement and organizational capacity.

$867k
Granted FY2026still arriving
52
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Animals$1.2MArts & Culture$1.1MHuman Services$1.1MHealth$887kEnvironment$759kCivil Rights$525kRecreation & Sports$389kEducation$325kOther$0
02FY2026 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 52 grants below total $807,638, the rows itemized in this filing. The $866,698 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $59,060 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k18 grants · $124k
  • $10k–50k33 grants · $631k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$12,937
Median grant
1
States reached
$14k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Happy Cats Haven$53,124
New Horizons Band of CS$36,176
Mission Medical Center$33,465
Harleys Hope Foundation$33,325
All Breed Rescue & Training$32,340
Manitou Art Center$30,754
Rocky Mtn Field Institute$28,655
Fostering Hope$26,629
Look what the Cat Brought In$24,129
TESSA$22,993
Westside CARES$22,529
Paws N Hooves Rescue$21,700
Sues Gift$21,205
Youth Documentary Academy$21,013
Mustang Ambassador Program$20,097
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–26, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Teller Senior Coalition: $11k → 8%Teller Senior Coalition: $10k → 8%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $14k → 9%Porchlight Friends: $12k → 9%PORCHLIGHT FRIENDS: $11k → 9%Porchlight Friends: $10k → 9%ONE NATION WALKING TOGETHER: $90k → 9%ONE NATION WALKING TOGETHER: $68k → 9%ONE NATION WALKING TOGETHER: $57k → 9%CATAMOUNT INSTITUTE: $26k → 9%CATAMOUNT INSTITUTE: $20k → 9%CATAMOUNT INSTITUTE: $18k → 9%CATAMOUNT INSTITUTE: $15k → 9%CATAMOUNT INSTITUTE: $13k → 9%Safe Place for Pets: $20k → 9%Safe Place for Pets: $17k → 9%OUR HOUSE: $11k → 9%FAMILY PROMISE OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $11k → 9%TESSA: $44k → 9%TESSA: $36k → 9%TESSA: $35k → 9%TESSA: $24k → 9%TESSA: $24k → 9%TESSA: $23k → 9%TESSA: $21k → 9%TRI-LAKES CARES: $36k → 9%TRI-LAKES CARES: $24k → 9%TRI-LAKES CARES: $20k → 9%TRI-LAKES CARES: $13k → 9%Our House Inc: $10k → 9%FOSTERING HOPE: $49k → 9%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $41k → 9%URBAN PEAK COLORADO SPRINGS: $37k → 9%THE PLACE: $37k → 9%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $37k → 9%Fostering Hope: $27k → 9%THE PLACE: $24k → 9%FAMILY PROMISE OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $23k → 9%FOSTERING HOPE: $22k → 9%THE PLACE: $19k → 9%THE PLACE: $19k → 9%SAFE PLACE FOR PETS: $19k → 9%SAFE PLACE FOR PETS: $18k → 9%FOSTERING HOPE: $14k → 9%Court Care for the PP Region: $10k → 9%FAMILY PROMISE OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $10k → 9%EARLY CONNECTIONS LEARNING CENTER: $10k → 9%Court Care for the PP Region: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.1M · 109 repeat orgs$331k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

109 repeat relationships: 49 still active in FY2026, 60 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

109
37

Total granted

$8.1M
$310k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+29%

Still filing today

91%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthAnimalsEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RM
    Rocky Mountain Field Institute Inc
    8× · 2019–2026 · $399k · revenue +7%
  • HC
    HAPPY CATS HAVEN INC
    8× · 2019–2026 · $345k · revenue +81%
  • TA
    Trails and Open Space Coalition
    8× · 2019–2026 · $290k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • CC
    CONCRETE COUCH
    one grant, 2020 · $21k · revenue +17%
  • SC
    SAVE CHEYENNE
    one grant, 2019 · $19k
  • MI
    MAKE IT A HOME
    one grant, 2023 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Artists in Recovery

Colorado Artists in Recovery utilizes recovery-oriented principles to provide a safe, encouraging, and inclusive environment for people affected by substance use and mental health. Through our workshops and events we nurture their creative…

Arts & Culture
2
The Colorado Parks Foundation Inc
Recreation & Sports
3
Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation

The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.

Health
4
Center for Nonprofit Excellence

The Center for Nonprofit Excellence strengthens Southern Colorado's nonprofit sector through leadership and resource development, advocacy and collaboration. Together, with our partners, we are co-creating a vibrant community in the Pikes…

—
5
Colorado Parks and Recreation Association

The Colorado Parks and Recreation Association is a non-profit education and advocacy organization whose members are dedicated to maintaining and improving our quality of life through parks, recreation and leisure opportunities.

Environment
6
Colorado Veterans Resource Coalition
Health
7
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
8
Step Springs

Step Springs is a subsidiary organization of Step Denver and when it opens in 2025 will be the first replication of the Step program. Step is a residential recovery community that gives men with nowhere else to turn the opportunity to…

Housing & Shelter
9
Humane Society of the Pikes Peak Region

To offer compassionate care to animals, support safe communities, and provide socially conscious sheltering. (continued on schedule o)

Animals
10
Pueblo Rape Crisis Services Inc

Juniper SoCO provides comprehensive healing resources to survivors of sexual assault / intimate partner violence, equipping the community to prevent future sexual violence, & fostering an organizational culture that prioritizes wellness…

Health
11
Advocates for Recovery Colorado

Recovery from addiction is a process of gaining sobriety and contributing to one's family and community as a healthy productive person. AFRC provides peer coach mentoring to individuals in recovery from substance use disorders.

Human Services
12
Summitstone Health Partners

SummitStone provides comprehensive behavioral health services across all care levels: 24/7 crisis services, inpatient and outpatient treatment, housing, residential care, and peer support. We partner with law enforcement, schools, and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Energy Resource Center; the most unlike its peers is Ballet Folklorico De Barajas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

135 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 135 of the 149 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
49
Early backer (in before they grew)
129/135
Grantees still filing
95/135
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Rocky Mountain Field Institute Inc: $399,133 · OtherRocky Mountain Field Institute IncNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS - COLORADO SPRINGS: $235,600 · OtherNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS - COLORADO …WESTSIDE CARES INC: $208,833 · OtherWESTSIDE CARES INCMANITOU ART CENTER: $165,760 · OtherINSIDE OUT YOUTH SERVICES: $176,695 · OtherENERGY RESOURCE CENTER: $124,317 · OtherFRIENDS OF MONUMENT VALLEY PARK INC: $127,331 · Other+73 more: $2,106,701 · Other+73 moreONE NATION WALKING TOGETHER: $215,654 · Human ServicesONE NATION WALKING …TESSA: $207,400 · Human ServicesTESSASAFE PLACE INC: $136,018 · Human ServicesSAFE PLACE INCThe Place: $135,448 · Human ServicesThe PlaceFOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $111,793 · Human ServicesFOSTERING HOPE FOUN…TRI-LAKES CARES: $107,831 · Human ServicesTRI-LAKES CARESCourt Care for the Pikes Peak Region Inc: $106,579 · Human ServicesCourt Care for the …The Catamount Institute: $106,037 · Human ServicesThe Catamount Insti…THE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $77,438 · Human ServicesTeller Senior Coalition Inc: $62,716 · Human Services+15 more: $210,427 · Human Services+15 moreHAPPY CATS HAVEN INC: $345,171 · AnimalsHAPPY CATS HAVEN…COLORADO SPRINGS ALL BREED RESCUE: $249,762 · AnimalsCOLORADO SPRINGS…HARLEYS HOPE FOUNDATION: $174,884 · AnimalsHARLEYS HOPE FOU…FELINE RESCUE NETWORK: $132,296 · AnimalsFELINE RESCUE NE…Paws N Hooves: $126,474 · AnimalsPaws N HoovesMustang Ambassador Program: $80,392 · AnimalsMustang Ambassad…Wild Blue Cats: $63,453 · Animals+4 more: $82,111 · Animals+4 moreFRIENDS OF THE NEW HORIZONS BAND OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $203,244 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF …MANITOU ART THEATRE: $134,205 · Arts & CultureMANITOU ART…SPRINGS ENSEMBLE THEATRE: $114,703 · Arts & CultureSPRINGS ENS…COLORADO SPRINGS CHILDREN'S CHORALE: $91,192 · Arts & CultureCOLORADO SP…Rocky Mountain Womens Film Institute: $84,359 · Arts & CultureRocky Mount…ORMAO DANCE COMPANY INC: $83,539 · Arts & CultureORMAO DANCE…Colorado Springs Community Ventures Inc: $54,720 · Arts & CultureColorado Sp…COLORADO SPRINGS PIONEERS MUSEUM: $30,628 · Arts & Culture+7 more: $99,247 · Arts & Culture+7 moreSUICIDE PREVENTION PARTNERSHIP-PIKES PEA: $106,994 · HealthPROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC: $69,678 · HealthCommunity Coalition for Families and Children: $69,288 · HealthCOLO SPGS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $66,081 · HealthSue DiNapoli Ovarian Cancer Society: $63,373 · HealthChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $48,928 · HealthCOLORADO HEALTH NETWORK INC: $16,756 · Health+5 more: $33,725 · HealthTrails and Open Space Coalition: $289,645 · Civil RightsCASA of the Pikes Peak Region: $139,553 · Civil RightsWILLIAM J PALMER PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $121,036 · Recreation & SportsBLACKPACKERS: $111,813 · Recreation & SportsMedicine Wheel Trail Advocates Inc: $100,675 · Recreation & SportsNational Mill Dog Rescue: $70,336 · Recreation & Sports
Other$3,544,370Human Services$1,477,341Animals$1,254,543Arts & Culture$895,837Health$474,823Civil Rights$429,198Recreation & Sports$403,860

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRocky Mountain Field Institute Inc: $399,133 over 8y, 5.7% of budgetHAPPY CATS HAVEN INC: $345,171 over 8y, 14% of budgetTrails and Open Space Coalition: $289,645 over 8y, 21% of budgetCOLORADO SPRINGS ALL BREED RESCUE: $249,762 over 8y, 9.6% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS - COLORADO SPRINGS: $235,600 over 8y, 12% of budgetONE NATION WALKING TOGETHER: $215,654 over 4y, 36% of budgetWESTSIDE CARES INC: $208,833 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetTESSA: $207,400 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE NEW HORIZONS BAND OF COLORADO SPRINGS: $203,244 over 8y, 42% of budgetINSIDE OUT YOUTH SERVICES: $176,695 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetHARLEYS HOPE FOUNDATION: $174,884 over 8y, 18% of budgetMANITOU ART CENTER: $165,760 over 8y, 10% of budgetCASA of the Pikes Peak Region: $139,553 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetSAFE PLACE INC: $136,018 over 8y, 25% of budgetThe Place: $135,448 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetMANITOU ART THEATRE: $134,205 over 8y, 6.6% of budgetFELINE RESCUE NETWORK: $132,296 over 8y, 24% of budgetFRIENDS OF MONUMENT VALLEY PARK INC: $127,331 over 8y, 56% of budgetPaws N Hooves: $126,474 over 8y, 15% of budgetENERGY RESOURCE CENTER: $124,317 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetWILLIAM J PALMER PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $121,036 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetSPRINGS ENSEMBLE THEATRE: $114,703 over 8y, 41% of budgetPeak Education: $113,111 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetCHRISTIAN HEALING NETWORK dba Mission Medical Center: $111,869 over 7y, 11% of budgetBLACKPACKERS: $111,813 over 5y, 15% of budgetFOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION: $111,793 over 5y, 7.2% of budgetFOOD TO POWER (FKA COLORADO SPRINGS FOOD RESCUE): $110,148 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetTRI-LAKES CARES: $107,831 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetTHE ARC PIKES PEAK REGION: $107,317 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetSUICIDE PREVENTION PARTNERSHIP-PIKES PEA: $106,994 over 8y, 8.2% of budgetCourt Care for the Pikes Peak Region Inc: $106,579 over 8y, 6.6% of budgetThe Catamount Institute: $106,037 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetMedicine Wheel Trail Advocates Inc: $100,675 over 6y, 33% of budgetCOLORADO SPRINGS CHILDREN'S CHORALE: $91,192 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetRocky Mountain Womens Film Institute: $84,359 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetORMAO DANCE COMPANY INC: $83,539 over 8y, 7.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $83,111 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMustang Ambassador Program: $80,392 over 5y, 18% of budgetTHE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $77,438 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNational Mill Dog Rescue: $70,336 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetPROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC: $69,678 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCommunity Coalition for Families and Children: $69,288 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetKIDS ON BIKES INC: $68,235 over 2y, 23% of budgetCOLO SPGS THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $66,081 over 8y, 4.5% of budgetPIKES PEAK LIBRARY DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC: $64,694 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetWild Blue Cats: $63,453 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetSue DiNapoli Ovarian Cancer Society: $63,373 over 4y, 12% of budgetTeller Senior Coalition Inc: $62,716 over 8y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Rocky Mountain Field Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds HAPPY CATS HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Trails and Open Space Coalition ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO SPRINGS ALL BREED RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS - COLORADO SPRINGS ↗
  • Who funds ONE NATION WALKING TOGETHER ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds TESSA ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE NEW HORIZONS BAND OF COLORADO SPRINGS ↗
  • Who funds INSIDE OUT YOUTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds HARLEYS HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MANITOU ART CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CASA of the Pikes Peak Region ↗
  • Who funds SAFE PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Place ↗
  • Who funds MANITOU ART THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds FELINE RESCUE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MONUMENT VALLEY PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds Paws N Hooves ↗
  • Who funds ENERGY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM J PALMER PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGS ENSEMBLE THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds Peak Education ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN HEALING NETWORK dba Mission Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds BLACKPACKERS ↗
  • Who funds FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOOD TO POWER (FKA COLORADO SPRINGS FOOD RESCUE) ↗
  • Who funds TRI-LAKES CARES ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC PIKES PEAK REGION ↗
  • Who funds SUICIDE PREVENTION PARTNERSHIP-PIKES PEA ↗
  • Who funds Court Care for the Pikes Peak Region Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Catamount Institute ↗
  • Who funds Medicine Wheel Trail Advocates Inc ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO SPRINGS CHILDREN'S CHORALE ↗
  • Who funds Colorado Springs Youth Symphony Association ↗
  • Who funds Rocky Mountain Womens Film Institute ↗
  • Who funds ORMAO DANCE COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mustang Ambassador Program ↗
  • Who funds THE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pikes Peak Community FoundationCO129.1× affinity65 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pikes Peak Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Colorado Springs Health Foundation · The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · The Myron Stratton Home · Pikes Peak United Way · The Hester E & Edwin W Giddings Foundation · Bee Vradenburg Foundation · Colorado Springs Osteopathic Foundation · Luther T McCauley Charitable Trust Xxxxx3001 · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Marson Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 46%
  • Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc: 46% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
46report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak?

Find your warmest path to INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 149 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak’s filings →

More from the funding graph