Skip to content

Indiana · Public charity

Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc

We protect nature and inspire people to care for our world. We believe in a world where nature and people thrive. We are one team. We care. We welcome everyone. We have integrity. We strive for excellence.

$562k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
5
Itemized grants FY2024
11
Organizations funded FY2023
64%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$153k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$23,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$80,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 11
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
5
Total assets, FY2024
$245M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 64% of the organizations Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 44% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $132k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
AnimalsEnvironmentPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving5$153k80%
FY202311$300k64%
FY20229$223k33%
FY20219$270k22%
FY20204$121k0%
FY20195$134k20%
FY20188$171k38%
FY201710$198kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$1.3MEnvironment$236kEducation$23kYouth Development$10k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
MT
MN
IL
NY
IA
IN
CA
CO
VA
MD
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
GA
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 29 grantees
All grantees of Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Lincoln Park Zoological Society$420,00080%
Wildlife Conservation Society$280,00060%
Rewild$140,00050%
World Parrot Trust USA Inc$124,45553%
International Elephant Foundation$64,89553%
Cheetah Conservation Fund$53,05041%
Mara Elephant Project USA Inc$51,99140%
American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums Inc$50,00010%
WIDECAST Wider Caribbean Sea Turtle Conservation Network Inc$50,00013%
Indiana National Resources$33,9452n/a
Conservation International Foundation$25,00010%
Regents of the University of Colorado$25,0001n/a
International Association of Crocodile Specialists USA Inc$24,903143%
Sycamore Land Trust Incorporated$23,00011%
North American Sturgeon & Paddlefish Society$20,0001n/a
Chicago Horticultural Society$20,00010%
The Turtle Survival Alliance Foundation$18,00011%
Stony Brook Foundation Inc$15,00010%
The University of North Carolina at Greensboro$15,0001n/a
Oklahoma Zoological Society$15,00010%
Southern Conservation Partners Inc$12,50012%
Iowa Bird Rehabilitation$12,500112%
Reserva the Youth Lad Trust Inc$10,0001n/a
Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc$10,0001n/a
National Tropical Botanical Garden$10,00010%
Snow Leopard Conservancy$10,00012%
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc$10,00010%
University of Minnesota$7,8001n/a
Seward Association for the Advancement of Marine Science$5,12710%

Plus 1 recipient with no EIN on record ($12k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 22 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLincoln Park Zoological Society: $420,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $280,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRewild: $140,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWorld Parrot Trust USA Inc: $124,455 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetInternational Elephant Foundation: $64,895 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetCheetah Conservation Fund: $53,050 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMara Elephant Project USA Inc: $51,991 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWIDECAST Wider Caribbean Sea Turtle Conservation Network Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetConservation International Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Association of Crocodile Specialists USA Inc: $24,903 over 1y, 43% of budgetSycamore Land Trust Incorporated: $23,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetChicago Horticultural Society: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Turtle Survival Alliance Foundation: $18,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetStony Brook Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOklahoma Zoological Society: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSouthern Conservation Partners Inc: $12,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetIowa Bird Rehabilitation: $12,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetNational Tropical Botanical Garden: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSnow Leopard Conservancy: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetWildlife Conservation Network Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeward Association for the Advancement of Marine Science: $5,127 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 22.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Zoological Society of CincinnatiOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Zoological Society of Cincinnati · Columbus Zoological Park Association · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc with peer funders

About Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc

How much does Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc give?
Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc reported 5 itemized grants totaling $153,000, out of $561,555 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 11 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Animals (83%), Environment (15%), Education (1%).
Who are Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Lincoln Park Zoological Society ($420k), Wildlife Conservation Society ($280k), Rewild ($140k).
Does Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 64% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Zoological Society of Cincinnati, Columbus Zoological Park Association, American Endowment Foundation.
Where is Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc based?
Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc is based in IN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Indianapolis Zoological Society’s filings →

More from the funding graph