Skip to content

Ohio · Public charity

Zoological Society of Cincinnati

Creating adventure, conveying knowledge, conserving nature, and serving the community. With the addition of our fourth pillar to our mission statement, serving community, we recognize the responsibility to partner with diverse and economically challenged communities in our daily work.

$952k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
14
Itemized grants FY2025
13
Organizations funded FY2024
8%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$388k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$20,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$106,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 13
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
9
Total assets, FY2025
$330M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 8% of the organizations Zoological Society of Cincinnati funded were first-time grantees, receiving 17% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving14$388k21%
FY202413$286k8%
FY202313$218k62%
FY20225$70k20%
FY20215$125k20%
FY20206$123k17%
FY20194$99k50%
FY20184$86k25%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$1.2MEducation$178kEnvironment$60k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MN
OR
CA
MO
NC
SC
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The International Rhino Foundation$230,54291%
Wild Entrust International$159,000812%
University of Washington$156,0002n/a
Washington University$155,54530%
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc$97,24430%
Global Conservation Network$92,16535%
Save the Manatee Club Inc$80,00050%
Wild Nature Institute$68,000312%
Sea to Shore Alliance$65,000512%
Houston Zoo Inc$58,55050%
Show all 21 grantees
All grantees of Zoological Society of Cincinnati by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The International Rhino Foundation$230,54291%
Wild Entrust International$159,000812%
University of Washington$156,0002n/a
Washington University$155,54530%
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc$97,24430%
Global Conservation Network$92,16535%
Save the Manatee Club Inc$80,00050%
Wild Nature Institute$68,000312%
Sea to Shore Alliance$65,000512%
Houston Zoo Inc$58,55050%
International Elephant Foundation$42,90041%
The Turtle Survival Alliance Foundation$32,10030%
Snow Leopard Conservancy$31,00013%
Friends of Bonobos$30,00031%
Red Panda Network$24,80031%
University of Minnesota Foundation$22,00010%
International Bird Rescue$13,50020%
World Parrot Trust USA Inc$12,58111%
Elakha Alliance$10,0001n/a
Global Conservation$8,50010%
Asian Elephant Support$5,55014%

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($60k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Zoological Society of Cincinnati supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe International Rhino Foundation: $230,542 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetWild Entrust International: $159,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetWashington University: $155,545 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Conservation Network Inc: $97,244 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGlobal Conservation Network: $92,165 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetSave the Manatee Club Inc: $80,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetWild Nature Institute: $68,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetSea to Shore Alliance: $65,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetHouston Zoo Inc: $58,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Elephant Foundation: $42,900 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetThe Turtle Survival Alliance Foundation: $32,100 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSnow Leopard Conservancy: $31,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetFriends of Bonobos: $30,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetRed Panda Network: $24,800 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetUniversity of Minnesota Foundation: $22,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Bird Rescue: $13,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWorld Parrot Trust USA Inc: $12,581 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGlobal Conservation: $8,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAsian Elephant Support: $5,550 over 1y, 3.6% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 19.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus Zoological Park AssociationOH20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Zoological Park Association · Zoological Society of San Diego · Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc · Sacramento Zoological Society · Dallas Zoo Management Inc · Houston Zoo Inc · Jacksonville Zoological Society Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Zoological Society of Cincinnati with peer funders

About Zoological Society of Cincinnati

How much does Zoological Society of Cincinnati give?
Zoological Society of Cincinnati reported 14 itemized grants totaling $387,825, out of $952,427 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 13 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Zoological Society of Cincinnati fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Animals (84%), Education (12%), Environment (4%).
Who are Zoological Society of Cincinnati's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: The International Rhino Foundation ($231k), Wild Entrust International ($159k), University of Washington ($156k).
Does Zoological Society of Cincinnati fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 8% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Zoological Society of Cincinnati?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Columbus Zoological Park Association, Zoological Society of San Diego, Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc.
Where is Zoological Society of Cincinnati based?
Zoological Society of Cincinnati is based in OH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Zoological Society of Cincinnati’s filings →

More from the funding graph