Skip to content
Indiana Hemophilia & Thrombosis Center Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Indiana Hemophilia & Thrombosis Center Inc

The indiana hemophilia and thrombosis center, inc.

$3.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$20MEducation$448kArts & Culture$40k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $417k
  • $250k+4 grants · $3.1M
$155,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$74M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC$1,501,367
HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN$693,392
HEMOPHILIA OF INDIANA$598,016
AMERICAN THROMBOSIS & HEMOSTASIS NETWORK$350,438
ACCESSIA HEALTH$155,000
WORLD FEDERATION OF HEMOPHILIA USA$100,000
INDIANA UNIVERSITY - DEPT 78867$86,606
NATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION$75,000
THE MARTIN CENTER$17,839
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF INDIANAPOLIS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 35% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WORLD FEDERATION OF HEMOPHILIA USA: $100k → 14%NATIONAL HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION: $150k → 17%REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $122k → 14%COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC: $4.1M → 8%THE MARTIN CENTER: $147k → 16%AMERICAN THROMBOSIS & HEMOSTASIS NETWORK: $1.8M → 8%ACCESSIA HEALTH: $155k → 7%LOUSIANA HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION: $30k → 19%WORLD FEDERATION OF HEMOPHILIA USA: $100k → 14%NATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION: $90k → 17%HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN: $1.2M → 14%COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC: $2.4M → 8%THE MARTIN CENTER: $143k → 16%AMERICAN THROMBOSIS & HEMOSTASIS NETWORK: $608k → 8%PATIENT SERVICES INC: $105k → 7%NATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION: $75k → 17%REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $106k → 14%COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC: $1.5M → 8%THE MARTIN CENTER: $113k → 16%AMERICAN THROMBOSIS & HEMOSTASIS NETWORK: $350k → 8%ACCESSIA HEALTH: $60k → 7%NATIONAL HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN: $693k → 14%COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC: $1.5M → 8%THE MARTIN CENTER: $110k → 16%PATIENT SERVICES INC: $55k → 7%NATIONAL HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION: $46k → 17%REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $106k → 14%COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC: $30k → 8%THE MARTIN CENTER: $76k → 16%PATIENT SERVICES INC: $50k → 7%HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN: $630k → 14%THE MARTIN CENTER: $18k → 16%PATIENT SERVICES INC: $20k → 7%REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $105k → 14%HEMOPHILIA OF INDIANA: $1.0M → 16%HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN: $97k → 14%HEMOPHILIA OF INDIANA: $598k → 16%HEMOPHILIA OF INDIANA: $511k → 16%HEMOPHILIA OF INDIANA: $164k → 16%HEMOPHILIA OF INDIANA: $74k → 16%CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF INDIANAPOLIS: $10k → 16%CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF INDIANAPOLIS: $10k → 16%CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF INDIANAPOLIS: $10k → 16%CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF INDIANAPOLIS: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20M · 12 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$20M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+30%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $9.5M · revenue +97%
  • AT
    AMERICAN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS NETWORK INC
    3× · 2019–2024 · $2.8M · revenue +32%
  • HF
    Hemophilia Foundation of Michigan
    4× · 2019–2024 · $2.7M · revenue +22% · 34% of their budget

Funded once

  • LH
    LOUISIANA HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana Hemophilia & Thrombosis Center Inc

The indiana hemophilia and thrombosis center, inc. is committed to providing the highest quality comprehensive services and holistic care to patients with bleeding, clotting and other hematologic disorders, and to their families.

Health
2
Hemophilia Center of Western Pa

To provide expert comprehensive multidisciplinary care to patients with hemophilia and other bleeding and clotting disorders.

Health
3
Hemophilia of Georgia Inc

Hemophilia of georgia exists so that people in georgia affected by bleeding disorders live as normally and productively as possible.

Health
4
Innovative Hematology Inc

Innovative hematology is committed to providing the highest quality comprehensive services and holistic care to patients with bleeding, clotting, and other hematologic disorders, and to their families.

Health
5
Bleeding Disorders Foundation of North Carolina

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of persons affected by bleeding disorders through advocacy, education, promotion of research and delivery of supportive programs and services.

Human Services
6
Bleeding Disorders Council of California formerly Hemophilia Council of Calif

The mission of hcc is to improve access to care and treatment options in order to advance the quality of life for people with bleeding disorders through advocacy, education, and outreach in the collaboration with its founding member…

Health
7
Hemophilia Foundation of Greater Florida Inc

Hemophilia foundation of greater florida is dedicated to improving the quality of life for people with related bleeding disorders and their families through education, information and referral services, advocacy and research.

Health
8
The Hemophilia Alliance Group Purchasing Organization

The hemophilia alliance provides member hemophilia treatment centers with resources and services to sustain the comprehensive care model for individuals with bleeding and clotting disorders.

Health
9
Hemophilia Foundation of Southern California

HFSCs mission is to improve the quality of life and build community for families and individuals living with hemophilia or other bleeding disorders, by offering a variety of programs and services that educate, advocate and support the…

—
10
The Hemophilia Assoc of San Diego County

The association was founded to provide programs for individuals with hemophilia.

—
11
Versiti Illinois Inc

Versiti illinois, inc. (versiti) is a blood health innovator which enhances lives through discovery, diagnosis and treatment. versiti expands the frontiers of patient health through the integration of science, medicine and service.

Health
12
Versiti Michigan Inc

Versiti michigan, inc. (versiti) is a blood health innovator which enhances lives through discovery, diagnosis and treatment. versiti expands the frontiers of patient health through the integration of science, medicine and service.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Bleeding Disorders Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Children's Museum of Indianapolis Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC: $9,475,160 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INCAMERICAN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS NETWORK INC: $2,756,558 · HealthAMERICAN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS NETWORK INCHemophilia Foundation of Michigan: $2,662,353 · HealthHemophilia Foundation of MichiganMARTIN CENTER INC MARTIN CTR SICKLE CELL INITIATIVE: $606,564 · Health+3 more: $836,753 · HealthHEMOPHILIA OF INDIANA INC: $2,384,781 · OtherHEMOPHILIA OF INDIAN…Indiana University School of Medicine: $447,912 · OtherIndiana University S…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $439,627 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVE…NATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION: $411,450 · OtherNATIONAL BLEEDING DI…+1 more: $30,000 · OtherThe Children's Museum of Indianapolis Inc: $40,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$16,337,388Other$3,713,770Arts & Culture$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC INC: $9,475,160 over 5y, 10% of budgetAMERICAN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS NETWORK INC: $2,756,558 over 3y, 15% of budgetHemophilia Foundation of Michigan: $2,662,353 over 4y, 34% of budgetHEMOPHILIA OF INDIANA INC: $2,384,781 over 5y, 95% of budgetMARTIN CENTER INC MARTIN CTR SICKLE CELL INITIATIVE: $606,564 over 6y, 17% of budgetAccessia Health: $445,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL BLEEDING DISORDERS FOUNDATION: $411,450 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetWORLD FEDERATION OF HEMOPHILIA USA: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVERSITI WISCONSIN INC: $191,753 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Children's Museum of Indianapolis Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOUISIANA HEMOPHILIA FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hemophilia Allian…The Hemophilia Allian…National Bleeding Dis…Hemophilia of Georgia…Colburn-Keenan Founda…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Hemophilia Alliance Group Purchasing OrganizationFL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hemophilia Alliance Group Purchasing Organization · The Hemophilia Alliance Foundation · National Bleeding Disorders Foundation · Hemophilia of Georgia Inc · Colburn-Keenan Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Indiana Hemophilia & Thrombosis Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Indiana Hemophilia & Thrombosis Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Indiana Hemophilia & Thrombosis Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home