· Public charity
Ibew Local #98 Labor Management Cooperative Committee Inc
The organization is organized as an area and industry-wide labor management cooperation committee as provided by 302(c)(9) of the taft-hartley act for the purposes set forth in 6(b) of the labor management cooperation act of 1978 , including the encouragement and support of establishment and area and industry-wide committee designed to…
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 22 grants below total $466,245 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $558,795 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $92,550 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $317k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PHILA FOUNDATION | $125,000 |
| COPWHEELS INC | $38,205 |
| EAGLES AUTISM CHALLENGE INC | $35,000 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $30,000 |
| THE SUPERHERO PROJECT INC | $26,000 |
| MARCH OF DIMES | $25,000 |
| POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE OF PHILADELPHIA | $25,000 |
| FAIRMONT PARK CONSERVANCY | $20,000 |
| SIXERS YOUTH FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| PHILLY RISE | $15,000 |
| VINCERA FOUNDATION | $12,550 |
| ALEX'S LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| PHILADELPHIA POLICE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| HERO THRILL SHOW INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
31 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $241k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AAAmerican Association for Cancer Research Inc2× · 2017–2018 · $110k · revenue +19%
- MAMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE6× · 2017–2022 · $80k · revenue +19%
- MRMAGEE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION2× · 2017–2018 · $75k · revenue +112%
Funded once
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +51%
- TBTHIRD BASE SPORTS AND TROPHIESone grant, 2022 · $49k
- NZNORRISTOWN ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETYgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +183%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…
The philadelphia convention & visitors bureau (phlcvb) is the official tourism promotion agency for the city of philadelphia globally, and the sales and marketing agency for the pennsylvania convention center (pcc). phlcvb markets…
Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.
As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…
The organization is an affiliate within thomas jefferson university/jefferson health; a comprehensive professional university and tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system ("system"), with a tripartite mission of education, research…
The mission of the philadelphia county medical society (pcms) is to aggressively advance and support the interests of physicians and their patients. pcms is pennsylvania's premier county medical organization.
Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Independence Blue Cross Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Association for Cancer Research Inc ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds MAGEE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COPWHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds FAIRMOUNT PARK CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Police Athletic League Of Philadelphia ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
- Who funds Simon Youth Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds VINCERA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE SUPERHERO PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds HEADSTRONG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Comcast Spectacor Charities Flyers Wives Fight For Lives ↗
- Who funds EAGLES AUTISM CHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds THE COOPER UNION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE & ART ↗
- Who funds MICHAEL'S WAY ↗
- Who funds NORRISTOWN ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds THE BARNES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Philly Rise Gbb ↗
- Who funds THE JERRY SEGAL CLASSIC ↗
- Who funds METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA CHINATOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PHILLY SEEDS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers #98 · The Snider Foundation · Comcast Spectacor Charities Flyers Wives Fight For Lives · The William Penn Foundation · The Gordon Charter Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Families Behind the Badge Children's Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · The Honickman Foundation · The Daniel B and Florence E Green Foundation · Phillies Charities Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ibew Local #98 Labor Management Cooperative Committee Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ibew Local #98 Labor Management Cooperative Committee Inc?
Find your warmest path to Ibew Local #98 Labor Management Cooperative Committee Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.