Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers #98

Labor union organization

$3.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$863k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 90% of INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS #98’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 23 grants below total $3,495,711 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,722,394 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $226,683 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $124k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $755k
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.6M
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$110M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MCGOLDRICK ELECTRIC INC$862,500
PHILLY ELECTRICAL SERVICES$770,000
LCN PARTNERS INC$381,561
MADDEN ELECTRIC ASSOCIATES INC$294,600
DOUGHERTY ELECTRIC INC$270,000
HOBBS & COMPANY INC$150,000
RUE ELECTRIC INC$150,000
LIBERTY INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS INC$102,800
ACME MARKETS (ALBERTSONS COMPANIES FOUNDATION)$101,872
ANMAR ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS$100,750
BUILD PHILLY NOW$100,000
BATTAGLIA ELECTRIC INC$50,000
BLACK BOX NETWORK SERVICES$40,000
AJM ELECTRIC$39,000
BELLES ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS LLC$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BACKPACK DRIVE (VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE): $5k → 11%PROJECT HOME: $10k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $10k → 22%THE JERRY SEGAL CLASSIC: $6k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.3M · 42 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

42 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
64

Total granted

$7.3M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+18%

Still filing today

55%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $812k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION
    3× · 2019–2021 · $145k · revenue +228%
  • MR
    MAGEE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2019 · $56k · revenue +112%
  • UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC
    3× · 2017–2021 · $56k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • SB
    SILAS BOLEF COMPANY
    one grant, 2019 · $215k
  • LC
    LYNDEE CORPORATION ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS
    one grant, 2023 · $200k
  • ME
    MJK ELECTRICAL CORPORATION
    one grant, 2019 · $164k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
2
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
3
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
4
Police Athletic League of Philadelphia
Youth Development
5
Pidc Development Management Corporation

Pidc dmc administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other not-for-profit entities.

Community Improvement
6
Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Corporation

Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.

Community Improvement
7
Pennsylvania Builders Association

Incorporated in 1945, the pennsylvania builders association is a nonprofit professional trade organization representing approximately 4,066 members from across the commonwealth. pba members include contractors, builders, and remodelers,…

8
Golf Association of Philadelphia Foundation
Recreation & Sports
9
Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry

The pennsylvania chamber of business and industry is the largest broad-based business association in pennsylvania. thousands of members throughout the commonwealth employ greater than 50 percent of pennsylvania's private workforce.…

10
Philadelphia Green Capital Corp

The philadelphia green capital corp. connects projects to capital (public, private and philanthropic) to drive a robust, equitable clean energy market in the greater philadelphia region, support the philadelphia energy authority, and…

Community Improvement
11
The Pennsylvania Horticultural Society

Founded in 1827, the pennsylvania horticultural society (phs) uses horticulture to advance the health and well-being of the greater philadelphia region. (continued in sch o)phs's work focuses on four impact priorities: creating healthy…

Environment
12
Philadelphia Hospitality Inc

Promote the greater philadelphia region as a premier destination for cultural & historical travel

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Philadelphia Delaware and Susquehanna Valley and the most unlike its peers is Independence Blue Cross Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr15%9%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr12%22%35–55yr14%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr17%42%20–35yr12%32%35–55yr14%14%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/103
the rest of the field
14%
2,929/21,115

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 120 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/66
Grantees still filing
49/66
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LCN PARTNERS INC — $1,205,016 · OtherLCN PARTNERS INCMCGOLDRICK ELECTRIC INC — $962,500 · OtherMCGOLDRICK ELECTRIC INCPHILLY ELECTRICAL SERVICES — $790,000 · OtherPHILLY ELECTRICAL SERVICESPHILLY ELECTRICAL SERVICES — $543,325 · OtherPHILLY ELECTRICAL SERVICESEMMS ELECTRIC INC — $450,000 · OtherDONALD A PUSEY INC — $347,500 · OtherRUE ELECTRIC INC — $322,000 · OtherMADDEN ELECTRIC ASSOCIATES INC — $319,600 · Other+78 more — $4,277,637 · Other+78 moreTHE ALBERTSONS COMPANIES FOUNDATION — $203,098 · PhilanthropyG FRED DIBONA JR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $31,500 · PhilanthropyPHILADELPHIA BUILDING TRADES CHARITY FUND — $26,750 · PhilanthropyIndependence Blue Cross Foundation — $15,000 · PhilanthropyACTBLUE CHARITIES INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyMAGEE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $56,000 · HealthTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS INC — $50,000 · HealthHEADSTRONG FOUNDATION — $40,000 · HealthLIVENGRIN FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $14,000 · HealthAUTISM REC — $12,680 · HealthMichael P Donatucci Foundation Inc — $10,000 · HealthVINCERA FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthTHE LEONARD & MADLYN ABRAMSON FAMILY CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $10,000 · Health+5 more — $33,878 · HealthPHILADELPHIA CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU FOUNDATION — $150,000 · Recreation & SportsJOE HAND BOXING GYM INC — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $55,500 · EducationTHE RONALD SMALLWOOD SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $19,300 · EducationHERO THRILL SHOW INC — $10,000 · EducationPHILADELPHIA ELECTRICAL & TECHNOLOGY CHA — $10,000 · EducationOFFICER DANIEL BOYLE SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $10,000 · EducationMATHEMATICS CIVIC & SCIENCES EDUCATION CENTER INC — $10,000 · EducationPEGGY BROWNING FUND — $10,000 · EducationPHILADELPHIA CITY FUND INC — $25,000 · Community ImprovementPHILADELPHIA CHINATOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $20,000 · Community ImprovementKING OF PRUSSIA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT INC — $11,000 · Community ImprovementVALLEY FORGE TOURISM AND CONVENTION BOARD — $10,000 · Community ImprovementRock Minstries of Philadelphia Inc — $40,000 · Crime & LegalPHILADELPHIA POLICE FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$9,217,578Philanthropy$286,348Health$256,558Recreation & Sports$170,000Education$124,800Community Improvement$66,000Crime & Legal$60,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE ALBERTSONS COMPANIES FOUNDATION — $203,098 over 3y, 0.1% of budget298 INC — $188,095 over 5y, 80% of budgetPHILADELPHIA CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION — $145,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBuild Philly Now — $100,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetMAGEE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $56,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $55,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAFL-CIO PHILADELPHIA COUNCIL — $50,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHEADSTRONG FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetRock Minstries of Philadelphia Inc — $40,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetKATIE KIRLIN CHARITABLE TRUST FOR PHYSICALLY DISABLED ATHLETES — $35,000 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetG FRED DIBONA JR MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $31,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetPHILADELPHIA BUILDING TRADES CHARITY FUND — $26,750 over 3y, 16% of budgetPhilabundance — $26,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA CITY FUND INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWHYY INC — $21,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOME — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPolice Athletic League Of Philadelphia — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPHILADELPHIA POLICE FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPHILLY SEEDS INC — $20,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetPHILADELPHIA CHINATOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetJOE HAND BOXING GYM INC — $20,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetLIVENGRIN FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RONALD SMALLWOOD SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $19,300 over 3y, 9.4% of budgetLegacy Youth Tennis And Education Inc — $17,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSTEAMFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO 420 — $16,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIndependence Blue Cross Foundation — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Association of Fire Fighters — $14,660 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM REC — $12,680 over 1y, 34% of budgetKING OF PRUSSIA BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT INC — $11,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetACTBLUE CHARITIES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHERO THRILL SHOW INC — $10,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetPHILADELPHIA ELECTRICAL & TECHNOLOGY CHA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOFFICER DANIEL BOYLE SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetVALLEY FORGE TOURISM AND CONVENTION BOARD — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMATHEMATICS CIVIC & SCIENCES EDUCATION CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN AFFAIRS COALITION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF RITTENHOUSE SQUARE — $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCOMMODORE JOHN BARRY ARTS & CULTURAL CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetVINCERA FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA 30 DAY FUND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNORRISTOWN ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAPTAIN ERICK FOSTER MEMORIAL RIDE — $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSOC OF FRIENDLY SONS OF ST PATRICK — $10,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ALBERTSONS COMPANIES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds 298 INC
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PASSAIC COUNTY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION
  • Who funds Build Philly Now
  • Who funds MAGEE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS INC
  • Who funds AFL-CIO PHILADELPHIA COUNCIL
  • Who funds ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ibew Local #98 Labor Management Cooperative Committee IncPA38.9× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ibew Local #98 Labor Management Cooperative Committee Inc · Sheet Metal Workers Local 19 Association Local 19 · Comcast Spectacor Charities Flyers Wives Fight For Lives · The Philadelphia Foundation · Connelly Foundation · The Honickman Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Neubauer Family Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Snider Foundation · The Cigna Group Foundation · International Union of Operating Engineers Local 542

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers #98 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 120 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph