· Public charity
Comcast Spectacor Charities Flyers Wives Fight For Lives
Comcast spectacor charities, which includes flyers charities and wings charities, cares about and invests in the health of our community by: honoring our legacy of supporting local families impacted by cancer; growing our game inclusive of new and diverse participants and audiences; supporting continuous improvements in sustainability…
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 31 grants below total $1,203,444 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,279,725 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $76,281 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $27k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $322k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $553k
- $250k+1 grant · $302k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Ed Snider Youth Hockey & Education | $301,660 |
| Ryan's Case for Smiles | $230,000 |
| Philadelphia Flyers Alumni Association Inc | $100,000 |
| Philadelphia Convention and Visitors Bureau Founda | $95,000 |
| Leveling the Playing Field Inc | $77,500 |
| Archbishop Damiano School | $50,000 |
| Mazzoni Center | $35,000 |
| Ed Snider Youth Hockey & Education | $30,000 |
| Ryan's Case for Smiles | $27,500 |
| University of Pennsylvania | $25,000 |
| Dear Jack Foundation | $20,000 |
| American Red Cross | $16,000 |
| Philadelphia Flyers Alumni Association Inc | $15,400 |
| Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of the Philadelphi | $15,000 |
| Chamber of Commerce Greater Philadelphia | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $380k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $164k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ESED SNIDER YOUTH HOCKEY & EDUCATION7× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +76%
- ESED SNIDER YOUTH HOCKEY SUPPORTING ORGANIZATION INC2× · 2022–2023 · $613k · revenue +41%
Philabundance7× · 2017–2025 · $321k · revenue +101%
Funded once
- CSComcast Spectacor LLC (Ridley rink)one grant, 2024 · $100k
- PEPLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZEDone grant, 2023 · $85k · revenue -10%
- MCMASTERY CHARTER SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue -40%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.
The national nurse-led care consortium (nncc) strives to advance nurse-led healthcare through policy, consultation, and programs to reduce health disparities and meet people's primary care and wellness needs.
Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.
The prostate cancer foundation (pcf) funds the world's most promising research on the biology and treatment of prostate cancer, accelerating those discoveries into therapies and strategies designed to improve the quality of life and…
Established exclusively for charitable purposes particularly raising contributions and payment of contributions to organizations described as exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code.
Greater philadelphia alliance for capital and technologies (pact)'s vision is to be a premier resource for emerging growth companies in the information technology, clean technology, and life sciences industries. pact connects emerging…
The mission of philadelphia youth sports collaborative (pysc) is to dramatically enhance the capacity of youth-serving organizations in philadelphia to provide high quality, sports-based youth development programs to children in every…
The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Philadelphia Delaware and Susquehanna Valley and the most unlike its peers is Hammerheads Sled Hockey Associationinc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
90 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 90 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ED SNIDER YOUTH HOCKEY & EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds ED SNIDER YOUTH HOCKEY SUPPORTING ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds Philabundance ↗
- Who funds RYAN'S CASE FOR SMILES ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA SOCCER 2026 ↗
- Who funds POTTSTOWN REGIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FKA POTTSTOWN AREA HEALTH AND WELLNESS ↗
- Who funds LEVELING THE PLAYING FIELD INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds Philadelphia Flyers Alumni Association ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MICHAEL'S WAY ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION ↗
- Who funds PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED ↗
- Who funds MASTERY CHARTER SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALL THINGS ARE POSSIBLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MAZZONI CENTER ↗
- Who funds SIMON'S FUND ↗
- Who funds BRINGING HOPE HOME ↗
- Who funds USO of Pennsylvania and Southern New Jersey Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds SARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds THE WISTAR INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY AND BIOLOGY ↗
- Who funds PITTSBURGH PENGUINS ELITE AMATEUR HOCKEY ↗
- Who funds MID ATLANTIC AMATEUR HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds YOU CAN PLAY ↗
- Who funds VINCERA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds USA Warriors Ice Hockey Program Inc USAWIHP ↗
- Who funds THE FUND FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds The Center for Autism ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
- Who funds USA HOCKEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENCE HISTORICAL TRUST ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The William Penn Foundation · Future Standard Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Wawa Foundation Inc · The Snider Foundation · The Neubauer Family Foundation · Phillies Charities Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Ibew Local #98 Labor Management Cooperative Committee Inc · International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers #98
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Comcast Spectacor Charities Flyers Wives Fight For Lives funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Usa Warriors Ice Hockey Program Inc Usawihp — 37% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.