Skip to content
I a O'Shaughnessy Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

I a O'Shaughnessy Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
110
Grants FY2024still arriving
21
States reached
$306k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$17MHuman Services$2.0MHealth$1.5MRecreation & Sports$1.4MArts & Culture$1.2MYouth Development$766kInternational$698kHousing & Shelter$605kOther$0
02FY2024 · 110 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k68 grants · $1.5M
  • $50k–250k32 grants · $2.8M
  • $250k+3 grants · $856k
$25,000
Median grant
21
States reached
$80M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOSTON COLLEGE - CITY CONNECTS$306,000
Individual grant recipient$300,000
BIG SHOULDERS FUND$250,000
READING PARTNERS TWIN CITIES$175,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS - CHICAGO$175,000
TNTP$175,000
READING PARTNERS$150,000
RESILIENT COMMUNITIES RESILITIENT FUTURE INC$150,000
BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE OF ILLINOIS INC$140,000
OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH$140,000
29 ACRES$96,970
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC$96,970
BABY'S SPACE$92,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC$91,970
FLORENCE CRITTENTON$85,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HARVEST HOME INC: $25k → 14%THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT: $40k → 8%THERE WITH CARE: $10k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DENVER: $55k → 12%MARILLAC ST VINCENT FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 14%HARVEST HOME INC: $25k → 14%GREEN CHAIR PROJECT: $30k → 8%FEJ-USA: $10k → 14%THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT: $19k → 8%FAMILIES RISING: $42k → 14%HARVEST HOME INC: $25k → 14%ORPHANED STARFISH FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 17%START AT ZERO: $25k → 15%START AT ZERO: $25k → 15%WAY TO GROW: $65k → 11%MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%BABY'S SPACE: $92k → 11%OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS: $20k → 11%CENTRO TYRON GUZMAN: $65k → 11%BABY'S SPACE: $25k → 11%BABY'S SPACE: $25k → 11%CENTRO TYRON GUZMAN: $25k → 11%CENTRO TYRON GUZMAN: $25k → 11%CENTRO TYRON GUZMAN: $20k → 11%CENTRO TYRON GUZMAN: $20k → 11%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $25k → 14%CENTRO TYRON GUZMAN: $20k → 11%CENTRO TYRON GUZMAN: $17k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DENVER: $158k → 12%FOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $55k → 12%FOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $52k → 12%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE GREATER ST PAUL AREA: $30k → 14%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $25k → 12%WAY TO GROW: $25k → 11%NEW MOMS INC: $60k → 14%CLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER: $20k → 12%FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO: $80k → 12%WAY TO GROW: $20k → 11%FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO: $25k → 12%FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO: $25k → 12%FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO: $20k → 12%FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO: $15k → 12%WARREN VILLAGE: $55k → 12%WINGS FOR WIDOWS: $111k → 11%ON YOUR FEET FOUNDATION: $39k → 14%THRIVING FAMILIES: $25k → 12%HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $40k → 14%HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
MD
NM
KS
AR
NC
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of I a O'Shaughnessy Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

I a O'Shaughnessy Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21M · 109 repeat orgs$4.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

109 repeat relationships: 53 still active in FY2024, 56 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

109
93

Total granted

$21M
$3.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+17%

Still filing today

78%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MONTESSORI TRAINING CENTER OF MINNESOTA INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +51%
  • PF
    PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $1.6M · revenue +141% · 33% of their budget
  • SP
    Strive Preparatory Schools
    4× · 2020–2023 · $958k · revenue +112%

Funded once

  • AC
    ASCENSION CATHOLIC ACADEMY
    one grant, 2020 · $158k
  • MC
    MORGRIDGE COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
    one grant, 2023 · $150k
  • SI
    SEARCH INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue -50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

—
2
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
5
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
6
Springboard Collaborative

Springboard collaborative combines targeted student instruction with parent training in an incentivized system that closes the literacy gap, by transferring the summer from a barrier into a springboard for financially disadvantaged…

Human Services
7
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
8
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
9
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
University Nursery Schools Inc

The mission of the university nursery school is to prepare the children in our community for a successful and fulfilling future throughout their education and beyond. we strive daily to provide loving care, as well as high quality and…

—
12
The Center for Early Education

The center for early education, a socio-economically and culturally diverse independent school for children, toddlers through grade six, strives to graduate students who are joyful, resilient, lifelong learners. the center embraces a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grantmakers for Education; the most unlike its peers is Timothy P O'shaughnessy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

182 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 182 of the 241 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
31
Early backer (in before they grew)
179/182
Grantees still filing
117/182
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MONTESSORI TRAINING CENTER OF MINNESOTA INC: $1,852,852 · EducationMONTESSORI TRAINING CENTER OF MINNESOTA INCPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $1,646,297 · EducationPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INCUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $1,211,181 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du LacStrive Preparatory Schools: $958,000 · EducationStrive Preparatory SchoolsBig Shoulders Fund: $900,000 · EducationBig Shoulders FundOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $393,395 · Education+37 more: $3,668,358 · Education+37 moreBOSTON COLLEGE - CITY CONNECTS: $1,943,107 · OtherBOSTON COLLEGE - CITY CONNECTSCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHICAGO: $800,000 · OtherCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHICAGOIndividual grant recipient: $713,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFLATHEAD VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $475,000 · Other+95 more: $7,073,392 · Other+95 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $213,000 · Human ServicesCENTRO TYRONE GUZMAN: $192,000 · Human ServicesFLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO: $175,000 · Human ServicesBABY'S SPACE A PLACE TO GROW: $142,000 · Human ServicesWINGS FOR WIDOWS: $116,131 · Human ServicesWAY TO GROW: $110,000 · Human ServicesFOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $107,000 · Human ServicesTHE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT: $98,625 · Human ServicesHarvest Home Inc: $75,000 · Human ServicesWARREN VILLAGE INC: $65,000 · Human Services+16 more: $527,682 · Human ServicesChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $834,755 · Health29 ACRES INC: $481,723 · HealthERASING THE DISTANCE: $103,109 · HealthPARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC: $65,000 · HealthTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $57,436 · Health+3 more: $103,832 · HealthWHITEFISH THEATRE COMPANY: $198,198 · Arts & CultureFILMNORTH: $93,500 · Arts & CultureCeltic Junction Arts Center Inc: $70,000 · Arts & CultureARTISTS SPACE INC: $65,000 · Arts & CultureBFFOUNDATION: $50,000 · Arts & CultureACCESS AFTERSCHOOL: $48,000 · Arts & CulturePORT TOWNSEND FILM INSTITUTE: $46,400 · Arts & CultureColorado Museum of Natural History: $25,000 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA LANDMARKS INC: $25,000 · Arts & CulturePARENTS TELEVISION COUNCIL INC: $25,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $84,520 · Arts & CulturePLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED: $250,000 · Youth DevelopmentFamily Engagement Lab: $225,000 · Youth DevelopmentSPY HOP PRODUCTIONS: $51,617 · Youth DevelopmentAndy Zanca Youth Empowerment Program: $20,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $218,000 · PhilanthropyJEFFERSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $162,178 · PhilanthropyGATHERINGPLACE: $61,950 · PhilanthropyGREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY: $50,000 · Philanthropy
Education$10,630,083Other$11,004,499Human Services$1,821,438Health$1,645,855Arts & Culture$730,618Youth Development$561,617Philanthropy$492,128

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMONTESSORI TRAINING CENTER OF MINNESOTA INC: $1,852,852 over 6y, 20% of budgetPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $1,646,297 over 5y, 33% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $1,211,181 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetStrive Preparatory Schools: $958,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBig Shoulders Fund: $900,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $834,755 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHICAGO: $800,000 over 4y, 8.6% of budget29 ACRES INC: $481,723 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetFLATHEAD VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $475,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $393,395 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTNTP INC: $350,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $325,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLAKE COUNTRY SCHOOL MONTESSORI LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS: $316,450 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetMINNESOTA COMEBACK: $300,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas: $274,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSEWALL CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $258,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetPLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED: $250,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetResilient Communities Resilient Futures Inc: $236,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetHOPE IGNITES CHICAGO: $228,348 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetJAWAAHIR DANCE COMPANY: $225,000 over 6y, 79% of budgetFamily Engagement Lab: $225,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $218,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER: $213,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWESTERN COLORADO UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWHITEFISH THEATRE COMPANY: $198,198 over 3y, 14% of budgetCENTRO TYRONE GUZMAN: $192,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetNORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE: $175,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO: $175,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetJEFFERSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $162,178 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetSEEDS OF HOPE OF NORTHERN COLORADO INC: $160,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEARCH INSTITUTE: $150,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR TEACHER RESIDENCIES: $150,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCRISTO REY NETWORK: $150,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND: $142,709 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBABY'S SPACE A PLACE TO GROW: $142,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetMarquette University: $130,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN PRAIRIE FOUNDATION: $130,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetAIM HIGHER FOUNDATION: $128,097 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetWINGS FOR WIDOWS: $116,131 over 2y, 38% of budgetKANSAS HISPANIC EDUCATION & DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $111,128 over 1y, 30% of budgetWAY TO GROW: $110,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetFOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $107,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $103,164 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetERASING THE DISTANCE: $103,109 over 5y, 25% of budgetTHE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT: $98,625 over 4y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives Founda…Temple Hoyne Buell Fo…The Denver FoundationAnschutz Family Found…Rose Community Founda…The Colorado Health F…Saint Paul & Minnesot…Mortenson Family Foun…The Minneapolis Found…The Anschutz Foundati…Jefferson Community F…The McKnight Foundati…
Colorado Gives FoundationCO32.4× affinity27 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Mortenson Family Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · The Anschutz Foundation · Jefferson Community Foundation · The McKnight Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization I a O'Shaughnessy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from I a O'Shaughnessy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
72report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to I a O'Shaughnessy Foundation?

Find your warmest path to I a O'Shaughnessy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 241 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on I a O'Shaughnessy’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home