Skip to content

Minnesota · Public charity

Food Group Minnesota Inc The

Fighting hunger. Nourishing our community.

$4.5M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
Read the full brief
Total assets, FY2025
$11M

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hunger Solutions MinnesotaMN88.7× affinity41 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hunger Solutions Minnesota · The Minneapolis Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Open Your Heart to the Hungry and Homeless · Otto Bremer Trust · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Pohlad Family Foundation · Russell T Lund Charitable Trust · Target Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Food Group Minnesota Inc The with peer funders

About Food Group Minnesota Inc The

How much does Food Group Minnesota Inc The give?
Food Group Minnesota Inc The reported $4,546,083 in grants in its FY2025 IRS filing. Individual grant detail isn't itemized in the e-filed return we have. It is referenced on an attached schedule, or the latest filing isn't in our corpus yet.
Which funders back the same organizations as Food Group Minnesota Inc The?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Hunger Solutions Minnesota, The Minneapolis Foundation, The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation.
Where is Food Group Minnesota Inc The based?
Food Group Minnesota Inc The is based in MN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph