Skip to content

· Private foundation

Hudiburg Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$44kAnimals$11kHealth$11kHousing & Shelter$6kCrime & Legal$5kArts & Culture$2kFood & Nutrition$2k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$229k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WINGS OF A BUTTERFLY$2,000
THE STEWPOT$2,000
STRENGTHENING FAMILIES INC$2,000
CHRIST'S HAVEN FOR CHILDREN$2,000
EQUINE SPIRIT SANCTUARY$2,000
A WISH WITH WINGS INC$2,000
THE ARCHWAY$2,000
ARLINGTON LIFE SHELTER$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%STRENGTHENING FAMILIES INC: $2k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $2k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $2k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $2k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $2k → 11%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $1k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $2k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $2k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $2k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $1k → 11%STRENGTHENING FAMILIES INC: $2k → 11%STRENGTHENING FAMILIES INC: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$77k · 9 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

$77k
$4k

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AW
    A WISH WITH WINGS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +161%
  • WO
    Wings of a Butterfly
    6× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +174%
  • ES
    EQUINE SPIRIT SANCTUARY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +167%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE STEWPOT
    one grant, 2025 · $2k
  • TA
    THE ARCHWAY
    one grant, 2025 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Angel Wings Out Reach Center Inc

To provide emergency shelter and services to victims of domestic violence.

Religion
2
Starr of Hope

The mission of STARR of Hope, in collaboration with the community resources, is to provide prevention, intervention, and advocacy for women and children who experience domestic abuse or violence in Starr, Zapata and Jim Hogg Counties.

Housing & Shelter
3
Casa of Williamson County Texas

CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.

Crime & Legal
4
Family Renewal Shelter

Family Renewal Shelter is a Christian humanitarian organization dedicated to bringing healing hope and a new life to victims of domestic violence.

Human Services
5
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
6
Womens Center of East Texas Inc

We are dedicated to providing safe haven, crisis intervention and comprehensive support services to victims of domestic and/or sexual violence in gregg, harrison, upshur, rusk, panola, and marion counties

Human Services
7
The Christian Home for Children Inc

Christian Home for Children, also known as Family Life Services, facilitates life transformation for single moms and their children through faith-based community. This is accomplished through a resident program and a community outreach…

—
8
Your Harvest House

Harvest House exists to restore hope and dignity by equipping families to overcome crisis and build long-term stability. We do this by pairing practical resources with relational support and spiritual encouragement, so help becomes lasting…

—
9
Soul Shelter Inc

Soul Shelter exists to purchase single-family homes to temporarily house primarily women with or without children in crisis situations (typically domestic abuse or human trafficking).

Human Services
10
Catholic Charities of Southeast Texas

People of faith responding to needs by serving, teaching, building community and preserving the dignity of individuals and families in Southeast Texas.

Human Services
11
Soaring Wings Ranch Inc

Soaring wings provides a christ-centered home for children while working with their families to overcome challenges they are facing for as long as needed.

Youth Development
12
Womens Crisis Services

Shelter for battered women

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christ's Haven for Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Equine Spirit Sanctuary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

A WISH WITH WINGS INC: $11,000 · OtherA WISH WITH WINGS INCWings of a Butterfly: $11,000 · OtherWings of a ButterflyChrist's Haven for Children Inc: $9,000 · OtherChrist's Haven for Children IncCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY STOREHOUSE INC: $7,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY STOREHOUSE INCTHE STEWPOT: $2,000 · OtherTHE ARCHWAY: $2,000 · OtherSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $9,000 · Human ServicesSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTYCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER IN…Strengthening Families Inc: $6,000 · Human ServicesStrengthening Families IncEQUINE SPIRIT SANCTUARY: $11,000 · AnimalsEQUINE SPIRIT S…ARLINGTON LIFE SHELTER: $6,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$42,000Human Services$22,000Animals$11,000Housing & Shelter$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetA WISH WITH WINGS INC: $11,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetWings of a Butterfly: $11,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetEQUINE SPIRIT SANCTUARY: $11,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChrist's Haven for Children Inc: $9,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY STOREHOUSE INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetARLINGTON LIFE SHELTER: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetStrengthening Families Inc: $6,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds A WISH WITH WINGS INC ↗
  • Who funds Wings of a Butterfly ↗
  • Who funds EQUINE SPIRIT SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Christ's Haven for Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY STOREHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARLINGTON LIFE SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds Strengthening Families Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Amon G Carter Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · America's Charities · Greater Keller Womens Club Foundation Inc · Norman M Kronick Fort Worth Foundation · Ken W Davis Foundation · Gil and Dody Weaver Foundation · United Way of Tarrant County · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Bnsf Railway Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Hudiburg Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Hudiburg Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Hudiburg Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Hudiburg Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hudiburg’s filings →

    More from the funding graph