· Private foundation
Hudiburg Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| STRENGTHENING FAMILIES INC | $2,000 |
| EQUINE SPIRIT SANCTUARY | $2,000 |
| CHRIST'S HAVEN FOR CHILDREN | $2,000 |
| ARLINGTON LIFE SHELTER | $2,000 |
| WINGS OF A BUTTERFLY | $2,000 |
| THE STEWPOT | $2,000 |
| THE ARCHWAY | $2,000 |
| A WISH WITH WINGS INC | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AWA WISH WITH WINGS INC6× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +120%
- WOWings of a Butterfly6× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +174%
- ESEQUINE SPIRIT SANCTUARY6× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +167%
Funded once
- TSTHE STEWPOTone grant, 2025 · $2k
- TATHE ARCHWAYone grant, 2025 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide emergency shelter and services to victims of domestic violence.
The mission of STARR of Hope, in collaboration with the community resources, is to provide prevention, intervention, and advocacy for women and children who experience domestic abuse or violence in Starr, Zapata and Jim Hogg Counties.
CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.
Family Renewal Shelter is a Christian humanitarian organization dedicated to bringing healing hope and a new life to victims of domestic violence.
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
We are dedicated to providing safe haven, crisis intervention and comprehensive support services to victims of domestic and/or sexual violence in gregg, harrison, upshur, rusk, panola, and marion counties
Christian Home for Children, also known as Family Life Services, facilitates life transformation for single moms and their children through faith-based community. This is accomplished through a resident program and a community outreach…
Harvest House exists to restore hope and dignity by equipping families to overcome crisis and build long-term stability. We do this by pairing practical resources with relational support and spiritual encouragement, so help becomes lasting…
Soul Shelter exists to purchase single-family homes to temporarily house primarily women with or without children in crisis situations (typically domestic abuse or human trafficking).
People of faith responding to needs by serving, teaching, building community and preserving the dignity of individuals and families in Southeast Texas.
Soaring wings provides a christ-centered home for children while working with their families to overcome challenges they are facing for as long as needed.
Shelter for battered women
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christ's Haven for Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Equine Spirit Sanctuary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds A WISH WITH WINGS INC ↗
- Who funds Wings of a Butterfly ↗
- Who funds EQUINE SPIRIT SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Christ's Haven for Children Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY STOREHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds ARLINGTON LIFE SHELTER ↗
- Who funds Strengthening Families Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Amon G Carter Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · America's Charities · Greater Keller Womens Club Foundation Inc · Norman M Kronick Fort Worth Foundation · Ken W Davis Foundation · Gil and Dody Weaver Foundation · United Way of Tarrant County · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Bnsf Railway Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hudiburg Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Hudiburg Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Hudiburg Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.